Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Spectroscopy is the backbone of molecular physics—it's how we "see" molecules without actually seeing them. Every technique on this list exploits a different physical interaction between electromagnetic radiation and matter, whether that's vibrational excitation, electronic transitions, nuclear spin flips, or rotational motion. When you're tested on these techniques, you're really being tested on your understanding of energy quantization, selection rules, and how molecular structure determines which wavelengths get absorbed, scattered, or emitted.
The key to mastering this material isn't memorizing wavelength ranges—it's understanding why each technique works and what molecular property it reveals. An IR spectrum tells you about bond vibrations because infrared photons have just the right energy to excite vibrational modes. NMR works because nuclei with spin behave like tiny magnets in a magnetic field. Don't just memorize facts—know what physical principle each technique illustrates and when you'd choose one over another.
These methods probe the quantized vibrational energy levels of molecules. When a molecule absorbs a photon matching the energy gap between vibrational states, we detect that absorption and learn about bond strengths, molecular geometry, and functional groups.
Compare: IR Spectroscopy vs. Raman Spectroscopy—both probe vibrational modes, but IR requires dipole moment change while Raman requires polarizability change. For a molecule with a center of symmetry, vibrations are either IR-active OR Raman-active, never both (mutual exclusion rule). If asked to analyze a symmetric molecule, Raman is your go-to technique.
These techniques involve transitions between electronic energy levels, requiring higher-energy photons. Electronic spectroscopy reveals information about molecular orbital structure, conjugation, and chromophores.
Compare: UV-Vis vs. Fluorescence Spectroscopy—both involve electronic transitions, but UV-Vis measures absorption while fluorescence measures emission. Fluorescence offers far greater sensitivity (detecting single molecules) but requires fluorescent samples. For quantitative concentration work, UV-Vis with Beer-Lambert is standard.
These methods exploit the magnetic properties of atomic nuclei or unpaired electrons. Energy splittings in magnetic fields are tiny, requiring radio-frequency or microwave radiation.
Compare: NMR vs. ESR—both use magnetic resonance principles, but NMR probes nuclear spins (all molecules) while ESR probes electron spins (only paramagnetic species). ESR operates at microwave frequencies and is ~1000× more sensitive per spin, but limited to samples with unpaired electrons.
These methods determine precise molecular geometry through rotational spectroscopy or diffraction patterns.
Compare: Microwave Spectroscopy vs. XRD—both determine molecular structure, but microwave works on gas-phase molecules (giving bond lengths from rotational constants) while XRD requires crystals (giving atomic positions from diffraction). For small gas-phase molecules, microwave gives the most precise bond lengths; for large biomolecules, XRD is essential.
These specialized methods provide information about molecular mass, composition, or nuclear environment through non-optical interactions.
Compare: Mass Spectrometry vs. Mössbauer—completely different physical principles (ion acceleration vs. nuclear gamma resonance), but both provide composition information. Mass spec works on any ionizable molecule and gives molecular weight; Mössbauer is limited to specific nuclei but reveals oxidation state and local electronic structure.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Vibrational transitions | IR Spectroscopy, Raman Spectroscopy |
| Electronic transitions | UV-Visible, Fluorescence |
| Magnetic resonance | NMR, ESR |
| Rotational transitions | Microwave Spectroscopy |
| Structural determination | XRD, Microwave, NMR |
| Requires dipole moment | IR, Microwave |
| Requires polarizability change | Raman |
| Paramagnetic samples only | ESR |
| Crystalline samples only | XRD |
| Nuclear-specific | Mössbauer, NMR |
Which two techniques both probe vibrational modes but have complementary selection rules? What molecular property determines activity in each?
A molecule has a center of symmetry. If a particular vibration is IR-active, what can you conclude about its Raman activity, and why?
Compare NMR and ESR spectroscopy: what type of magnetic moment does each detect, and what limits ESR to certain samples?
You need to determine the precise bond length in a gas-phase diatomic molecule. Which technique would give the most accurate result, and what physical quantity would you measure?
An FRQ asks you to identify which spectroscopic technique would best distinguish between and in a solid sample. Which technique would you choose and what spectral feature would differ?