Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Minimalism represents one of the most radical breaks in art history—a deliberate rejection of Abstract Expressionism's emotional intensity in favor of industrial materials, geometric forms, and viewer-centered experience. When you encounter these sculptures on the exam, you're being tested on your understanding of how artists stripped away narrative, symbolism, and the artist's "hand" to focus on objecthood, phenomenology (how we perceive objects in space), and the literal properties of materials. These works don't represent anything—they simply are.
The key concepts you need to master include seriality and repetition, the relationship between object and environment, industrial versus organic materials, and the viewer's bodily experience of scale and space. Don't just memorize which artist made which geometric shape—know what principle each sculpture demonstrates. If an FRQ asks about Minimalism's challenge to traditional sculpture, you need to explain why a stack of bricks or a fluorescent tube counts as art.
These works emphasize modular units arranged according to predetermined systems, removing the artist's subjective decision-making from composition. The concept or system generates the form, not intuition or emotion.
Compare: Judd's "Stack" vs. LeWitt's "Serial Project"—both use repetition of geometric units, but Judd emphasizes physical presence and specific materials while LeWitt prioritizes conceptual systems over materiality. If asked about Minimalism's relationship to Conceptual Art, LeWitt bridges both movements.
These sculptors embraced factory-made materials—steel, bricks, fluorescent lights—to eliminate the "artist's touch" and emphasize the literal, physical properties of objects rather than metaphor or illusion.
Compare: Andre's "Equivalent VIII" vs. Flavin's "Diagonal"—both use industrial materials literally (bricks remain bricks, lights remain lights), but Andre emphasizes mass and horizontal extension while Flavin dematerializes space through light and color. This contrast illustrates Minimalism's range from heavy physicality to ethereal presence.
These works engage the viewer's bodily awareness—you don't just look at them, you experience your own physical relationship to their mass, height, and spatial presence. Phenomenology (the study of direct experience) is key here.
Compare: Smith's "Die" vs. Morris's "L-Beams"—both address human-scale perception, but "Die" presents a single, unchanging form while Morris's three identical beams prove that context and position alter how we perceive identical objects. This is a crucial point for FRQs about phenomenology in Minimalism.
These works blur the line between sculpture and painting, using color and reflective surfaces as primary elements rather than secondary decoration.
Compare: Truitt's "First" vs. McCracken's "Plank"—both prioritize color and surface, but Truitt's matte, hand-painted surfaces suggest interiority and emotion while McCracken's glossy industrial finish emphasizes exteriority and reflection. Both challenge the assumption that Minimalism was purely about neutral, colorless forms.
These artists pushed beyond strict Minimalism's geometric rigidity, introducing organic materials, chance, and bodily vulnerability while retaining interest in seriality and materiality.
Compare: Judd's "Stack" vs. Hesse's "Repetition Nineteen III"—both use serial repetition, but Judd's industrial fabrication produces identical units while Hesse's handmade process ensures each form is unique despite the system. This comparison perfectly illustrates the shift from Minimalism to Post-Minimalism.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Serial/Systematic Repetition | Judd's "Stack," LeWitt's "Serial Project," Hesse's "Repetition Nineteen III" |
| Industrial Materials (Literal Use) | Andre's "Equivalent VIII," Flavin's "Diagonal," Serra's "One Ton Prop" |
| Phenomenology/Body-Scale | Smith's "Die," Morris's "L-Beams" |
| Color and Surface | Truitt's "First," McCracken's "Black Plank" |
| Light and Dematerialization | Flavin's "Diagonal" |
| Weight and Gravity | Serra's "One Ton Prop," Andre's "Equivalent VIII" |
| Post-Minimalist Organic Forms | Hesse's "Repetition Nineteen III" |
| Conceptual Systems | LeWitt's "Serial Project" |
Which two sculptures best demonstrate the contrast between industrial fabrication and handmade process within serial formats? What does this difference reveal about each artist's priorities?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how Minimalist sculpture redefined the viewer's role, which three works would you choose and why?
Compare Andre's "Equivalent VIII" and Flavin's "Diagonal of May 25, 1963"—how do both use industrial materials literally, yet create opposite effects regarding mass and space?
How does Eva Hesse's "Repetition Nineteen III" both embrace and critique Minimalist principles? What makes it "Post-Minimalist"?
Why might an art historian argue that Anne Truitt and John McCracken challenge the standard narrative of Minimalism as purely geometric and colorless? Use specific details from their works.