Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Memory isn't just one thing—it's a collection of systems, processes, and structures that cognitive psychologists have spent decades trying to map. You're being tested on your ability to distinguish between these models and explain why each one matters for understanding how information gets encoded, stored, and retrieved. The models here represent fundamentally different ways of conceptualizing memory: some focus on structural components (what memory is made of), others on processing dynamics (how information moves through the system), and still others on organizational principles (how knowledge gets structured and connected).
Don't just memorize the names and components of each model—know what problem each model was designed to solve and how they relate to each other. Can you explain why Baddeley's working memory model was an improvement over the original multi-store model? Can you articulate the difference between structural and processing approaches to memory? These are the kinds of comparative questions that show up on exams, especially in FRQs asking you to evaluate or apply memory theories to real-world scenarios.
These models propose that memory consists of distinct stores or systems, each with unique characteristics and functions. The key insight is that different types of information are handled by specialized components.
Compare: Atkinson-Shiffrin vs. Baddeley—both are structural models, but Atkinson-Shiffrin treats STM as a single passive store while Baddeley breaks it into active, specialized components. If an FRQ asks why someone can remember a phone number while navigating a room, Baddeley's model explains this better.
These models shift focus from where information is stored to how it's processed. The depth and type of encoding matter more than time spent rehearsing.
Compare: Levels of Processing vs. Dual Coding—both emphasize encoding quality over storage duration, but Levels of Processing focuses on semantic depth while Dual Coding focuses on representational format. Use Levels of Processing for explaining why studying for meaning beats rote memorization; use Dual Coding for explaining why flashcards with images outperform text-only cards.
These models conceptualize memory as interconnected nodes rather than separate stores. Retrieval depends on activation patterns spreading through a web of associations.
Compare: Spreading Activation vs. Connectionist Models—both use network metaphors, but Spreading Activation focuses on semantic relationships between concepts while Connectionist Models emphasize the neural-like mechanics of how activation patterns emerge. Spreading Activation is better for explaining priming; Connectionist Models are better for explaining how memories can be partial or reconstructed.
These models explain how prior knowledge shapes the encoding and retrieval of new information. What you already know determines what you can learn and remember.
Compare: Schema Theory vs. Episodic/Semantic Model—Schema Theory explains how organized knowledge structures influence memory processing, while the Episodic/Semantic distinction categorizes types of long-term memory content. Use Schema Theory to explain memory distortions and reconstructive errors; use the Episodic/Semantic distinction to explain why you can know facts about your childhood without remembering specific events.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Structural/Store-Based Models | Atkinson-Shiffrin, Baddeley's Working Memory, Tulving's SPI |
| Processing-Based Models | Levels of Processing, Dual Coding Theory |
| Network/Connectionist Models | Spreading Activation, PDP, Connectionist Models |
| Knowledge Organization | Schema Theory, Episodic/Semantic Memory |
| Explains Encoding Differences | Levels of Processing, Dual Coding |
| Explains Retrieval Mechanisms | Spreading Activation, Connectionist Models |
| Explains Memory Distortions | Schema Theory |
| Explains Multitasking Limits | Baddeley's Working Memory |
Both the Levels of Processing model and Dual Coding Theory emphasize encoding quality—what distinguishes their explanations for why some information is remembered better than others?
If a patient with brain damage can still recall general facts but cannot remember personal experiences, which model best explains this dissociation, and what memory systems are affected?
Compare and contrast the Atkinson-Shiffrin model with Baddeley's Working Memory model. What limitation of the original model did Baddeley's revision address?
A student uses the method of loci (imagining items placed in familiar locations) to memorize a list. Which two memory models best explain why this technique works?
An FRQ asks you to explain why eyewitness testimony can be unreliable. Which memory model would you use, and what specific mechanism would you describe?