Key Human Rights Conventions

Why This Matters

Human rights conventions form the backbone of international law that you'll encounter throughout this course—they're where state sovereignty, international cooperation, and individual rights intersect. When you study these documents, you're really studying how the international community has tried to solve a fundamental tension: states want to maintain control over their own affairs, but the global community increasingly demands minimum standards for how governments treat people. This tension shows up constantly on exams.

You're being tested on more than just names and dates. The AP exam wants you to understand how these conventions differ in their enforcement mechanisms, why some rights are considered immediately enforceable while others are progressively realized, and how regional systems compare to global ones. Don't just memorize which convention covers which rights—know what concept each document illustrates about international law and organization.

---

Foundational Documents: The Universal Framework

These documents establish the core principles that all subsequent conventions build upon. The UDHR created the moral framework; the twin covenants made it legally binding.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

• Adopted in 1948 by the UN General Assembly—the first international statement defining fundamental human rights for all people
• 30 articles covering civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights—a comprehensive but non-binding declaration
• Foundational influence on virtually every subsequent human rights treaty and many national constitutions worldwide

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

• Adopted in 1966 to make UDHR principles legally binding—focuses on negative rights that require governments to refrain from interference
• Immediate obligations for states on rights like free speech, fair trial, and protection against torture and arbitrary detention
• Human Rights Committee monitors compliance through state reports and individual complaints under the Optional Protocol

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)

• Adopted in 1966 alongside ICCPR—focuses on positive rights requiring government action and resources
• Progressive realization standard acknowledges that rights to work, education, health, and adequate living standards require time and resources to achieve
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights oversees implementation but with weaker enforcement than ICCPR mechanisms

---

Anti-Discrimination Conventions: Targeting Specific Vulnerabilities

These conventions address discrimination against particular groups, reflecting the international community's recognition that universal documents weren't sufficient to protect vulnerable populations.

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)

• Adopted in 1965—actually predates the ICCPR/ICESCR and was the first major UN human rights treaty
• Defines racial discrimination comprehensively and obligates states to actively pursue elimination policies, not just avoid discrimination
• Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) reviews state reports and can receive individual complaints

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)

• Adopted in 1979—often called the international bill of rights for women
• Defines discrimination against women and mandates equality in political, economic, social, and family life
• CEDAW Committee monitors implementation, though the convention has more reservations filed than almost any other human rights treaty

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)

• Adopted in 2006—the most recent major human rights convention, reflecting evolving understanding of disability rights
• Social model of disability emphasizes removing barriers to accessibility, inclusion, and participation rather than "fixing" individuals
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities oversees implementation and promotes the shift from charity-based to rights-based approaches

---

Protection of Vulnerable Populations: Children and Migrants

These conventions protect groups whose vulnerability stems from age or status rather than identity characteristics.

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)

• Adopted in 1989—the most widely ratified human rights treaty in history (the U.S. is the only UN member that hasn't ratified it)
• "Best interests of the child" standard must guide all decisions affecting children—a principle that has influenced domestic law globally
• Comprehensive coverage of civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights specifically adapted for children's needs

International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families

• Adopted in 1990—addresses the growing phenomenon of labor migration across borders
• Protects labor rights, social security, and family unity for migrant workers regardless of legal status
• Committee on Migrant Workers monitors compliance, but the convention has low ratification rates, especially among major destination countries

---

Absolute Prohibitions: The Convention Against Torture

Some rights are considered so fundamental that they permit no exceptions—torture is the clearest example.

Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT)

• Adopted in 1984—establishes an absolute prohibition on torture that applies even during war or public emergencies
• Non-derogable right means states cannot suspend the prohibition under any circumstances—no "ticking time bomb" exceptions
• Committee Against Torture reviews state compliance and can investigate allegations, including through country visits

---

Regional Systems: The European Model

Regional human rights systems often provide stronger enforcement than global mechanisms because of greater political and cultural cohesion among member states.

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

• Adopted in 1950—predates most UN conventions and established the first international human rights court
• European Court of Human Rights can issue binding judgments against states and award compensation to victims—far stronger than UN treaty bodies
• Individual petition right allows any person to bring a case directly against a state, making it the most accessible international human rights mechanism

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two conventions were adopted together in 1966, and what is the key difference in how states must implement their obligations under each?

2. Compare the enforcement mechanisms of the ECHR with those of UN treaty bodies like the Human Rights Committee. Why is the European system generally considered more effective?

3. Both ICERD and CEDAW target discrimination against specific groups. What do they share in their approach, and how might the high number of reservations to CEDAW illustrate tensions between universal human rights and state sovereignty?

4. If an FRQ asked you to explain why some human rights conventions achieve near-universal ratification while others struggle, which two conventions would you compare and what factors would you cite?

5. The CAT establishes an absolute prohibition on torture with no exceptions. How does this differ from the approach taken by the ICCPR regarding rights during emergencies, and what does this tell us about the hierarchy of human rights in international law?