Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Thermodynamic potentials are the bridge between the microscopic chaos of particle motion and the macroscopic properties you can actually measure in a lab. You're being tested on your ability to choose the right potential for the right constraintsโwhether a system is held at constant temperature, pressure, volume, or particle number completely changes which potential minimizes at equilibrium. Master this, and you'll understand why reactions proceed, when phases transform, and how energy flows through any system.
These potentials aren't just abstract mathโthey're Legendre transforms of each other, trading one natural variable for its conjugate. This means you need to know which variables are held fixed, which potential applies, and how the partition function connects to each one. Don't just memorize definitions; know what physical situation each potential describes and why minimizing it tells you about spontaneity and equilibrium.
When you control temperature and volume, the Helmholtz free energy becomes your workhorse. The system exchanges heat with a reservoir but cannot expand or contract.
Compare: Internal Energy (U) vs. Helmholtz Free Energy (F)โboth describe closed systems, but U applies to isolated systems (fixed S, V) while F applies when you're in thermal contact with a reservoir (fixed T, V). If an FRQ asks about isothermal processes in a rigid container, reach for F.
Most real experimentsโchemistry in open beakers, biological systems, atmospheric processesโoccur at constant pressure. Here, the system can exchange both heat and do expansion work against the atmosphere.
Compare: Helmholtz (F) vs. Gibbs (G)โboth measure "free" energy available for work, but F applies at constant volume while G applies at constant pressure. Most chemical reactions use G because labs operate at atmospheric pressure, not in rigid sealed containers.
When particles can enter or leave your system, you need potentials that account for chemical potential . The grand canonical ensemble describes systems exchanging both energy and particles with a reservoir.
Compare: Helmholtz (F) vs. Grand Potential (ฮฉ)โboth apply at constant T and V, but F fixes particle number N while ฮฉ fixes chemical potential ฮผ. Use ฮฉ when modeling systems like gases exchanging molecules with a reservoir or electrons in a metal at fixed Fermi level.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Fixed S, V (isolated) | Internal Energy (U) |
| Fixed T, V (isothermal, rigid) | Helmholtz Free Energy (F) |
| Fixed S, P (adiabatic, constant pressure) | Enthalpy (H) |
| Fixed T, P (lab conditions) | Gibbs Free Energy (G) |
| Fixed T, V, ฮผ (open systems) | Grand Potential (ฮฉ) |
| Partition function connection | , |
| Grand partition function connection | |
| Spontaneity criterion | Appropriate potential decreases toward equilibrium |
Which two potentials both apply to systems at constant temperature, and what distinguishes when you'd use each one?
You're analyzing a chemical reaction in an open beaker at room temperature. Which thermodynamic potential determines spontaneity, and why would using Helmholtz free energy give you the wrong answer?
Compare and contrast the Helmholtz free energy and the grand potential: what natural variables does each use, and how does this connect to whether particle number is fixed?
If you're given a partition function , write the expressions for both internal energy and Helmholtz free energy . Why is often more useful in statistical mechanics calculations?
An FRQ describes a gas in thermal equilibrium with a heat bath, confined to a rigid container, but able to exchange particles through a semipermeable membrane. Which potential should you minimize to find equilibrium, and what variables are held constant?