Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you see questions about international development on the AP exam, you're being tested on more than just knowing what these organizations do—you need to understand how different types of institutions approach development and why certain strategies work in specific contexts. These organizations represent fundamentally different philosophies: some prioritize financial stability and market integration, others focus on sector-specific interventions, and still others emphasize regional cooperation and integration. Understanding these distinctions helps you analyze development policy questions with nuance.
The organizations in this guide also illustrate key tensions in development economics: structural adjustment vs. poverty-first approaches, global institutions vs. regional banks, and economic growth vs. human development metrics. Don't just memorize acronyms—know what each organization reveals about competing development theories and why a country might turn to one institution over another depending on its specific challenges.
These organizations operate worldwide and focus on macroeconomic stability and large-scale development financing. They represent the post-WWII international economic order and often come with policy conditions attached to their assistance.
Compare: World Bank vs. IMF—both are Bretton Woods institutions headquartered in Washington, but the World Bank funds long-term development projects while the IMF handles short-term financial crises. If an FRQ asks about a country facing a currency crisis, think IMF; if it's about building schools or roads, think World Bank.
UN-affiliated organizations take a human development approach, prioritizing health, hunger, and governance over purely economic metrics. They work through country-level programs and set global development agendas.
Compare: UNDP vs. World Bank—both work on poverty reduction, but UNDP emphasizes human development metrics and governance while the World Bank focuses on economic growth and infrastructure financing. UNDP's HDI approach directly challenges GDP-centric development models.
These institutions apply the multilateral development bank model to specific geographic regions, allowing for tailored approaches that reflect local economic conditions and priorities. They often emphasize regional integration alongside national development.
Compare: Regional banks vs. World Bank—regional development banks like ADB, AfDB, and IDB offer similar services to the World Bank but with regional expertise and often faster, more flexible lending. Countries may prefer regional banks for projects requiring local knowledge or when World Bank conditions are too restrictive.
This organization focuses on rules-based international commerce rather than direct financial assistance, operating on the theory that trade liberalization drives development.
Compare: WTO vs. IMF—both promote market-oriented policies, but WTO focuses specifically on trade rules while IMF addresses monetary and fiscal policy. A country might face WTO disputes over tariffs while simultaneously negotiating an IMF loan for currency stabilization.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Long-term development lending | World Bank, ADB, AfDB, IDB |
| Short-term crisis financing | IMF |
| Human development approach | UNDP, WHO, FAO |
| Regional integration focus | ADB, AfDB, IDB, EBRD |
| Trade liberalization | WTO |
| Health and hunger sectors | WHO, FAO |
| Transition/market reform | EBRD, IMF |
| Conditionality and structural adjustment | IMF, World Bank |
A country is experiencing a sudden currency crisis and needs emergency funds within weeks. Which organization would it approach, and why would the World Bank be a poor choice for this situation?
Compare the UNDP's approach to development with the World Bank's. What fundamental difference in how they measure development success explains their different priorities?
Why might an African nation prefer to work with the AfDB rather than the World Bank for a regional transportation project connecting multiple countries?
Which two organizations both promote market-oriented economic policies but focus on completely different mechanisms (trade rules vs. monetary policy)? How might a country interact with both simultaneously?
If an FRQ asks you to evaluate the strengths and limitations of conditionality in development assistance, which organizations would provide the strongest examples—and what criticisms would you need to address?