Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Greek philosophy isn't just a list of old names and abstract ideas—it's the foundation of nearly every intellectual tradition you'll encounter in Western thought. When you study these thinkers, you're tracing the origins of ethics, metaphysics, epistemology, natural science, and political theory. The exam will test whether you understand how these philosophers responded to each other, built competing systems, and shaped the intellectual landscape of the ancient Mediterranean world.
Don't just memorize who said what. Focus on the philosophical problems each thinker was trying to solve and how their answers differed. You're being tested on your ability to connect ideas across thinkers—to explain why Parmenides and Heraclitus represent opposing views on reality, or how Epicureans and Stoics offered competing paths to the good life. Master the relationships between these philosophers, and you'll be ready for any comparative question the exam throws at you.
These three thinkers form the backbone of classical philosophy, each building on—and sometimes rejecting—his teacher's ideas. Their intellectual lineage (Socrates taught Plato, Plato taught Aristotle) represents the most influential philosophical succession in Western history.
Compare: Plato vs. Aristotle—both sought truth and the good life, but Plato looked upward to abstract Forms while Aristotle looked outward at the observable world. If an FRQ asks about competing epistemologies, this contrast is your best example.
Before Socrates turned philosophy toward ethics, earlier thinkers asked fundamental questions about what exists and what is real. These Pre-Socratic philosophers established the metaphysical debates that Plato and Aristotle would later address.
Compare: Heraclitus vs. Parmenides—the ultimate Pre-Socratic showdown. Heraclitus says everything changes; Parmenides says nothing does. This debate frames the central problem Plato tried to solve with his Forms.
Compare: Pythagoras vs. Democritus—both sought underlying principles of reality, but Pythagoras found mystical significance in mathematical relationships while Democritus proposed purely physical atoms. This split between mathematical idealism and material atomism echoes throughout ancient philosophy.
After Aristotle, philosophy became increasingly focused on practical ethics—how to live well in an uncertain world. These schools offered competing answers to the question: What is the path to happiness?
Compare: Epicureans vs. Stoics—both sought tranquility, but Epicureans pursued it through pleasure (carefully defined) and withdrawal from public life, while Stoics pursued it through virtue and acceptance of fate. This is the defining ethical debate of the Hellenistic period.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Metaphysics of change | Heraclitus (flux), Parmenides (permanence) |
| Theory of reality | Plato (Forms), Democritus (atoms), Pythagoras (numbers) |
| Ethical systems | Aristotle (virtue ethics), Epicurus (pleasure), Zeno (Stoic virtue) |
| Epistemology/method | Socrates (dialectic), Aristotle (empiricism), Plato (reason/recollection) |
| Political philosophy | Plato (philosopher-king), Aristotle (constitutional analysis) |
| Rejection of convention | Diogenes (Cynicism), Epicurus (withdrawal from politics) |
| Soul and afterlife | Pythagoras (transmigration), Plato (immortal soul), Epicurus (soul dissolves) |
Compare and contrast Heraclitus and Parmenides on the nature of reality. How did Plato's Theory of Forms attempt to resolve their disagreement?
Which two Hellenistic schools both aimed at achieving tranquility but differed on whether pleasure or virtue was the path to get there? Explain their key differences.
Identify the philosopher: He never wrote anything himself, was executed for "corrupting the youth," and developed a questioning method still used today. What was his core ethical teaching?
How does Aristotle's empirical approach represent a departure from Plato's rationalism? Give a specific example of how their methods differed.
If an FRQ asked you to discuss ancient philosophical responses to materialism, which three philosophers would provide the strongest examples—and would they support or challenge a materialist worldview?