Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Habitat fragmentation isn't just about losing land—it's about how the spatial arrangement of remaining habitat fundamentally changes ecological dynamics. When you're tested on this topic, you're being assessed on your understanding of population genetics, species interactions, ecosystem function, and landscape ecology all at once. The AP exam loves fragmentation because it connects so many core concepts: minimum viable populations, genetic drift, edge effects, and metapopulation theory.
Don't just memorize a list of impacts. For each effect below, know the underlying mechanism and how it connects to broader conservation principles. Ask yourself: Why does this happen? What makes fragmented habitats different from intact ones? That conceptual understanding is what separates a 3 from a 5.
Fragmentation doesn't just shrink habitat—it fundamentally alters the environmental conditions within remaining patches. The ratio of edge to interior habitat increases dramatically as patches get smaller, creating new microclimates and exposure patterns.
Compare: Edge effects vs. microclimate changes—both alter physical conditions, but edge effects emphasize biotic interactions (predation, competition) while microclimate changes focus on abiotic shifts (temperature, humidity). FRQs often ask you to distinguish between physical and biological consequences of fragmentation.
When habitat becomes fragmented, populations shrink and become isolated. Small population size triggers a cascade of demographic and genetic problems that can push species toward extinction even when some habitat remains.
Compare: Isolation vs. genetic drift—isolation is the spatial pattern that restricts movement, while genetic drift is the evolutionary process that results from small population size. Both can occur independently, but fragmentation typically causes both simultaneously. Know this distinction for genetics-focused FRQs.
Fragmentation doesn't affect species in isolation—it rewires the web of interactions that structure ecological communities. When some species disappear or change in abundance, the effects ripple through food webs and mutualistic networks.
Compare: Biodiversity loss vs. invasive species—both reduce native species, but through different mechanisms. Biodiversity loss is primarily about habitat-driven extinction, while invasion involves competitive replacement. Fragments often experience both simultaneously, compounding conservation challenges.
Beyond individual species, fragmentation compromises the ecological processes that maintain healthy ecosystems. Landscape connectivity determines whether ecosystems function as integrated wholes or as degraded, isolated remnants.
Compare: Ecosystem process disruption vs. reduced connectivity—process disruption describes functional changes within patches, while connectivity loss describes structural changes across the landscape. Effective conservation requires addressing both: protecting ecosystem function within reserves and maintaining movement between them.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Abiotic changes | Edge effects, microclimate changes |
| Population genetics | Genetic drift, inbreeding, isolation |
| Demographic effects | Reduced habitat area, isolation of populations |
| Community dynamics | Altered species interactions, decreased biodiversity |
| Invasion ecology | Increased vulnerability to invasive species |
| Ecosystem function | Disruption of ecosystem processes |
| Landscape ecology | Reduced connectivity and dispersal |
| Conservation applications | Wildlife corridors, metapopulation management |
Which two impacts most directly involve changes to the physical environment rather than biological responses, and what distinguishes them from each other?
A population shows declining heterozygosity and increased expression of genetic disorders over several generations. Which two fragmentation impacts explain this pattern, and how are they mechanistically connected?
Compare and contrast how invasive species establishment and native biodiversity loss each reduce species richness in fragments—what's the key difference in mechanism?
An FRQ describes a forest fragment where understory birds have declined but edge-dwelling species have increased. Which impacts would you discuss, and how would you connect them to explain the community shift?
Why might restoring connectivity between fragments address multiple other impacts on this list? Identify at least three impacts that improved dispersal could help mitigate and explain the mechanism for each.