Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
In AP Physics C: Mechanics, you're not just memorizing formulas—you're building a toolkit for analyzing motion in any scenario the exam throws at you. These equations connect position, velocity, and acceleration through both algebraic relationships and calculus-based definitions. The College Board expects you to recognize when each equation applies, derive relationships using calculus, and translate between graphical, mathematical, and physical representations of motion.
The key insight is that these equations fall into distinct categories: algebraic kinematics equations that assume constant acceleration, calculus-based definitions that work for any motion, and specialized equations for specific contexts like circular motion. Don't just memorize the formulas—know which conditions must be true for each equation to apply, and understand how derivatives and integrals connect position, velocity, and acceleration. This conceptual framework will carry you through FRQs that require justification and multi-step problem solving.
These foundational relationships define velocity and acceleration through derivatives. They work for any type of motion—constant acceleration, variable acceleration, or otherwise—making them the most general and powerful tools in your kinematics toolkit.
Compare: vs. —both are derivative relationships, but acceleration is one order higher. On FRQs, if given , differentiate once for velocity, twice for acceleration; if given , integrate to find velocity and position.
These definitions describe motion over finite time intervals rather than at instants. They're essential for experimental data analysis and for problems where you only know initial and final states.
Compare: Average velocity vs. instantaneous velocity—average describes an entire interval while instantaneous describes a single moment. If an FRQ gives you position data at discrete times, you can only calculate average quantities directly.
These algebraic equations only apply when acceleration is constant. They're derived by integrating the calculus definitions under the assumption that doesn't change, producing the classic "Big Four" kinematic equations.
Compare: vs. —both require constant acceleration, but choose the first when you know time and the second when time is unknown. The time-independent equation is often faster for "find final speed" problems.
When objects move in two or three dimensions, position, velocity, and acceleration become vectors. The same kinematic relationships apply component-by-component, allowing you to treat each dimension independently.
Compare: Scalar vs. vector kinematics—the equations have the same form, but vectors require you to track direction. In 2D projectile problems, horizontal and vertical motions are solved separately, then combined.
When objects move in circular paths, linear and angular quantities are related through the radius. This bridges translational kinematics with rotational motion concepts.
Compare: vs. translational —the first relates linear to angular motion at an instant, while the second describes how velocity changes over time. Circular motion problems often require both types of analysis.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Calculus definitions (any motion) | , |
| Average quantities | , |
| Constant acceleration (with time) | , |
| Constant acceleration (time-independent) | |
| Vector/2D motion | |
| Circular motion | |
| Graphical interpretation (slope) | from - graph, from - graph |
| Graphical interpretation (area) | from - graph, from - graph |
Which two equations would you use together to solve for final velocity when you know initial velocity, acceleration, and displacement—but not time?
Under what conditions do the constant-acceleration kinematic equations fail to apply? What approach would you use instead?
Compare and contrast and . When does the average velocity equal the instantaneous velocity?
If an FRQ gives you acceleration as a function of time, , explain step-by-step how you would find position as a function of time.
How does the equation connect to the work-energy theorem? What physical insight does this relationship provide?