Key Events in Roman History

Why This Matters

Roman history isn't just a timeline to memorize—it's a case study in how civilizations rise, transform, and eventually fragment. You're being tested on your ability to recognize patterns: political transitions, military expansion, cultural shifts, and institutional collapse. Each event on this list demonstrates broader principles about governance, power, and societal change that appear repeatedly on exams.

Don't just memorize dates and names. Know what concept each event illustrates—whether that's the tension between republican ideals and individual ambition, the role of military conquest in economic growth, or the factors that destabilize empires. When you understand the why behind each event, you can tackle any FRQ prompt that asks you to analyze cause and effect or compare across time periods.

---

Political Transformations: From Kings to Republic to Empire

Rome's government evolved dramatically over a thousand years, and each transition reveals tensions between collective governance and concentrated power. These shifts weren't accidents—they resulted from specific crises that exposed weaknesses in existing systems.

Founding of Rome (753 BCE)

• Legendary origins established Rome's identity—the Romulus and Remus myth emphasized themes of divine favor, conflict, and destiny that Romans used to justify expansion
• Strategic location on seven hills near the Tiber River provided defensive advantages and access to trade routes connecting northern and southern Italy
• Marks the traditional starting point for Roman chronology, though archaeological evidence suggests earlier settlement in the region

Establishment of the Roman Republic (509 BCE)

• Overthrow of monarchy created shared governance—the Senate and popular assemblies replaced kings, distributing power among elite citizens
• Roman law and citizenship developed during this period, establishing legal principles (rule of law, due process) that influenced Western legal systems
• Annual elections of consuls prevented power concentration by limiting executive terms and requiring two leaders who could check each other

Assassination of Julius Caesar (44 BCE)

• Senators killed Caesar to preserve the Republic—his accumulation of titles and honors (dictator perpetuo) threatened the principle of shared power
• "Et tu, Brute?" captures the betrayal by trusted allies, though the phrase comes from Shakespeare rather than historical sources
• Triggered civil wars that ultimately destroyed what the assassins sought to save, demonstrating how political violence can accelerate institutional collapse

Establishment of the Roman Empire under Augustus (27 BCE)

• Augustus maintained republican facades while holding absolute power—he kept the Senate but controlled military, finances, and appointments
• Pax Romana began under his rule, a roughly 200-year period of relative peace and stability that enabled trade, urbanization, and cultural flourishing
• Imperial succession became Rome's central political problem, as Augustus never established a clear system for transferring power

---

Military Expansion and Its Consequences

Rome's growth from city-state to Mediterranean superpower depended on military success, but conquest created new challenges: managing distant territories, integrating conquered peoples, and distributing war profits. Each major conflict reshaped Roman society.

Punic Wars (264-146 BCE)

• Three wars against Carthage transformed Rome from Italian power to Mediterranean empire—control of Sicily, Spain, and North Africa followed
• Destruction of Carthage (146 BCE) eliminated Rome's greatest rival and demonstrated the Roman willingness to annihilate threats completely
• Economic consequences included massive slave influx, displacement of small farmers, and wealth concentration among elites—seeds of later instability

Peak of Roman Empire under Trajan (98-117 CE)

• Greatest territorial extent reached under Trajan, including Dacia (modern Romania) and temporary conquests in Mesopotamia
• Public works projects—roads, bridges, Trajan's Market, and Trajan's Column—demonstrated how emperors used construction to legitimize rule and employ citizens
• Social welfare programs (alimenta) provided food assistance to poor children, showing imperial concern for population stability

---

Urban Development and Disaster

Roman cities were centers of power, culture, and vulnerability. Major construction projects and catastrophic events reveal how Romans understood their relationship to the built environment and natural forces.

Great Fire of Rome (64 CE)

• Destroyed ten of fourteen districts—the fire burned for six days and left hundreds of thousands homeless
• Nero blamed Christians for the fire, initiating the first imperial persecution, though rumors also accused Nero himself of starting it
• Urban renewal followed, including wider streets, building height limits, and fire-resistant materials—disaster drove regulatory innovation

Construction of the Colosseum (70-80 CE)

• Flavian Amphitheatre held 50,000-80,000 spectators and hosted gladiatorial combat, animal hunts, and public executions
• Engineering innovations included a complex system of underground tunnels (hypogeum), retractable awnings, and efficient crowd management through numbered entrances
• Political function mattered as much as entertainment—emperors used spectacles to demonstrate generosity and maintain popular support (bread and circuses)

Eruption of Mount Vesuvius (79 CE)

• Buried Pompeii and Herculaneum under volcanic ash, killing thousands but preserving an unprecedented snapshot of Roman daily life
• Archaeological evidence from these sites informs most of what we know about ordinary Roman houses, shops, food, and social practices
• Pliny the Younger's account provides the first detailed description of a volcanic eruption, giving the phenomenon its scientific name (Plinian eruption)

---

Religious and Cultural Transformation

Rome's religious landscape shifted dramatically, from traditional polytheism to Christian dominance. These changes reflected and accelerated broader transformations in Roman identity and imperial governance.

Edict of Milan (313 CE)

• Constantine legalized Christianity, ending persecution and allowing open worship, church construction, and Christian participation in public life
• Political calculation likely motivated the decision—Constantine sought Christian support in civil wars and recognized the faith's organizational strength
• Laid groundwork for Theodosius's decree (380 CE) making Christianity the official state religion, completing a transformation that took less than a century

---

Imperial Decline and Collapse

The Western Empire's fall wasn't a single event but a process spanning centuries. Understanding the combination of factors—military pressure, economic strain, political instability, and institutional decay—matters more than memorizing the final date.

Fall of Rome to the Visigoths (410 CE)

• First sack of Rome in 800 years—Alaric's Visigoths breached the walls and plundered the city for three days, shocking the Mediterranean world
• Symbolized imperial vulnerability rather than causing collapse—the Western Empire continued for another 66 years
• Barbarian integration had proceeded for generations; many "invaders" were former Roman soldiers or allies seeking better terms, not foreign conquerors

Fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 CE)

• Romulus Augustulus deposed by Odoacer, a Germanic general who ruled Italy without claiming the imperial title
• Traditional end date for antiquity and beginning of the medieval period, though contemporaries may not have recognized it as a decisive break
• Multiple causes converged: military overextension, tax base erosion, plague, climate change, political fragmentation, and loss of territorial revenue

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two events both involved attempts to prevent power concentration in one person's hands, and why did they have opposite outcomes?

2. Compare the Punic Wars and Trajan's conquests: what do they share as examples of military expansion, and how did their effects on Roman political stability differ?

3. If an FRQ asked you to explain how disasters shaped Roman urban policy, which two events would you choose and what specific changes resulted from each?

4. The Edict of Milan (313 CE) and the fall of Rome (476 CE) both mark major transitions. What broader pattern of change does each represent, and how are they connected?

5. Which events on this list best illustrate the concept of unintended consequences—where actions produced results opposite to what participants expected? Explain your reasoning.