Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Greek philosophical schools aren't just ancient history—they're the foundation of Western thought, and you're being tested on how these thinkers approached fundamental questions about knowledge, ethics, reality, and the good life. The AP exam expects you to recognize not just what each school believed, but how their methods and conclusions differed. Understanding whether a philosopher trusted reason over observation, or valued inner tranquility over external achievement, reveals the deeper intellectual currents that shaped literature, politics, and culture for millennia.
These schools also speak to each other across centuries, building on, critiquing, and transforming earlier ideas. Neoplatonism reimagines Platonism; Stoicism and Epicureanism offer competing answers to the same question about happiness. Don't just memorize definitions—know what problem each school was trying to solve and what method they used to solve it. That's what separates a 3 from a 5.
These schools argue that ultimate reality exists beyond the physical world we perceive—whether as abstract Forms, mathematical structures, or divine emanation.
Compare: Platonism vs. Neoplatonism—both prioritize transcendent reality over the material world, but Neoplatonism adds a systematic hierarchy and emphasizes mystical union rather than intellectual contemplation alone. If an FRQ asks about the development of Greek thought, this evolution is your best example.
This approach grounds knowledge in observation of the natural world rather than abstract reasoning about invisible realities.
Compare: Platonism vs. Aristotelianism—both seek universal truth, but Plato looks upward to abstract Forms while Aristotle looks outward to the natural world. This is the fundamental divide in ancient epistemology and appears frequently on exams.
These Hellenistic schools focus less on metaphysics and more on a pressing practical question: how should we live to achieve tranquility and fulfillment?
Compare: Stoicism vs. Epicureanism—both seek inner peace and freedom from disturbance, but Stoics achieve it through accepting fate and focusing on virtue, while Epicureans pursue it through moderate pleasure and avoiding pain. This contrast is exam gold for questions about Hellenistic ethics.
These schools challenge conventional assumptions—whether about knowledge itself or about social values—pushing philosophy toward skepticism and countercultural living.
Compare: Cynicism vs. Skepticism—both reject conventional wisdom, but Cynics are certain that virtue and nature provide the answer, while Skeptics doubt even that. Cynicism is a radical lifestyle; Skepticism is a radical epistemology.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Transcendent reality / Forms | Platonism, Neoplatonism, Pythagoreanism |
| Empirical method | Aristotelianism |
| Virtue as highest good | Stoicism, Cynicism |
| Pleasure / tranquility as goal | Epicureanism, Skepticism |
| Soul's immortality | Platonism, Pythagoreanism, Neoplatonism |
| Acceptance of fate / limits | Stoicism, Skepticism |
| Rejection of social norms | Cynicism, Epicureanism |
| Mathematical / rational cosmos | Pythagoreanism, Stoicism |
Which two schools both emphasize the soul's immortality but differ in whether they ground reality in Forms or in mathematical relationships?
How do Stoicism and Epicureanism offer different solutions to the same problem of achieving inner peace?
If an FRQ asks you to trace the development of Platonic thought, which later school would you discuss, and what key concept did it add?
Compare and contrast Cynicism and Skepticism: both reject conventional beliefs, but what fundamentally distinguishes their approaches?
Aristotle famously broke with his teacher Plato. What methodological difference defines this break, and how does it affect each philosopher's approach to ethics?