Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Parallelism isn't just a stylistic choice. It's a fundamental principle that exam graders look for when evaluating your writing clarity and sophistication. You're being tested on your ability to construct sentences where related ideas appear in matching grammatical forms, whether that means coordinating verbs, balancing phrases, or structuring lists consistently. Mastering parallelism directly impacts your scores on multiple-choice grammar questions and your essay responses.
The underlying principle is simple: parallel ideas deserve parallel structure. When you break this rule, readers stumble. When you follow it, your writing gains rhythm, clarity, and persuasive power. Don't just memorize what parallelism looks like. Understand why certain constructions demand it (conjunctions, comparisons, lists) and train yourself to spot faulty parallelism instantly.
Parallelism creates balance by matching grammatical structures. The brain processes symmetry more efficiently than asymmetry.
Parallelism means using identical grammatical forms for words, phrases, or clauses that serve the same function in a sentence. If two ideas are logically equal, their structure should be equal too.
Compare: Definition vs. Importance. The definition tells you what parallelism is (matching structures), while importance explains why it works (cognitive ease, emphasis, flow). FRQs often ask you to explain the effect of a technique, not just identify it.
When items belong to the same category logically, they should belong to the same category grammatically.
Every item in a list must share the same grammatical form: all nouns, all gerunds, all infinitives, or all clauses. This consistency lets readers focus on content rather than decoding shifting structures.
Bulleted lists follow the same rule, but the visual layout makes inconsistency even more obvious. Begin each item with the same part of speech, typically verbs in command form or nouns for formal documents.
Compare: Simple lists vs. Bulleted lists. Both require matching grammatical forms, but bulleted lists add a visual dimension that makes inconsistency stand out immediately. If a multiple-choice question shows a bulleted list, check the first word of each bullet right away.
Conjunctions are bridges. What appears on one side must match what appears on the other.
The coordinating conjunctions (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so) must connect grammatically equivalent elements: noun to noun, phrase to phrase, clause to clause. Balance on both sides is non-negotiable.
Correlative conjunctions come in pairs: either/or, neither/nor, not only/but also, both/and. Whatever grammatical structure follows the first word of the pair must follow the second. This is the most commonly tested parallelism rule.
The trick is to look at what comes immediately after each half of the pair:
Compare: Coordinating vs. Correlative conjunctions. Coordinating conjunctions connect two elements once, while correlative conjunctions create a two-part frame. Correlative constructions are trickier because you must track what comes immediately after each half of the pair. This distinction appears frequently in multiple-choice grammar questions.
When you compare or contrast, the grammatical playing field must be level.
Compared elements must share the same grammatical form: adjective to adjective, noun phrase to noun phrase, clause to clause. Faulty comparisons create logical confusion by suggesting you're comparing unlike things.
Verbs in a series should match in tense. Don't shift from past to present mid-list without a clear reason. Likewise, voice consistency (active or passive) prevents awkward, choppy sentences.
Compare: Comparisons vs. Tense consistency. Comparisons require parallel forms (adjective to adjective), while tense consistency requires parallel time frames (all past, all present). Both fall under parallelism, but they test different skills. Watch for answer choices that fix one issue while introducing the other.
Spotting faulty parallelism is a trainable skill. Look for the pattern, then find the break.
Here's a reliable process for catching errors:
A common error type is mixing gerunds with infinitives or nouns: "She likes reading, to swim, and bikes" contains three different forms.
Once you've found the break, choose one grammatical form and apply it consistently. Usually you should match to the first item or whichever option sounds most natural.
Reading your correction aloud helps. Parallel structures have a natural rhythm that your ear can detect, while faulty parallelism tends to sound choppy or awkward.
Compare: Identifying vs. Correcting. Identification asks what's wrong? while correction asks which fix maintains meaning and parallelism? Multiple-choice questions often include distractors that fix parallelism but change meaning, or vice versa. Always verify both.
Beyond correctness, parallelism is a tool for persuasion and memorability.
Repetition of structure amplifies key points. The pattern itself signals importance to readers. Consider why "government of the people, by the people, for the people" is so memorable. Without that structural repetition, the phrase loses its force entirely.
In your own essays, you can deploy parallelism strategically to strengthen thesis statements and concluding arguments. A parallel sentence in your conclusion can tie your ideas together with a sense of completeness.
Compare: Correctness vs. Rhetoric. Grammatical parallelism prevents errors, while rhetorical parallelism creates impact. On essays, you're graded on both: avoiding faulty parallelism and using intentional parallelism to strengthen your argument.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Lists and series | Gerund lists, noun lists, adjective series |
| Coordinating conjunctions | And, but, or connecting matched elements |
| Correlative conjunctions | Either/or, not only/but also, neither/nor |
| Comparisons | As...as, more...than with matched forms |
| Tense and voice consistency | Verb series maintaining same tense |
| Bulleted lists | Imperative verbs or consistent nouns |
| Rhetorical emphasis | Repetition for persuasive effect |
| Error correction | Matching all items to one grammatical form |
What do coordinating conjunctions and correlative conjunctions have in common regarding parallelism, and how do their structural demands differ?
If you encounter a sentence with a list containing "to analyze, evaluating, and the synthesis of data," which grammatical form would you choose to create parallelism, and why might that choice matter for clarity?
Compare and contrast parallelism in comparisons with parallelism in simple lists. What shared principle governs both, and what unique challenges does each present?
An FRQ asks you to revise a paragraph for clarity and coherence. You notice inconsistent verb tenses in a series and a correlative conjunction error. Which would you prioritize fixing first, and how would you explain your revision choices?
How does rhetorical parallelism (used for emphasis) differ from grammatical parallelism (used for correctness), and why do effective writers need both skills?