Key Environmental Analytical Methods

Why This Matters

Environmental analytical methods are the backbone of everything you'll do in Environmental Chemistry II—they're how we actually detect, identify, and quantify the pollutants and compounds you've been learning about all semester. When regulators set drinking water standards or scientists track pesticide contamination in soil, they're relying on these exact techniques. You're being tested not just on what each method does, but on why you'd choose one method over another for a specific analytical problem.

The key to mastering this material is understanding the underlying principles: separation vs. detection, molecular vs. elemental analysis, and destructive vs. non-destructive techniques. Each method exploits different physical or chemical properties—volatility, charge, mass, light absorption—to reveal information about environmental samples. Don't just memorize acronyms; know what property each technique targets and when it's the right tool for the job.

---

Separation-Based Techniques

These methods physically separate complex mixtures into individual components before detection. The separation principle depends on how analytes interact with stationary and mobile phases based on their chemical properties.

Gas Chromatography (GC)

• Separates volatile organic compounds by partitioning them between a gas mobile phase and a stationary phase inside a heated column
• Retention time identifies compounds—each analyte exits the column at a characteristic time based on its volatility and interaction with the stationary phase
• Paired with detectors like FID or TCD for quantification; essential for analyzing VOCs, pesticides, and petroleum hydrocarbons in air and water samples

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

• Handles non-volatile and thermally unstable compounds that would decompose in GC's heated environment
• Liquid mobile phase carries analytes through a packed column; separation occurs based on polarity, size, or charge depending on column type
• Versatile detection options (UV, fluorescence, electrochemical) make it ideal for pharmaceuticals, hormones, and polar pesticides in environmental matrices

Ion Chromatography (IC)

• Separates ionic species (anions like nitrate, sulfate; cations like ammonium, sodium) based on charge interactions with an ion-exchange resin
• Conductivity detection provides sensitive quantification of dissolved ions in water samples
• Critical for water quality monitoring—used to measure nutrient pollution, acid rain components, and drinking water contaminants

---

Mass-Based Detection

Mass spectrometry identifies compounds by their molecular weight and fragmentation patterns. Ionization converts molecules into charged particles that can be sorted by their mass-to-charge ratio ($m/z$).

Mass Spectrometry (MS)

• Measures $m/z$ ratios to identify compounds based on molecular mass and characteristic fragmentation patterns
• Provides structural information about unknowns—fragmentation patterns act like molecular fingerprints for identification
• Rarely used alone—typically coupled with GC or HPLC (GC-MS, LC-MS) to combine separation power with definitive identification

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

• Uses argon plasma at ~10,000 K to atomize and ionize samples for multi-element analysis at trace levels
• Exceptional sensitivity (parts per trillion) and ability to analyze 70+ elements simultaneously in a single run
• Gold standard for trace metals in environmental samples—drinking water, contaminated soils, biological tissues

---

Elemental Analysis Techniques

These methods quantify specific elements (especially metals) in environmental samples. They exploit how atoms absorb or emit electromagnetic radiation at characteristic wavelengths.

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)

• Measures light absorption by ground-state atoms at element-specific wavelengths using a hollow cathode lamp
• Highly selective—each element requires its own lamp, making it ideal for targeted single-element analysis
• Workhorse for trace metals like lead, cadmium, and mercury in water quality testing and soil contamination studies

X-ray Fluorescence (XRF)

• Non-destructive technique that bombards samples with X-rays, causing elements to emit characteristic fluorescent X-rays
• Analyzes solids directly without digestion—suitable for soils, sediments, waste materials, and even field screening
• Rapid multi-element screening but less sensitive than AAS or ICP for trace-level detection

---

Spectroscopic Identification Methods

These techniques identify compounds based on how molecules interact with electromagnetic radiation. Different wavelengths probe different molecular properties—electronic transitions, vibrations, or nuclear spin states.

UV-Visible Spectroscopy

• Measures absorption of UV/visible light (200–800 nm) caused by electronic transitions in molecules with chromophores
• Beer-Lambert Law ($A = \varepsilon bc$) relates absorbance to concentration for quantitative analysis
• Quick and inexpensive for colored compounds, aromatic pollutants, and routine water quality parameters like nitrate

Infrared Spectroscopy (IR)

• Identifies functional groups by measuring molecular vibrations—each bond type absorbs at characteristic frequencies
• Fingerprint region (below 1500 $\text{cm}^{-1}$) provides unique patterns for compound identification
• Qualitative powerhouse for characterizing organic pollutants, plastics, and unknown environmental contaminants

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

• Exploits nuclear spin states in magnetic fields to reveal detailed molecular structure and connectivity
• $^1H$ and $^{13}C$ NMR provide complementary information about hydrogen and carbon environments in organic molecules
• Best for structural elucidation of complex unknowns and mixture analysis, though less sensitive than other techniques

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. A water sample may contain both dissolved heavy metals and polar organic pesticides. Which two techniques would you use to fully characterize this sample, and why can't one method do both?

2. You need to identify an unknown organic contaminant in soil. Rank GC-MS, IR, and NMR in terms of the type of structural information each provides—what does each technique tell you that the others don't?

3. Compare and contrast AAS and ICP-MS for trace metal analysis. Under what circumstances would you choose the simpler, single-element AAS over the more powerful ICP-MS?

4. A field team needs rapid, on-site screening of soil for heavy metal contamination. Which technique is most appropriate and why? What are its limitations compared to laboratory methods?

5. An FRQ asks you to design an analytical protocol for detecting pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater. Explain why HPLC-MS would be preferred over GC-MS for this application, referencing the chemical properties of typical pharmaceuticals.