Key Concepts of Substitution Reactions

Why This Matters

Substitution and elimination reactions are the workhorses of organic synthesis—and they're absolutely central to how you'll be tested in organic chemistry. These four mechanisms (SN1, SN2, E1, E2) don't exist in isolation; they compete with each other, and your job is to predict which pathway wins based on substrate structure, nucleophile/base strength, and solvent choice. Mastering these reactions means understanding reaction kinetics, stereochemical outcomes, carbocation stability, and steric effects all at once.

Here's the key insight: exam questions rarely ask you to simply identify a mechanism. Instead, you're being tested on your ability to predict products, explain stereochemistry, and justify why one pathway dominates over another. Don't just memorize that "SN2 gives inversion"—understand why backside attack is required and how that connects to the concerted mechanism. Each reaction type illustrates fundamental principles about how electrons move and how molecular structure dictates reactivity.

---

Bimolecular Mechanisms: Concerted, One-Step Processes

These reactions happen in a single step where bond-breaking and bond-forming occur simultaneously. The rate depends on the concentration of both reactants, giving second-order kinetics: $\text{rate} = k[\text{substrate}][\text{nucleophile or base}]$.

SN2 (Bimolecular Nucleophilic Substitution)

• Concerted backside attack—the nucleophile attacks 180° opposite the leaving group, resulting in a single transition state with no intermediate
• Inversion of configuration (Walden inversion) occurs at the chiral center because the nucleophile must approach from the back side
• Primary substrates favored due to minimal steric hindrance; tertiary substrates essentially don't undergo SN2 because the nucleophile can't access the electrophilic carbon

E2 (Bimolecular Elimination)

• Anti-periplanar geometry required—the proton and leaving group must be 180° apart for orbital overlap in the transition state
• Strong bases drive E2 over substitution, especially bulky bases like tert-butoxide that can't easily act as nucleophiles
• Zaitsev's rule typically applies, favoring the more substituted (more stable) alkene product, though bulky bases can give Hofmann products

---

Unimolecular Mechanisms: Stepwise Processes via Carbocations

These reactions proceed through a carbocation intermediate formed in the rate-determining step. Only the substrate concentration affects the rate, giving first-order kinetics: $\text{rate} = k[\text{substrate}]$.

SN1 (Unimolecular Nucleophilic Substitution)

• Two-step mechanism—slow ionization forms a planar carbocation, then fast nucleophilic attack from either face
• Racemization results because the $sp^2$-hybridized carbocation can be attacked from both sides, producing roughly equal amounts of both enantiomers
• Tertiary substrates favored because they form the most stable carbocations; primary substrates almost never undergo SN1

E1 (Unimolecular Elimination)

• Shares the carbocation intermediate with SN1—the rate-determining step is identical, making these pathways direct competitors
• Deprotonation follows ionization—a base removes a proton from a carbon adjacent to the carbocation, forming the alkene
• Carbocation rearrangements possible via hydride or methyl shifts, often leading to unexpected products that reveal the carbocation pathway

---

Controlling Factors: What Determines the Pathway?

The outcome of these competing reactions depends on four key variables working together. Understanding these factors is more important than memorizing individual reactions because they allow you to predict outcomes for substrates you've never seen.

Substrate Structure Effects

• Tertiary substrates favor SN1/E1 because they form stable carbocations and are too sterically hindered for bimolecular attack
• Primary substrates favor SN2 due to easy nucleophilic access; they rarely form carbocations because primary carbocations are highly unstable
• Secondary substrates are the battleground where all four mechanisms compete—reaction conditions determine the winner

Nucleophile and Base Strength

• Strong nucleophiles push SN2—charged species like $\text{CN}^-$, $\text{I}^-$, and $\text{RS}^-$ are excellent for bimolecular substitution
• Strong bases push E2—especially bulky bases like $\text{(CH}_3\text{)}_3\text{CO}^-$ that are poor nucleophiles due to steric hindrance
• Weak nucleophiles/bases allow SN1/E1—solvent molecules (water, alcohols) participate after carbocation formation

Leaving Group Quality

• Better leaving groups accelerate all pathways—the ability to stabilize negative charge determines leaving group quality
• Halide trend: $\text{I}^- > \text{Br}^- > \text{Cl}^- >> \text{F}^-$—larger, more polarizable anions are better leaving groups
• Tosylates and mesylates are excellent leaving groups often used synthetically because they're easily installed and highly reactive

---

Solvent Effects: The Often-Overlooked Variable

Solvent choice can completely flip which mechanism dominates. The key distinction is whether the solvent can hydrogen-bond to nucleophiles (protic) or not (aprotic).

Polar Protic Solvents

• Stabilize ions through hydrogen bonding—this favors SN1/E1 by stabilizing both the carbocation and the leaving group anion
• Solvate nucleophiles and reduce their reactivity—hydrogen bonding "cages" the nucleophile, slowing bimolecular attack
• Examples include water, alcohols, and carboxylic acids—these solvents are commonly used for solvolysis reactions

Polar Aprotic Solvents

• Cannot hydrogen-bond to nucleophiles—this leaves nucleophiles "naked" and highly reactive, favoring SN2/E2
• Still dissolve ionic compounds through dipole interactions with cations while leaving anions free
• Examples include DMSO, DMF, and acetone—choosing these solvents dramatically accelerates bimolecular reactions

---

Stereochemical Outcomes: Predicting Configuration

Stereochemistry questions are exam favorites because they test whether you truly understand the mechanism. The geometry of the transition state or intermediate directly determines the product stereochemistry.

Stereochemistry in Bimolecular Reactions

• SN2 gives complete inversion—if you start with the R enantiomer, you get the S product (assuming priorities don't change)
• E2 requires anti-periplanar arrangement—this geometric constraint determines which diastereomer of the alkene forms
• Concerted mechanisms give predictable, single stereochemical outcomes—no mixtures result from the mechanism itself

Stereochemistry in Unimolecular Reactions

• SN1 gives racemization—the planar carbocation has equal probability of attack from either face, yielding ~50:50 enantiomer mixtures
• E1 can give multiple alkene isomers—both E and Z products may form, typically favoring the more stable E isomer
• Carbocation rearrangements complicate predictions—always check for possible hydride or methyl shifts before drawing products

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. A secondary alkyl bromide is treated with sodium cyanide in DMSO. Which mechanism dominates, and why does solvent choice matter here?

2. Compare the stereochemical outcomes of SN1 and SN2 reactions starting from a single enantiomer. How would you distinguish between these mechanisms experimentally?

3. Why do SN1 and E1 reactions always compete with each other, and what conditions would you change to favor elimination over substitution?

4. A tertiary alkyl chloride is heated in ethanol. Predict the products and explain why both substitution and elimination occur.

5. Rank the following in order of increasing SN2 reaction rate: methyl bromide, isopropyl bromide, ethyl bromide, tert-butyl bromide. Explain your reasoning based on the mechanism.