Key PR Models

Why This Matters

Public relations isn't just about writing press releases or managing social media—it's about understanding how and why communication works between organizations and their audiences. These models represent decades of research into what makes PR effective, and you're being tested on your ability to apply them strategically. Whether you're analyzing a campaign's approach, recommending a communication strategy, or explaining why certain tactics succeed while others fail, these frameworks give you the vocabulary and conceptual tools to think like a PR professional.

The models you'll encounter here fall into distinct categories: communication flow models that describe how messages move, strategic process models that guide campaign planning, media channel frameworks that organize tactical options, and audience segmentation theories that help you target the right people. Don't just memorize the acronyms—know what problem each model solves and when you'd reach for it in a real-world scenario. That's what separates surface-level recall from genuine understanding.

---

Communication Flow Models

These foundational models describe the direction and purpose of communication between organizations and their publics. Understanding whether communication is one-way or two-way—and who benefits—shapes every strategic decision in PR.

Press Agentry Model

• One-way persuasion is the defining characteristic—the organization pushes messages outward with no formal feedback mechanism
• Publicity-driven tactics like stunts, hype, and emotional appeals dominate; truth and accuracy are secondary to attention
• Historical roots in P.T. Barnum-era promotion make this the oldest PR model, still visible in entertainment and sports marketing

Public Information Model

• Factual dissemination distinguishes this from press agentry—accuracy matters, even though communication remains one-way
• Government and nonprofit sectors frequently use this approach for public announcements, health campaigns, and official communications
• Journalist-in-residence concept captures the practitioner's role: reporting truthful information about the organization to the public

Two-Way Asymmetrical Model

• Strategic feedback collection through research and surveys informs message development, but the goal remains organizational persuasion
• Scientific persuasion describes the approach—using audience insights to craft more effective influence campaigns
• Imbalanced benefit is the key critique; the organization uses what it learns to manipulate rather than genuinely respond

Two-Way Symmetrical Model

• Mutual understanding replaces persuasion as the primary goal—both organization and publics may change through dialogue
• Relationship-building orientation emphasizes long-term trust over short-term message wins
• Ethical gold standard in PR theory, though critics note it's rarely achieved in pure form in practice

---

Strategic Process Models

These step-by-step frameworks guide PR practitioners through campaign development. They share a common structure—research before action, evaluation after—but differ in emphasis and terminology.

RACE Model

• Research, Action, Communication, Evaluation provides a four-step linear process for campaign management
• Action phase focuses on strategic planning and decision-making before any communication occurs—a critical distinction
• Cyclical application means evaluation findings feed back into research for continuous improvement

RPIE Model

• Research, Planning, Implementation, Evaluation mirrors RACE but substitutes "Planning" and "Implementation" for "Action" and "Communication"
• APR exam standard makes this the preferred framework for accreditation testing and professional certification
• Practical emphasis on separating strategic planning from tactical execution helps prevent "ready, fire, aim" mistakes

---

Media Channel Frameworks

This model organizes the tactical landscape of modern PR by categorizing media types. It's essential for integrated campaign planning and resource allocation.

PESO Model

• Paid, Earned, Shared, Owned creates four distinct media categories that together form a complete communication ecosystem
• Convergence strategy is the real insight—effective campaigns integrate all four channels rather than relying on any single type
• Earned media credibility remains highest because third-party coverage implies endorsement, while owned media offers complete message control

---

Theoretical Foundations

These broader communication theories inform PR strategy by explaining how messages spread and who responds to them. They're less prescriptive than process models but equally important for strategic thinking.

Excellence Theory

• Organizational effectiveness links directly to PR quality—excellent PR contributes to excellent organizations, not just reputation management
• Empowered PR function requires practitioners to have access to senior management and participate in strategic decision-making
• Two-way symmetrical communication serves as the normative ideal within this framework, connecting it to Grunig's earlier work

Situational Theory of Publics

• Problem recognition, constraint recognition, and level of involvement determine how actively people seek and process information
• Four public types—non-publics, latent publics, aware publics, and active publics—require fundamentally different communication approaches
• Resource allocation insight helps practitioners prioritize: active publics deserve the most attention because they're already engaged and influential

Agenda-Setting Theory

• Media doesn't tell you what to think, but what to think about—this phrase captures the theory's core insight
• First-level effects determine which issues receive public attention; second-level effects shape how those issues are perceived
• PR practitioners as agenda influencers work to get their issues onto media agendas, thereby reaching public consciousness

Diffusion of Innovations Theory

• Five adopter categories—innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards—respond to new ideas at different rates
• Adoption stages (awareness, interest, evaluation, trial, adoption) map the psychological journey from first exposure to full acceptance
• Opinion leader targeting emerges as a key strategy: reach early adopters who influence the majority

---

Stakeholder Engagement

This framework shifts focus from message delivery to relationship management, emphasizing who organizations must communicate with and why.

Stakeholder Theory

• Beyond shareholders is the fundamental premise—employees, customers, communities, suppliers, and regulators all have legitimate interests in organizational decisions
• Relationship prioritization requires mapping stakeholders by power, legitimacy, and urgency to allocate communication resources effectively
• Long-term reputation building depends on consistent, ethical engagement with all stakeholder groups, not just financially powerful ones

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two models both use two-way communication but differ in whether the organization or mutual benefit is prioritized? Explain the practical implications of this difference.

2. A nonprofit launching a public health campaign wants to move people from unawareness to active engagement. Which theory would help them segment their audience, and what are the four categories they'd use?

3. Compare RACE and RPIE: What do the different terms emphasize, and why might a practitioner choose one framework over the other?

4. If you were advising a company launching an innovative new product, which theory would guide your communication timeline, and which adopter category would you target first?

5. Using the PESO model, design a brief integrated strategy for a crisis response. Which channel provides credibility? Which provides control? How would you sequence them?