Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding the scientists behind evolutionary theory isn't just about memorizing names and dates—you're being tested on how our understanding of evolution developed as a scientific framework. Each biologist on this list solved a specific puzzle: How does variation arise? How do new species form? What role does chance play versus selection? The exam expects you to connect these thinkers to the concepts they championed and understand how their ideas built upon or challenged one another.
The story of evolutionary biology is really the story of synthesis—bringing together natural selection, genetics, paleontology, and mathematics into one coherent theory. When you see a question about the Modern Synthesis or population genetics, you need to know which scientists contributed what pieces. Don't just memorize who did what—know what concept each biologist represents and how their work connects to testable mechanisms of evolution.
These scientists independently arrived at the same revolutionary insight: species change over time through differential survival and reproduction. Their observational work in the field established the foundation everything else builds upon.
Compare: Darwin vs. Wallace—both discovered natural selection independently, but Darwin emphasized gradual change through competition while Wallace focused more on environmental pressures and geographic factors. If an FRQ asks about the origins of evolutionary theory, mention both to show depth.
Evolution requires heritable variation, but Darwin couldn't explain where variation came from. These scientists provided the missing mechanism by discovering how traits pass from parents to offspring.
Compare: Mendel vs. Darwin—Darwin explained what happens in evolution (selection), while Mendel explained how it's possible (inheritance). Their synthesis in the 20th century created modern evolutionary biology. This connection is heavily tested.
The Modern Synthesis (1930s-1940s) unified Darwinian selection with Mendelian genetics. These scientists showed that evolution operates through changes in allele frequencies within populations, creating a mathematical and experimental foundation for the field.
Compare: Dobzhansky vs. Mayr—Dobzhansky focused on genetic variation within populations, while Mayr focused on how populations diverge into separate species. Together, they explained both microevolution and macroevolution. Know which is which for species-formation questions.
These scientists transformed evolution from a descriptive science into a predictive, quantitative one. They developed mathematical models showing how allele frequencies change over time through selection, drift, and other forces.
Compare: Fisher vs. Wright—Fisher emphasized large populations where selection dominates, while Wright emphasized small populations where genetic drift matters. This debate shaped how we understand the relative importance of deterministic versus random evolutionary forces. Exam questions often test whether you can identify when drift versus selection is more important.
Not all evolution proceeds at a steady pace. This scientist challenged the traditional view that evolution is always slow and gradual, proposing instead that change often comes in bursts.
Compare: Gould vs. Simpson—both studied evolutionary tempo using fossils, but Simpson saw the record as generally supporting gradualism while Gould emphasized discontinuity. This debate about evolutionary rates remains relevant for understanding macroevolution.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Natural Selection Theory | Darwin, Wallace |
| Mendelian Genetics | Mendel |
| Modern Synthesis | Dobzhansky, Mayr, Simpson |
| Population Genetics | Fisher, Haldane, Wright |
| Biological Species Concept | Mayr |
| Genetic Drift | Wright |
| Punctuated Equilibrium | Gould |
| Paleontology + Evolution | Simpson, Gould |
Which two scientists independently developed the theory of natural selection, and what prompted the joint publication of their ideas in 1858?
Compare and contrast Fisher's and Wright's views on evolutionary change—under what population conditions would each scientist's model be most applicable?
How did Dobzhansky's Drosophila research help resolve the apparent conflict between Mendelian genetics and Darwinian evolution?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how new species form, which biologist's concept should you reference, and what mechanism does it emphasize?
Gould's punctuated equilibrium challenged traditional gradualism. What evidence from the fossil record supported his alternative view, and how does this contrast with Simpson's interpretation of evolutionary tempo?