Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The resource curse represents one of the most counterintuitive puzzles in international political economy: why do countries blessed with oil, minerals, and natural gas so often end up poorer, more corrupt, and less stable than their resource-poor neighbors? Understanding this phenomenon means grasping how wealth itself can become a trap—and that's exactly the kind of analytical thinking you're being tested on. The resource curse connects to core IPE themes including state capacity, economic development strategies, North-South relations, and the politics of globalization.
When you encounter resource curse questions on the exam, you're being tested on your ability to explain causal mechanisms—how does resource wealth lead to weak institutions? Why does oil money fuel conflict? Don't just memorize that "resources = bad outcomes." Know which specific pathway each concept illustrates, whether that's economic distortion, governance failure, or social instability. That's what separates a 3 from a 5.
These concepts explain how resource wealth warps a country's economic structure, creating dependencies and vulnerabilities that undermine long-term growth. The core mechanism: easy money from extraction crowds out harder but healthier economic activities.
Compare: Dutch Disease vs. Diversification Challenges—both describe how resource wealth crowds out other sectors, but Dutch Disease emphasizes the currency mechanism while diversification challenges focus on investment patterns and policy choices. If an FRQ asks about economic structure, use both.
Resource wealth doesn't just distort economies—it corrupts political systems. The core mechanism: when governments can fund themselves through extraction rather than taxation, they become less accountable to citizens.
Compare: Rent-seeking vs. Corruption—rent-seeking describes the behavior of pursuing wealth through political manipulation, while corruption describes the outcome when that behavior captures state institutions. Both undermine development, but corruption implies systematic institutional capture.
When resource wealth concentrates power and exacerbates inequality, the result is often violence. The core mechanism: high-value resources create something worth fighting over, while weak institutions can't manage the resulting conflicts.
Compare: Conflict vs. Human Capital Underinvestment—both are consequences of the resource curse, but conflict represents acute political failure while underinvestment represents chronic developmental failure. Strong FRQ answers connect both to weak institutions as the common cause.
Resource extraction doesn't just affect economies and politics—it transforms landscapes and communities. The core mechanism: short-term profit incentives override long-term sustainability, especially when governance is weak.
Compare: Environmental Degradation vs. Dutch Disease—both represent "crowding out" dynamics, but Dutch Disease crowds out other economic sectors while environmental degradation crowds out other land uses and future possibilities. Both illustrate how resource extraction can impoverish even as it generates revenue.
Understanding the resource curse starts with recognizing the paradox itself—that abundance can become a trap.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Economic Distortion | Dutch Disease, Volatility, Diversification Challenges |
| Governance Failure | Weak Institutions, Rent-Seeking, Corruption |
| Political Instability | Conflict, Patronage Networks |
| Development Traps | Human Capital Underinvestment, Environmental Degradation |
| Currency Effects | Dutch Disease |
| Accountability Problems | Weak Institutions, Corruption |
| Violence Drivers | Conflict, Rent-Seeking |
| Long-term Damage | Environmental Degradation, Human Capital Underinvestment |
Mechanism identification: What specific economic process explains why discovering natural gas in the Netherlands damaged its manufacturing sector? What would you call this phenomenon?
Compare and contrast: Both rent-seeking behavior and corruption involve pursuing wealth through political means. What distinguishes them, and how do they reinforce each other in resource-rich states?
Causal chain: Explain the pathway from resource wealth → weak institutions → conflict. What role does the "taxation-accountability" relationship play?
Policy application: If a newly resource-rich country asked you how to avoid the resource curse, which three concepts would you prioritize addressing first, and why?
FRQ practice: "Resource wealth undermines democracy." Using at least three concepts from this guide, construct an argument supporting this claim and identify one counterexample or limitation.