Key International Environmental Agreements

---

Why This Matters

International environmental agreements represent the primary mechanism through which nations coordinate responses to transboundary environmental challenges—and understanding them is essential for the AP Environmental Science exam. You're being tested not just on treaty names and dates, but on the regulatory approaches each agreement employs, the environmental problems they address, and how they demonstrate principles like common but differentiated responsibilities, the precautionary principle, and adaptive management.

These agreements also reveal how environmental policy evolves over time. Notice how climate treaties progressed from voluntary frameworks to binding targets to nationally determined contributions—each shift reflects lessons learned about what motivates compliance. When you study these treaties, don't just memorize facts; know what type of environmental problem each addresses (atmospheric, biodiversity, waste, marine) and what policy mechanism it uses (phase-outs, trading systems, protected designations, trade restrictions).

---

Atmospheric Protection Agreements

These agreements tackle pollutants that affect the global atmosphere—whether depleting the ozone layer or altering the climate system. Because atmospheric pollution crosses borders freely, these treaties require near-universal participation to succeed.

Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer

• Adopted in 1987 to phase out ozone-depleting substances (ODS)—considered the most successful environmental treaty ever enacted
• Achieved universal ratification by all 198 UN member states, demonstrating that global cooperation is possible when science is clear and alternatives exist
• Ozone layer recovery is measurable—the hole is projected to heal by mid-century, proving that international agreements can reverse environmental damage

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

• Established in 1992 as the foundational framework for all subsequent climate negotiations, including Kyoto and Paris
• Goal: stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system
• Framework treaty design—sets objectives and principles but leaves specific targets to subsequent protocols, allowing flexibility over time

Kyoto Protocol

• Adopted in 1997 with binding emission reduction targets for industrialized (Annex I) countries based on 1990 levels
• Introduced market-based mechanisms—emissions trading, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), and Joint Implementation (JI)—as cost-effective compliance tools
• Established "common but differentiated responsibilities"—recognizing that developed nations bear greater historical responsibility for emissions

Paris Agreement

• Adopted in 2015 with the goal of limiting warming to well below 2°C, with efforts toward 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels
• Requires nationally determined contributions (NDCs) from all countries—a bottom-up approach replacing Kyoto's top-down targets
• Built-in ratchet mechanism—countries must submit increasingly ambitious NDCs every five years, creating adaptive management

---

Biodiversity and Species Protection

These agreements protect living resources through habitat conservation, sustainable use principles, and trade regulation. They recognize that biodiversity loss is often driven by economic pressures and require balancing conservation with development needs.

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

• Established in 1992 with three core objectives—conserve biodiversity, promote sustainable use, and ensure fair sharing of benefits from genetic resources
• Recognizes intrinsic value of biodiversity—a philosophical shift from viewing nature purely as a resource for human exploitation
• Emphasizes indigenous and local community participation—acknowledging traditional ecological knowledge in conservation strategies

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES)

• Adopted in 1973 to regulate international wildlife trade—uses a permit system to control commerce in threatened species
• Three-appendix system provides tiered protection—Appendix I (banned trade), Appendix II (regulated trade), Appendix III (country-specific monitoring)
• Enforcement relies on member nations—requires domestic legislation and border controls, making compliance uneven across countries

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

• Established in 1971 as the first modern intergovernmental environmental treaty—focuses specifically on wetland ecosystems
• Creates "Ramsar Sites" designation—wetlands of international importance that countries commit to conserve and manage wisely
• Recognizes ecosystem services—wetlands provide flood control, water filtration, carbon storage, and biodiversity habitat

---

Pollution and Waste Management

These treaties address the transboundary movement and environmental persistence of hazardous materials. They typically use phase-out schedules, prior informed consent requirements, and environmentally sound management standards.

Basel Convention on Hazardous Wastes

• Adopted in 1989 to control transboundary movement of hazardous waste—specifically targeting dumping from developed to developing nations
• Requires prior informed consent (PIC)—exporting countries must obtain permission before shipping hazardous materials across borders
• Promotes waste hierarchy principles—emphasizes reduction at source, then recycling and recovery, before disposal

Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

• Adopted in 2001 to eliminate or restrict persistent organic pollutants (POPs)—chemicals that bioaccumulate and persist in the environment for decades
• Originally targeted the "dirty dozen"—twelve POPs including DDT, PCBs, and dioxins, with new chemicals added through ongoing review
• Addresses environmental justice concerns—POPs travel globally through air and water, affecting populations far from emission sources

---

Marine and Ocean Governance

This comprehensive framework addresses the unique challenges of governing international waters and marine resources, which exist largely beyond national jurisdiction.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

• Adopted in 1982 as the "constitution for the oceans"—establishes legal framework for all marine activities and resources
• Defines maritime zones—territorial seas (12 nautical miles), exclusive economic zones (EEZs, 200 nautical miles), and international waters with specific rights in each
• Balances resource rights with conservation duties—nations can exploit EEZ resources but must protect marine environments and cooperate on shared stocks

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two agreements both address climate change but use fundamentally different approaches to setting targets? What distinguishes their mechanisms?

2. If an FRQ asks you to identify the most successful international environmental agreement and explain why, which treaty would you choose and what evidence supports your answer?

3. Compare the CBD and CITES: How do their scopes differ, and why might CITES be easier to enforce despite being narrower?

4. Which agreements use the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities," and what does this principle mean for how obligations are distributed among nations?

5. A question asks about agreements that protect ecosystems rather than regulate specific pollutants—which three treaties would you discuss, and what type of ecosystem does each address?