Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
International trade regulations aren't just bureaucratic hurdles—they're the architecture that determines whether your supply chain runs smoothly or grinds to a halt at a port somewhere. You're being tested on your ability to understand why these regulations exist, how they interact with each other, and what happens when companies get them wrong. The concepts here—trade liberalization, protectionism, compliance risk, and competitive advantage—show up repeatedly in exam questions about global sourcing decisions, landed cost calculations, and market entry strategies.
Don't just memorize a list of regulations. Know which ones reduce barriers versus which ones create them, understand the difference between multilateral frameworks and bilateral agreements, and be ready to explain how a single shipment might trigger multiple regulatory requirements simultaneously. When an FRQ asks you to evaluate a company's international expansion strategy, these regulations are your toolkit for identifying risks and opportunities.
These regulations establish the baseline rules that govern international trade among many countries simultaneously. They create predictability and standardization across borders, reducing transaction costs for businesses operating globally.
Compare: WTO rules vs. Incoterms—both create standardization in international trade, but WTO governs government-to-government relationships while Incoterms govern business-to-business transaction terms. If asked about reducing trade friction, WTO addresses tariffs; Incoterms addresses contractual clarity.
These agreements create special trading relationships between specific countries or regions. They offer competitive advantages to qualifying goods but require careful compliance to access benefits.
Compare: FTAs vs. Rules of Origin—FTAs create the opportunity for tariff savings, but rules of origin determine eligibility. An FRQ might ask you to evaluate whether a company's supply chain configuration actually qualifies for the FTA benefits they're claiming.
These regulations control what crosses borders and at what cost. They represent the practical implementation of trade policy, directly affecting shipment timing, costs, and compliance burden.
Compare: Tariffs vs. Anti-dumping duties—standard tariffs apply uniformly to product categories, while anti-dumping duties target specific companies or countries engaged in unfair pricing. Both increase costs, but anti-dumping duties signal a hostile trade relationship that may affect long-term sourcing strategy.
These regulations prioritize national security and foreign policy over commercial interests. Non-compliance carries the most severe consequences, including criminal liability for individuals.
Compare: Export controls vs. Sanctions—export controls restrict what you can sell (specific products and technologies), while sanctions restrict who you can sell to (specific countries, entities, or individuals). A single transaction might violate both if you're shipping controlled technology to a sanctioned party.
These regulations ensure companies can compete on merit rather than lose market share to unfair practices. They create legal remedies for businesses harmed by counterfeiting, piracy, or subsidized competition.
Compare: IP rights vs. Anti-dumping duties—both protect domestic businesses from unfair competition, but IP rights address copying (taking your innovation) while anti-dumping addresses pricing (undercutting your margins). Strong IP protection matters most for differentiated products; anti-dumping matters most for commoditized goods.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Trade liberalization | WTO rules, Free Trade Agreements |
| Transaction standardization | Incoterms, Rules of Origin |
| Cost/barrier mechanisms | Customs tariffs, Import licensing, Anti-dumping duties |
| National security controls | Export controls, Sanctions and embargoes |
| Preferential access | FTAs, Rules of Origin |
| Fair competition protection | IP rights, Anti-dumping duties, Countervailing duties |
| Compliance risk (criminal) | Export controls, Sanctions |
| Compliance risk (financial) | Customs regulations, Rules of Origin |
Which two regulations work together to determine whether a product qualifies for reduced tariff rates, and what happens if a company claims benefits incorrectly?
Compare export controls and sanctions: How do they differ in what they restrict, and why might a single transaction violate both simultaneously?
A company discovers a foreign competitor is selling identical products at 40% below production cost. Which regulation provides a remedy, and what must the company prove to trigger enforcement?
If an FRQ presents a scenario where a U.S. company wants to source components from Vietnam for assembly in Mexico before shipping to the U.S., which regulations determine the final tariff rate paid?
Rank these compliance failures by severity of potential consequences: (a) using outdated Incoterms, (b) misclassifying HS codes, (c) shipping dual-use technology without a license. Explain your reasoning.