Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Legal ethics rules aren't just bureaucratic guidelines—they're the foundation of the entire legal system's legitimacy. When you're tested on professional responsibility, you're being asked to demonstrate that you understand why these rules exist and how they interact with each other. The Model Rules of Professional Conduct establish duties that sometimes conflict: your obligation to your client versus your duty to the court, your need to maintain confidentiality versus your responsibility to prevent harm. Mastering these tensions is what separates students who memorize rules from those who actually understand legal ethics.
Think of these rules as falling into three categories: duties to clients (confidentiality, competence, loyalty), duties to the legal system (candor, fairness, honesty), and duties to the profession itself (independence, proper licensing, ethical marketing). On exams, you'll often face scenarios where these duties collide—a client who wants you to stay silent about fraud, opposing counsel who's playing dirty, or a lucrative case with a hidden conflict. Don't just memorize what each rule says—know which duty category it serves and when it might yield to another obligation.
These rules establish the core obligations that define the attorney-client relationship. The fiduciary nature of this relationship means clients must be able to trust their lawyers completely—with their secrets, their interests, and their legal futures.
Compare: Duty of Confidentiality vs. Attorney-Client Privilege—both protect client information, but confidentiality is an ethical obligation covering all representation-related information, while privilege is an evidentiary protection limited to communications seeking legal advice. If an essay asks about disclosure, identify which protection applies first.
Compare: Confidentiality vs. Conflict of Interest—both protect client interests, but confidentiality guards information while conflict rules guard loyalty. A lawyer might maintain perfect confidentiality while still violating conflict rules by representing adverse parties.
These rules ensure that lawyers serve as officers of the court, not just zealous advocates. The adversarial system only works when all participants play by the same rules of honesty and fair dealing.
Compare: Candor to the Tribunal vs. Fairness to Opposing Counsel—candor focuses on truthfulness (don't lie to the court), while fairness focuses on conduct (don't cheat your opponent). Both can be violated in the same act, like hiding discoverable evidence.
These rules protect the legal profession's integrity and public trust. Self-regulation is a privilege that depends on lawyers policing their own ranks effectively.
Compare: Professional Independence vs. Competence—independence protects judgment (making your own decisions), while competence protects quality (making good decisions). A lawyer could be highly competent but compromise independence by letting a client dictate strategy.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Client Information Protection | Duty of Confidentiality, Attorney-Client Privilege |
| Client Loyalty | Conflict of Interest Rules, Professional Independence |
| Quality of Representation | Competence and Diligence |
| Honesty to Courts | Candor to the Tribunal |
| Fair Dealing | Fairness to Opposing Party, Truthfulness in Statements |
| Professional Gatekeeping | Unauthorized Practice of Law |
| Ethical Marketing | Advertising and Solicitation Rules |
| Self-Correction Duties | Candor to Tribunal (duty to correct), Conflict Rules (ongoing monitoring) |
A client tells you information that, if disclosed, would prevent financial harm to a third party. Which two rules are in tension, and how does the Model Rules framework resolve this conflict?
Compare and contrast the duty of confidentiality with attorney-client privilege. In what situation might one apply but not the other?
Your firm's largest client pressures you to take a litigation position you believe is legally frivolous. Which two ethics rules does this scenario implicate, and what should you do?
A lawyer discovers that a witness she called gave false testimony, though she didn't know it was false at the time. Which rule applies, and what are her obligations?
Identify which category of duty (client, system, or profession) each of the following rules primarily serves: candor to the tribunal, conflict of interest, unauthorized practice of law. For one of these, explain how it might also serve a secondary category.