Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Feature writing separates competent journalists from compelling storytellers. While news articles deliver facts in inverted pyramid style, features use narrative techniques to create emotional resonance and lasting impact. You're being tested on your ability to understand structure as strategy—how each element of a feature article serves a specific purpose in guiding readers through a story and making them care about the subject matter.
The elements you'll learn here aren't arbitrary conventions; they're tools that professional writers deploy intentionally to hook attention, build credibility, and create meaning. When you analyze a feature article on an exam or craft one yourself, don't just identify these components—understand why they appear where they do and how they work together to create a unified reading experience. Master the function, and the form follows.
The first three elements of a feature article work as a team to accomplish a critical task: convincing a busy reader to invest their time in your story. Each plays a distinct role in that process.
Compare: Lead vs. Nut Graph—both appear early and both are essential, but they serve opposite functions. The lead creates intrigue and emotion; the nut graph provides clarity and context. A strong lead without a nut graph leaves readers confused; a nut graph without a lead bores them before they get there.
Features distinguish themselves from opinion pieces through rigorous sourcing and concrete detail. These elements transform assertions into believable, textured storytelling.
Compare: Quotes vs. Anecdotes—both humanize a story, but quotes provide authority and voice while anecdotes provide narrative and emotion. Use quotes when you need credibility; use anecdotes when you need readers to feel something. The strongest features weave both together.
Even the most compelling content fails if readers can't follow it. These elements create the invisible architecture that makes a feature feel effortless to read.
Compare: Transitions vs. Subheadings—both help readers navigate, but they work at different scales. Transitions connect individual ideas and paragraphs; subheadings organize major sections. Think of transitions as bridges and subheadings as chapter titles. A well-structured feature uses both strategically.
The ending of a feature carries disproportionate weight because it's what readers remember. A weak conclusion undermines everything that came before it.
Compare: Lead vs. Conclusion—the best features create a conversation between these two elements. The lead raises questions or introduces tensions; the conclusion resolves or reframes them. When revising, read your lead and conclusion back-to-back to test whether they feel like they belong to the same story.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Hooking the reader | Headline, Lead/Hook |
| Establishing significance | Nut Graph, Background Information |
| Building credibility | Quotes and Attribution, Background Information |
| Creating emotional connection | Anecdotes, Lead/Hook |
| Developing the narrative | Body Paragraphs, Anecdotes |
| Guiding reader navigation | Transitions, Subheadings |
| Providing closure | Conclusion |
| Working as structural pairs | Lead + Conclusion, Nut Graph + Body Paragraphs |
Which two elements both appear early in a feature article but serve opposite functions—one creating intrigue, the other providing clarity?
If you wanted to help readers feel the human impact of a policy change rather than just understand it intellectually, which element would be most effective, and why?
Compare and contrast the navigational functions of transitions and subheadings. In what situations might a writer rely more heavily on one than the other?
A feature article has a compelling lead and strong body paragraphs, but the conclusion simply restates the main points. What technique could strengthen the ending, and how does it relate to the opening?
You're writing a feature about a controversial scientific study. Which elements would you prioritize to establish credibility, and how would you balance them with elements that create emotional engagement?