Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Forecasting isn't just about predicting the future—it's about understanding why certain patterns emerge and how different variables interact over time. You're being tested on your ability to select the right model for specific data characteristics, whether that's handling seasonality, capturing nonlinear relationships, or working with limited historical data. The models in this guide represent fundamentally different approaches: some assume patterns repeat predictably, others model cause-and-effect relationships, and still others leverage machine learning to find hidden structures.
Don't just memorize model names and definitions. Know what type of data pattern each model handles best, when you'd choose one approach over another, and how models can be combined for better accuracy. Understanding the underlying mechanisms—stationarity requirements, weighting schemes, probabilistic frameworks—will help you tackle both multiple-choice questions and FRQ scenarios that ask you to justify model selection.
These models assume that historical patterns—trends, cycles, and seasonal fluctuations—will continue into the future. The core mechanism is decomposing time-ordered data into predictable components.
Compare: Moving Average vs. Exponential Smoothing—both smooth data to reveal patterns, but moving average weights all points in the window equally while exponential smoothing prioritizes recent observations. If an FRQ asks about adapting quickly to trend changes, exponential smoothing is your answer.
These models explicitly handle non-stationary data and periodic fluctuations. The key mechanism is transforming data or adding components to capture time-dependent structures.
Compare: ARIMA vs. Seasonal Models—standard ARIMA handles trends and autocorrelation but ignores periodic patterns, while seasonal models (like SARIMA) add explicit terms for recurring fluctuations. Choose seasonal models when your data shows clear calendar-driven cycles.
Rather than relying solely on historical patterns, these models examine how variables influence each other. The mechanism involves quantifying dependencies between predictors and outcomes.
Compare: Regression vs. Causal Models—regression quantifies associations between variables, while causal models attempt to establish why those relationships exist. Regression tells you X and Y move together; causal modeling tells you changing X will change Y.
These models handle complexity that traditional methods can't capture—nonlinear patterns, limited data, or situations requiring human expertise. The mechanisms range from artificial intelligence to probabilistic updating to expert judgment.
Compare: Neural Networks vs. Bayesian Models—both handle complexity, but neural networks require large datasets and produce point predictions, while Bayesian methods work with limited data and quantify uncertainty. Choose Bayesian when you need to communicate forecast confidence or have sparse data.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Smoothing & noise reduction | Moving Average, Exponential Smoothing |
| Handling non-stationarity | ARIMA (differencing component), Seasonal Models |
| Capturing seasonality | Seasonal Models, Triple Exponential Smoothing (Holt-Winters) |
| Variable relationships | Regression Models, Causal Models |
| Nonlinear patterns | Neural Network Models |
| Uncertainty quantification | Bayesian Forecasting Models |
| Limited/no historical data | Judgmental Methods, Bayesian Models |
| Short-term forecasting | Exponential Smoothing, Moving Average |
Which two models both use weighted combinations of past observations but differ in how they assign those weights? What's the key distinction?
You're forecasting quarterly retail sales that show clear holiday spikes. Which model category would you choose, and what parameters would you need to specify?
Compare and contrast regression models and causal models. In what situation would a regression forecast be misleading while a causal model would be appropriate?
A startup wants to forecast demand for a product category that didn't exist two years ago. Why might Bayesian or judgmental methods outperform ARIMA in this scenario?
An FRQ describes a dataset with a clear upward trend, strong December peaks, and random daily noise. Outline which model you'd select and justify your choice by explaining what each component of the model addresses.