Key Geophysical Instruments

Why This Matters

Geophysical instruments are the eyes and ears we use to "see" beneath Earth's surface and detect processes invisible to direct observation. When you're tested on these tools, you're really being tested on your understanding of the physical properties they measure—seismic wave propagation, gravitational anomalies, electromagnetic fields, and electrical conductivity. Each instrument exploits a specific physical principle to reveal something about subsurface structure, composition, or ongoing geological processes.

Don't just memorize what each instrument does—understand which physical property it measures and what geological questions it can answer. An FRQ might ask you to design a survey for a specific problem (finding groundwater, monitoring a volcano, locating a fault). Your job is to match the right tool to the right property. Master the underlying physics, and you'll be able to reason through any application they throw at you.

---

Seismic and Deformation Monitoring

These instruments detect ground motion and surface changes, revealing everything from earthquake dynamics to volcanic unrest. They work by measuring how Earth's surface moves—whether from passing seismic waves or slow crustal deformation.

Seismometer

• Measures ground velocity or acceleration from seismic waves—the fundamental tool for earthquake detection and characterization
• Records amplitude, frequency, and arrival times of P-waves, S-waves, and surface waves, enabling hypocenter location and magnitude calculation
• Reveals Earth's internal structure through seismic tomography; wave shadow zones proved the liquid outer core exists

Tiltmeter

• Detects microradians of surface inclination change—far more sensitive than any level you've used in a lab
• Monitors volcanic inflation and deflation as magma moves beneath the surface, providing eruption early warning
• Tracks landslide and subsidence hazards by measuring slow ground deformation before catastrophic failure

GPS Receiver

• Achieves millimeter-scale positioning precision using satellite signals—essential for measuring plate motion and crustal strain
• Quantifies tectonic deformation rates by tracking station positions over time; this is how we know plates move at fingernail-growth speeds
• Detects co-seismic and post-seismic displacement during and after earthquakes, revealing fault slip distribution

---

Potential Field Methods

These instruments measure gravity and magnetic fields that vary based on subsurface density and magnetic susceptibility. Anomalies in these fields point to geological structures, ore bodies, or voids hiding below.

Gravimeter

• Measures local gravitational acceleration variations down to microgals ($1 \, \mu\text{Gal} = 10^{-8} \, \text{m/s}^2$)
• Detects density contrasts in the subsurface—dense ore bodies create positive anomalies; voids and salt domes create negative ones
• Requires careful corrections for latitude, elevation, terrain, and tides before anomalies can be interpreted geologically

Magnetometer

• Measures total magnetic field intensity or vector components to map subsurface magnetic susceptibility variations
• Identifies igneous intrusions, faults, and ore deposits because mafic rocks and iron-bearing minerals create strong anomalies
• Essential for paleomagnetic studies that reconstruct plate motions and date seafloor spreading

Proton Precession Magnetometer

• Exploits nuclear magnetic resonance—protons in a hydrogen-rich fluid precess at a frequency proportional to ambient field strength
• Provides absolute field measurements without calibration drift, making it ideal for repeat surveys
• Highly portable and robust for field mapping of magnetic anomalies in mineral exploration and archaeology

---

Electrical and Electromagnetic Methods

These instruments probe electrical conductivity and resistivity of subsurface materials. Water content, clay minerals, and dissolved ions dramatically affect how easily current flows through rock and soil.

Electrical Resistivity Meter

• Injects current through electrodes and measures voltage drop to calculate apparent resistivity of subsurface layers
• Maps groundwater aquifers and contamination plumes because saturated, salty, or clay-rich zones conduct electricity well
• Array geometry controls depth penetration—wider electrode spacing probes deeper but sacrifices lateral resolution

Electromagnetic Induction Meter

• Induces eddy currents in the ground using a transmitter coil; a receiver coil measures the secondary magnetic field response
• No ground contact required—faster than resistivity for reconnaissance surveys over large areas
• Sensitive to conductive targets like ore bodies, buried metal, and saline groundwater; less effective in highly resistive terrain

---

Imaging and Direct Measurement

These tools provide high-resolution subsurface images or direct sampling of geological properties. They give you the detailed picture that potential field methods can't achieve.

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

• Transmits radar pulses and records reflections from interfaces where dielectric permittivity changes
• Achieves centimeter-scale resolution in the shallow subsurface—ideal for buried utilities, archaeological features, and sedimentary layers
• Depth penetration limited by conductivity—works great in dry sand, poorly in wet clay (signal attenuates rapidly)

Borehole Logging Tools

• Lowered into drilled holes to measure in-situ properties—resistivity, gamma ray, sonic velocity, density, and more
• Provides ground truth for surface geophysics by directly sampling the formations that cause anomalies
• Essential for petroleum exploration where logs determine porosity, permeability, fluid content, and lithology

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two instruments both measure ground motion but operate on completely different timescales? What types of geological hazards is each best suited to monitor?

2. You need to locate a buried metallic tank in clay-rich soil. Which instrument would perform poorly here, and why? What alternative would you choose?

3. Compare and contrast gravimeters and magnetometers: What physical property does each measure, and how would their anomaly maps differ over a mafic igneous intrusion versus a salt dome?

4. An FRQ asks you to design a groundwater contamination survey. Which instruments would you deploy, in what order, and what would each contribute to your interpretation?

5. Why do borehole logging tools remain essential even when we have sophisticated surface geophysical methods? What unique information do they provide?