upgrade
upgrade

🏹Native American History

Key Facts about Native American Boarding Schools

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Native American boarding schools represent one of the most significant—and devastating—federal policies aimed at Indigenous peoples in U.S. history. Understanding these institutions isn't just about memorizing school names and dates; you're being tested on broader concepts like forced assimilation, cultural genocide, federal Indian policy, and institutional resistance. These schools demonstrate how education became a tool of colonization, and their legacy connects directly to contemporary issues in Native American communities, from language revitalization efforts to ongoing debates about historical accountability.

When you encounter boarding schools on an exam, think about the mechanisms of assimilation at work: separating children from families, punishing Native language use, replacing cultural practices with Euro-American norms. But also recognize the resilience narrative—how some institutions evolved, how survivors maintained identity, and how communities are reclaiming this history today. Don't just memorize which school opened when—know what each institution reveals about federal policy, regional variation, and Indigenous survival.


Architects of Assimilation: The First Wave (1868–1884)

The earliest boarding schools established the template that would define Native education for decades. These institutions developed the assimilationist curriculum—vocational training, English-only policies, and systematic cultural suppression—that later schools would replicate across the country.

Carlisle Indian Industrial School

  • Founded 1879 in Pennsylvania as the first off-reservation boarding school—established the model that over 350 subsequent schools would follow
  • Richard Henry Pratt's motto "Kill the Indian, Save the Man" crystallized the assimilationist philosophy driving federal Indian education policy
  • Enrolled over 10,000 students from numerous tribes before closing in 1918, making it the most influential institution in shaping—and damaging—Native cultural identities

Hampton Institute

  • Originally founded in 1868 for freed African Americans—later expanded to include Native students, creating a unique cross-racial educational experiment
  • Pioneered the "industrial education" model emphasizing manual labor and self-sufficiency that became standard across Indian boarding schools
  • Produced Native leaders who later advocated for Indigenous rights—demonstrating how assimilationist institutions sometimes inadvertently fostered pan-Indian organizing

Compare: Carlisle vs. Hampton—both promoted vocational training and assimilation, but Hampton's mixed-race student body created different dynamics. Carlisle became the explicit model for federal Indian schools, while Hampton influenced policy more indirectly. If an FRQ asks about the origins of boarding school philosophy, Carlisle is your primary example.


Regional Expansion: Spreading the System (1880–1900)

As the boarding school model proved "successful" in federal eyes, new institutions opened across the country, each adapting the assimilationist template to regional contexts. These schools targeted specific tribal populations and reflected local economic priorities—agriculture in Oklahoma, industry in the Pacific Northwest.

Chemawa Indian School

  • Established 1880 in Oregon—one of the oldest continuously operating Indian boarding schools, providing over 140 years of institutional history to examine
  • Drew students from Pacific Northwest tribes including Yakama, Warm Springs, and Siletz nations, reflecting regional federal priorities
  • Notorious for harsh discipline and language suppression—its ongoing operation makes it a living example of how boarding school legacies persist

Chilocco Indian Agricultural School

  • Founded 1884 in Oklahoma with a specific focus on agricultural training—reflecting federal goals of transforming Native peoples into Euro-American-style farmers
  • Enrolled students from dozens of tribes forced into Indian Territory, creating unexpected opportunities for pan-Indian community building
  • Closed in 1980 after nearly a century, its agricultural focus representing the allotment era's vision of Native assimilation through land-based labor

Haskell Institute

  • Established 1884 in Kansas as a boarding school—now Haskell Indian Nations University, representing the most dramatic institutional transformation in this history
  • Transitioned to higher education in 1993, becoming a symbol of Indigenous reclamation of educational spaces
  • Serves students from federally recognized tribes nationwide—its evolution demonstrates how assimilationist institutions can be repurposed for cultural preservation

Compare: Chilocco vs. Haskell—both founded in 1884 with assimilationist goals, but their trajectories diverged dramatically. Chilocco closed; Haskell transformed. This contrast illustrates different possible outcomes for boarding school institutions and makes an excellent example for FRQs about institutional change over time.


