Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Market research isn't just about collecting data—it's about making smarter business decisions with less risk. On exams, you're being tested on your ability to match the right methodology to the right business problem. Can you distinguish when a company needs statistical validation versus deep consumer insights? Do you understand why observing behavior often reveals truths that asking questions cannot? These distinctions matter because real business decisions—product launches, pricing strategies, market entry—depend on choosing the appropriate research approach.
The methodologies below demonstrate core principles: quantitative vs. qualitative data, primary vs. secondary research, controlled vs. naturalistic observation, and active vs. passive data collection. Don't just memorize what each method does—know when to use it, what type of data it produces, and what limitations it carries. That's what separates a surface-level answer from one that earns full marks.
These methodologies generate numerical data that can be statistically analyzed, compared across groups, and used to identify patterns at scale. The underlying principle is standardization—asking the same questions the same way to enable meaningful comparisons.
Compare: Surveys vs. Online Analytics—both generate quantitative data, but surveys capture stated preferences while analytics reveal actual behavior. If an FRQ asks about the gap between what customers say and what they do, this distinction is your answer.
These approaches prioritize depth over breadth, generating rich insights about motivations, attitudes, and decision-making processes. The goal is understanding context and meaning rather than measuring frequency or magnitude.
Compare: Focus Groups vs. Interviews—both gather qualitative data, but focus groups leverage group dynamics while interviews provide individual depth. Choose focus groups when you want participants to build on each other's ideas; choose interviews when social pressure might suppress honest responses.
These methodologies capture behavior as it naturally occurs, bypassing the biases inherent in self-reported data. The core insight is that people often can't accurately describe their own behavior—but researchers can document it directly.
Compare: Observational Research vs. Social Media Listening—both capture behavior without direct questioning, but observational research documents physical actions while social listening tracks digital expressions. Use observation for in-store behavior; use listening for brand perception and trending conversations.
These approaches analyze data that already exists rather than generating new primary data. The advantage is efficiency—faster insights at lower cost—but researchers must evaluate data quality and relevance carefully.
Compare: Secondary Data Analysis vs. Customer Feedback Analysis—both leverage existing information, but secondary data comes from external sources while feedback analysis uses internal customer data. Secondary data helps you understand the market; feedback analysis helps you understand your customers specifically.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Quantitative/Statistical Data | Surveys, Experimental Research, Online Analytics |
| Qualitative/In-Depth Insights | Focus Groups, Interviews, Ethnographic Studies |
| Behavior vs. Self-Report | Observational Research, Online Analytics, Social Media Listening |
| Primary Research (New Data) | Surveys, Focus Groups, Interviews, Experiments |
| Secondary Research (Existing Data) | Secondary Data Analysis, Customer Feedback Analysis |
| Establishing Causation | Experimental Research |
| Real-Time/Passive Collection | Online Analytics, Social Media Listening |
| Exploratory/Discovery Research | Ethnographic Studies, Focus Groups |
A company wants to know why customers abandon their shopping carts. Which two methodologies would best uncover the underlying motivations, and what type of data would each produce?
Compare and contrast surveys and online analytics. In what situation would their findings contradict each other, and which would you trust more for predicting actual purchase behavior?
A startup is entering a new cultural market and wants to identify unmet needs that existing competitors haven't addressed. Which methodology is most appropriate, and why would surveys be insufficient here?
If an FRQ asks you to design a research plan for testing whether a new packaging design increases sales, which methodology must you include to establish causation? What variables would you control?
A brand manager notices negative sentiment trending on social media. Which two methodologies should she use together to understand both the scope of the problem (how widespread) and the root cause (why customers are upset)?