Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're studying networked systems, understanding reliability metrics is fundamental to grasping how real-world networks succeed or fail. These metrics aren't just numbers—they represent the underlying principles of system availability, fault management, transmission quality, and architectural resilience that determine whether a network can actually serve its users. You'll be tested on how these metrics interact, why certain applications demand specific thresholds, and how engineers make trade-offs between competing priorities.
Don't just memorize definitions and formulas. For each metric, know what category it belongs to, what it actually measures about network behavior, and how it connects to user experience and system design. The strongest exam responses demonstrate that you understand why a metric matters, not just what it measures.
These metrics quantify how often a network is operational and how quickly it bounces back from failures. The core principle: reliability equals maximizing time in service while minimizing time spent broken.
Compare: MTBF vs. MTTR—both affect availability, but MTBF measures how often things break while MTTR measures how long they stay broken. If an FRQ asks about improving availability, discuss strategies targeting both: better components (MTBF) and faster response (MTTR).
These metrics capture what happens to data as it travels through the network. The core principle: successful transmission means data arrives completely, correctly, and on time.
Compare: Packet Loss vs. BER—both indicate transmission problems, but BER operates at the bit level (physical layer) while packet loss operates at the packet level (network layer). BER problems often cause packet loss when error correction fails.
These metrics measure when data arrives and how predictably it flows. The core principle: for many applications, consistent timing matters as much as raw speed.
Compare: Latency vs. Jitter—low latency with high jitter can be worse than moderate latency with low jitter for real-time applications. A video call with consistent 100ms delay feels smoother than one fluctuating between 20ms and 200ms.
These metrics assess how well a network handles adverse conditions. The core principle: reliable networks are designed to survive failures, not just avoid them.
Compare: Resilience vs. Fault Tolerance—fault tolerance focuses on surviving individual failures through redundancy, while resilience encompasses adapting to and recovering from broader disruptions. A fault-tolerant system has backup servers; a resilient system also has plans for cyberattacks, natural disasters, and demand spikes.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Uptime measurement | Availability, MTBF |
| Recovery speed | MTTR |
| Data integrity | Packet Loss Rate, BER |
| Timing performance | Latency, Jitter |
| Capacity measurement | Throughput |
| Failure survival | Fault Tolerance, Network Resilience |
| Real-time app critical | Latency, Jitter, Packet Loss |
| Physical layer quality | BER |
Which two metrics combine mathematically to determine availability, and how would you express their relationship as a formula?
A video conferencing application is experiencing choppy audio but the average latency is acceptable. Which metric is most likely the problem, and why does it affect real-time applications differently than file downloads?
Compare and contrast packet loss rate and bit error rate: at which network layers do they operate, and how might one cause the other?
If you needed to improve a network's availability from 99.9% to 99.99%, would you focus on MTBF or MTTR improvements first? What factors would influence your decision?
An FRQ asks you to design a network architecture for a hospital's critical systems. Which metrics would you prioritize, and what specific design choices (redundancy, monitoring, etc.) would address each one?