The Southwest and California: Later Foundations (1890–1900)

Schools established in the 1890s operated within an already-entrenched system, but regional differences shaped their character. Southwestern schools served Pueblo, Navajo, and other nations with distinct cultural traditions, while California schools targeted the state's diverse Indigenous populations.

Santa Fe Indian School

  • Founded 1890 in New Mexico—uniquely emphasized arts and cultural education alongside assimilation, reflecting Pueblo artistic traditions
  • Transitioned to a day school model in the 1970s, allowing students to maintain family connections—a direct rejection of the separation philosophy
  • Known today for its strong arts program—represents how some institutions evolved to support rather than suppress Native identity

Phoenix Indian School

  • Established 1891 in Arizona to serve tribes across the Southwest—enrolled thousands of students from Navajo, Hopi, Pima, and other nations
  • Enforced strict discipline and cultural suppression typical of the era, with documented punishment for speaking Native languages
  • Closed in 1990; site now a cultural landmark—its transformation into a memorial space reflects contemporary efforts to reckon with boarding school history

Sherman Institute

  • Founded 1900 in California as one of the last major boarding schools established—served tribes from across the state and beyond
  • Now Sherman Indian High School, continuing to operate after transitioning in 1971—one of four remaining off-reservation boarding schools
  • History reflects California's unique Indigenous landscape—the state's tribal diversity meant Sherman served students from vastly different cultural backgrounds

Compare: Santa Fe vs. Phoenix—both Southwestern schools founded within a year of each other, but Santa Fe's arts emphasis and eventual day-school transition contrast sharply with Phoenix's stricter assimilationist approach and eventual closure. This pairing illustrates how institutional culture varied even within the same region and era.


Military Origins and Higher Education Transitions

Some boarding schools emerged from military institutions or eventually transformed into colleges, representing distinct trajectories within the broader system. These schools demonstrate how federal priorities shifted over time and how Indigenous communities sometimes reclaimed educational spaces.

Fort Lewis Indian School

  • Founded 1891 in Colorado as a military school—its origins reflect the close connection between military conquest and educational assimilation
  • Became Fort Lewis College in 1933, now a public liberal arts institution—Native American students attend tuition-free as part of the school's treaty obligations
  • Emphasizes Indigenous community engagement today—represents successful transformation from assimilationist to supportive institution

Flandreau Indian School

  • Established 1892 in South Dakota—served as a regional boarding school for Northern Plains tribes including Lakota and Dakota nations
  • Focused on vocational training consistent with the era's emphasis on manual labor as the path to "civilization"
  • Closed in 1970, its relatively early closure reflecting changing federal attitudes toward boarding school education during the self-determination era

Compare: Fort Lewis vs. Flandreau—both founded in the early 1890s, but Fort Lewis's military origins and transformation into a tuition-free college for Native students contrasts with Flandreau's closure. Fort Lewis demonstrates institutional evolution; Flandreau represents the more common pattern of boarding school termination.


ConceptBest Examples
Origins of assimilationist educationCarlisle, Hampton
Agricultural/vocational focusChilocco, Chemawa
Transformation to higher educationHaskell, Fort Lewis
Still operating todayChemawa, Sherman, Santa Fe
Southwestern regional schoolsPhoenix, Santa Fe, Sherman
Military connectionsFort Lewis, Carlisle (Pratt was Army captain)
Cultural preservation evolutionSanta Fe, Haskell
Closed institutionsCarlisle, Chilocco, Phoenix, Flandreau

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two schools were founded in 1884 and what different trajectories did they follow—one closing, one becoming a university?

  2. How did Santa Fe Indian School's approach to Native arts differ from the standard assimilationist model, and what does its transition to a day school reveal about changing attitudes toward Native education?

  3. Compare Carlisle and Hampton: What did they share in educational philosophy, and what made Hampton's origins and student body distinct?

  4. If an FRQ asked you to trace the evolution of federal Indian education policy from assimilation to self-determination, which three schools would best illustrate that arc and why?

  5. What do Chemawa and Sherman have in common that distinguishes them from most other schools on this list, and what does their continued operation suggest about the boarding school legacy?