Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Market research isn't just about collecting data—it's about understanding why consumers behave the way they do and how that knowledge translates into strategic advantage. You're being tested on your ability to match the right research method to the right business question, whether that's exploring unmet needs, validating a product concept, or optimizing campaign performance. The methods you'll learn here connect directly to core marketing concepts like consumer behavior, segmentation, positioning, and the marketing mix.
Don't fall into the trap of memorizing definitions. Instead, focus on understanding what type of insight each method produces—qualitative depth vs. quantitative breadth, stated preferences vs. observed behavior, exploratory vs. confirmatory research. When you encounter an exam question, ask yourself: What does this business actually need to learn, and which method delivers that answer most effectively?
These methods rely on consumers articulating their thoughts, preferences, and experiences. The underlying principle is that people can accurately report their own motivations and behaviors when asked the right questions in the right format.
Compare: Surveys vs. Interviews—both ask consumers directly, but surveys prioritize breadth and statistical power while interviews prioritize depth and nuance. If an exam question asks about understanding how many consumers prefer something, think surveys; if it asks about understanding why, think interviews.
These methods capture what consumers actually do rather than what they say they do. The core insight is that stated preferences often diverge from real behavior, and observational methods close that gap.
Compare: Observational Research vs. Ethnographic Studies—both watch rather than ask, but observational research focuses on specific behaviors while ethnography captures the broader cultural ecosystem. Ethnography answers "what role does this product play in someone's life?" rather than just "how do they use it?"
These methods use controlled experiments and statistical analysis to determine what actually works. The principle here is empirical validation—letting data rather than assumptions guide marketing decisions.
Compare: A/B Testing vs. Conjoint Analysis—both optimize marketing decisions through data, but A/B testing evaluates existing options in real-world conditions while conjoint analysis models hypothetical trade-offs to design better options. A/B testing tells you which of two ads performs better; conjoint analysis tells you what product configuration consumers would value most.
These methods extract insights from data that already exists, whether from internal systems or external sources. The strategic advantage is speed and cost-efficiency—you're mining value from information that's already been collected.
Compare: Secondary Data Analysis vs. Social Media Listening—both leverage existing information, but secondary data provides structured, historical perspective while social listening captures unstructured, real-time conversation. Secondary data helps you understand where the market has been; social listening shows you where it's heading right now.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Quantitative breadth | Surveys, A/B Testing, Conjoint Analysis |
| Qualitative depth | Interviews, Focus Groups, Ethnographic Studies |
| Stated preferences | Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups |
| Observed behavior | Observational Research, Ethnographic Studies, A/B Testing |
| Exploratory research | Focus Groups, Ethnographic Studies, Interviews |
| Confirmatory research | Surveys, A/B Testing, Conjoint Analysis |
| Real-time insights | Social Media Listening, A/B Testing, Observational Research |
| Cost-efficient methods | Secondary Data Analysis, Social Media Listening, Customer Feedback Analysis |
A company wants to understand why customers abandon their shopping carts. Which two methods would provide the deepest insight into underlying motivations, and how would their findings differ?
Compare and contrast surveys and observational research. In what situation would observational research reveal insights that a survey would miss?
A startup is designing a new product and needs to determine which combination of features will maximize consumer appeal. Which method should they use, and what type of data will it produce?
Which three methods rely primarily on data that already exists rather than new data collection? What are the trade-offs of using these approaches?
An FRQ asks you to recommend a research approach for a company launching a product in an unfamiliar cultural market. Which method would you choose, and how would you justify it over alternatives like surveys or focus groups?