upgrade
upgrade

🏔️Intro to Geotechnical Science

Key Concepts of Retaining Wall Designs

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Retaining walls are everywhere—highway cuts, basement excavations, waterfront developments, hillside construction—and understanding why different designs exist is fundamental to geotechnical engineering. You're being tested on your ability to match wall types to site conditions, understand the mechanics of how each system resists lateral earth pressure, and recognize the trade-offs between cost, height capacity, and construction complexity. These concepts connect directly to broader course themes: soil mechanics, lateral earth pressure theory, foundation design, and slope stability.

Don't just memorize wall names and heights. Know what resistance mechanism each wall uses—is it relying on mass, structural bending, soil reinforcement, or external anchoring? When you can identify the underlying principle, you can answer any question about appropriate wall selection, failure modes, or design modifications. The exam will test your conceptual understanding, not your ability to recite dimensions.


Mass-Based Resistance: Letting Weight Do the Work

These walls resist lateral earth pressure primarily through their own weight. The principle is simple: if the wall is heavy enough, the overturning and sliding forces from the retained soil can't move it.

Gravity Walls

  • Self-weight provides all resistance—the wall's mass counteracts lateral earth pressure without structural reinforcement
  • Materials include concrete, stone, or masonry—chosen for density and durability in low to moderate height applications (up to 20 feet)
  • Foundation stability is critical—without adequate bearing capacity beneath the wall, the entire system fails regardless of wall mass

Gabion Walls

  • Wire mesh baskets filled with rock—creates a flexible, free-draining mass that resists lateral loads while allowing water to pass through
  • Environmentally adaptable design—vegetation can grow through the structure, making it ideal for erosion control and naturalized settings
  • Best for low-height applications—the loose fill limits structural capacity, but installation is straightforward and cost-effective

Crib Walls

  • Interlocking timber or concrete units—form a grid structure filled with soil or gravel, combining mass resistance with internal friction
  • Flexible geometry—adapts to irregular site conditions and provides good drainage through the open structure
  • Moderate height capacity—suitable where aesthetics and drainage matter more than maximum height

Compare: Gravity walls vs. Gabion walls—both rely on mass for stability, but gabions offer superior drainage and environmental integration while gravity walls provide greater structural rigidity. If an FRQ asks about waterfront erosion control, gabions are your go-to example.


Structural Bending: Engineering Efficiency for Height

When walls need to go taller, pure mass becomes impractical. These designs use structural elements that resist lateral pressure through bending moment capacity, transferring loads to the foundation more efficiently.

Cantilever Walls

  • Vertical stem plus base slab—the L-shaped or inverted-T configuration uses the weight of backfill soil on the heel to resist overturning
  • Efficient for heights up to 30 feet—bending resistance allows thinner sections than equivalent gravity walls
  • Soil analysis is essential—the design depends on accurate lateral earth pressure calculations and foundation bearing capacity

Counterfort Retaining Walls

  • Vertical supports (counterforts) on the backfill side—connect the stem to the base slab at intervals, reducing bending stress in the stem
  • Ideal for taller cantilever applications—counterforts allow thinner wall sections while handling heights up to 30 feet
  • Load distribution is key—proper spacing ensures each counterfort carries its share of lateral pressure

Buttressed Retaining Walls

  • Buttresses on the exposed face—provide the same structural benefit as counterforts but are visible from the front
  • Material-efficient for high walls—reduces concrete volume compared to solid gravity designs
  • Spacing and sizing require careful design—buttress intervals must balance structural efficiency with construction practicality

Compare: Cantilever vs. Counterfort walls—both use bending resistance, but counterforts add vertical stiffeners for taller applications. Think of counterforts as "cantilever walls with backup" when heights exceed 20-25 feet.


Soil Reinforcement: Making the Earth Work for You

These systems don't just retain soil—they incorporate soil as a structural element. By adding reinforcement within the soil mass, engineers create a composite system with dramatically increased stability.

Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls

  • Geogrids or geotextiles reinforce compacted fill—the reinforcement transfers tensile stresses, allowing the soil mass to act as a coherent gravity structure
  • Height capacity up to 50 feet—far exceeds conventional gravity walls because the reinforced zone extends well behind the facing
  • Drainage and compaction are critical—poor drainage or inadequate compaction compromises the entire reinforced mass

Soil Nailed Walls

  • Steel bars (nails) inserted into existing soil—creates in-situ reinforcement without requiring excavation and backfill
  • Excellent for steep slopes and excavation support—nails are installed as excavation proceeds, providing immediate stabilization
  • Monitoring during construction is essential—soil behavior can change as nails are installed and loads redistribute

Compare: MSE walls vs. Soil nailed walls—both reinforce soil, but MSE uses select backfill placed in layers while soil nailing reinforces existing ground. MSE is better for new construction; soil nailing excels in cut situations where you can't excavate behind the wall.


External Anchoring: Adding Tension for Extreme Conditions

When internal resistance isn't enough, these systems add external tensioned elements that pull the wall into the retained soil mass, dramatically increasing stability.

Anchored Walls

  • Tensioned anchors extend into stable soil or rock—provide active resistance against lateral forces by pre-stressing the wall system
  • Effective for high walls and urban settings—minimizes the wall footprint when space is limited
  • Detailed anchor design is critical—anchor length, spacing, and grouting must ensure adequate pullout resistance

Sheet Pile Walls

  • Interlocking steel, vinyl, or wood sheets driven into ground—the embedded portion provides passive resistance while the exposed portion retains soil or water
  • Ideal for waterfront and space-constrained sites—thin profile and ability to resist hydrostatic pressure make them essential for marine applications
  • Can be temporary or permanent—steel sheets can be extracted and reused, or left in place with corrosion protection

Compare: Anchored walls vs. Sheet pile walls—both work in tight spaces, but anchored walls use tension elements while sheet piles rely on embedment. Sheet piles are your answer for waterfront questions; anchored walls dominate deep urban excavations.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Mass-based resistanceGravity walls, Gabion walls, Crib walls
Structural bendingCantilever walls, Counterfort walls, Buttressed walls
Soil reinforcementMSE walls, Soil nailed walls
External anchoringAnchored walls, Sheet pile walls
Maximum height capacityMSE walls (50 ft), Cantilever/Counterfort (30 ft), Gravity (20 ft)
Waterfront applicationsSheet pile walls, Gabion walls
Urban/space-constrainedAnchored walls, Sheet pile walls
Drainage-critical sitesGabion walls, Crib walls, MSE walls

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two wall types both rely on soil reinforcement but differ in whether they use existing ground or placed backfill? Explain when you'd choose each.

  2. A project requires a 40-foot retaining wall in an area with limited right-of-way. Which wall types could work, and what resistance mechanism does each use?

  3. Compare and contrast counterfort and buttressed retaining walls. Why might an engineer choose one over the other despite their similar structural function?

  4. If an FRQ describes a waterfront site with soft soils and tidal fluctuations, which wall type best addresses both lateral earth pressure and hydrostatic pressure? Justify your answer using the wall's resistance mechanism.

  5. Arrange these walls from lowest to highest typical height capacity: cantilever, gravity, MSE, gabion. For each, identify the factor that limits its maximum height.