Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Minimalism wasn't just an aesthetic choice—it was a radical philosophical break from everything art had been doing. When you study these artists, you're being tested on your understanding of how art shifted from representation to presence, from illusion to literal object, from artist's expression to viewer's experience. The AP exam loves to probe whether you grasp the underlying logic: why did these artists strip away narrative? What happens when a sculpture sits on the floor instead of a pedestal? How does industrial material challenge the hierarchy between "fine art" and everyday objects?
These ten artists represent distinct approaches to the same core questions about materiality, space, perception, and the role of the viewer. Don't just memorize who made what—know what concept each artist best exemplifies. If an FRQ asks about the relationship between artwork and architectural space, you need to immediately think of Flavin or Serra. If it's about the dematerialization of the art object, LeWitt is your answer. Master the connections, and you'll handle any prompt they throw at you.
These artists rejected traditional art materials in favor of factory-produced, industrial components. The goal was to eliminate the artist's hand and emotional expression, letting the object exist on its own terms.
Compare: Judd vs. Serra—both used industrial metals, but Judd's pristine boxes emphasize geometric clarity while Serra's weathered steel emphasizes mass, gravity, and bodily threat. If an FRQ asks about viewer experience, Serra's immersive walkways offer richer material than Judd's contemplative distance.
These artists pushed Minimalism toward dematerialization, using light itself as medium. They challenged sculpture's traditional reliance on solid form and mass.
Compare: Flavin vs. LeWitt—Flavin's light creates immediate sensory experience, while LeWitt's instructions prioritize the concept over perception. Both dematerialize the art object, but through opposite strategies: phenomenological presence vs. linguistic abstraction.
These artists rejected the pedestal, placing work directly on floors to merge art with everyday space. This horizontal orientation democratized the viewing experience and emphasized physical engagement.
Compare: Andre vs. Smith—Andre's flat floor pieces spread horizontally and invite physical contact, while Smith's volumetric cubes rise vertically and maintain sculptural autonomy. Both eliminate the pedestal, but Andre merges art with ground while Smith occupies space as a distinct presence.
These artists emphasized how materials behave—gravity, weight, flexibility—over predetermined geometric form. The artwork becomes a record of physical forces acting on matter.
Compare: Morris vs. Truitt—Morris embraced industrial materials and anti-form chaos, while Truitt maintained geometric clarity with handcrafted surfaces. Both explored physicality, but Morris emphasized process while Truitt emphasized contemplation.
These artists pushed painting toward objecthood, eliminating illusionistic depth to emphasize the canvas as a literal thing. They asked: what happens when a painting refuses to be a window?
Compare: Stella vs. Martin—Stella's hard-edge geometry and bold color assert painting as object, while Martin's trembling grids and pale washes evoke transcendence. Both rejected illusionism, but Stella emphasized material presence while Martin pursued spiritual absence.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Industrial materials / fabrication | Judd, Serra, Flavin |
| Site-specificity | Flavin, Serra, Andre |
| Conceptual art / idea over object | LeWitt, Morris |
| Viewer physical engagement | Andre, Serra, Smith |
| Dematerialization / light | Flavin, LeWitt |
| Anti-form / process | Morris |
| Painting as object | Stella, Martin |
| Emotional / spiritual content | Martin, Truitt |
Which two artists most directly challenged the boundary between sculpture and architecture through site-specific installations, and how do their approaches differ?
If an FRQ asks you to discuss how Minimalist artists eliminated the "artist's hand," which three artists provide the strongest examples, and what strategies did each use?
Compare and contrast Andre's floor sculptures with Smith's volumetric forms—what do they share philosophically, and where do they diverge in terms of viewer experience?
Which artist bridges Minimalism and Conceptual Art most explicitly, and why might an exam question pair this artist with Judd as representing two poles of the movement?
Martin and Truitt are often grouped together as Minimalists who retained emotional or spiritual content. What formal strategies distinguish their work from the industrial coldness of Judd or Andre?