Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're studying Middle English literature, understanding dialects isn't just about memorizing regional differences—it's about grasping how language variation reflects political power, cultural contact, and literary prestige. The dialect a medieval author wrote in reveals everything from Viking settlement patterns to Norman administrative influence to which regions held economic and cultural authority. You're being tested on your ability to connect linguistic features to their historical causes and to explain why certain dialects gained prestige while others remained regional.
These five dialects also demonstrate a key principle in literary history: standardization is a social process, not a natural evolution. The East Midland dialect didn't become the basis for Standard English because it was inherently "better"—it won out due to London's political dominance, the presence of major universities, and the influence of writers like Chaucer. Don't just memorize which dialect has which sound changes—know what each dialect tells us about regional identity, language contact, and the politics of literary production.
The Viking invasions of the 9th-10th centuries left lasting linguistic fingerprints, particularly in northern and eastern England where Danelaw territories were established.
Compare: Northern vs. East Midland—both show Scandinavian contact, but Northern retained more Norse features while East Midland absorbed more French influence. If an FRQ asks about dialect prestige, East Midland's path to standardization is your best example.
Some regions, particularly in the west and south, maintained stronger continuity with Old English forms, either through geographic isolation or resistance to outside linguistic influence.
Compare: West Midland vs. Southern—both preserved Old English features, but West Midland maintained them in relative isolation while Southern forms actively shaped the emerging standard through London's influence. This distinction matters for understanding how standardization worked geographically.
Smaller dialect areas demonstrate how local communities maintained distinct linguistic identities even as broader regional patterns emerged.
Compare: Kentish vs. East Midland—both influenced London English, but Kentish remained a marked "regional" variety while East Midland features became the unmarked standard. This shows how proximity to power centers doesn't guarantee prestige.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Scandinavian influence | Northern, East Midland |
| Old English retention | West Midland, Kentish |
| Basis for Standard English | East Midland |
| Alliterative verse tradition | Northern, West Midland, Southern |
| French vocabulary integration | East Midland, Southern |
| Regional identity markers | Kentish, Northern |
| Major literary figures | East Midland (Chaucer), Southern (Langland), West Midland (Pearl-poet) |
Which two dialects show the strongest evidence of Scandinavian language contact, and what specific features demonstrate this influence?
Why did the East Midland dialect become the basis for Standard English rather than the Southern dialect, given that London is technically in the South?
Compare and contrast the West Midland and Kentish dialects in terms of their preservation of Old English features and their relationship to literary prestige.
If an FRQ asked you to explain how Chaucer's Canterbury Tales reflects medieval attitudes toward dialect variation, which specific examples would you use?
What does the Northern dialect's retention of Scandinavian loanwords reveal about the relationship between political history and linguistic change in medieval England?