Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Pourbaix diagrams are where thermodynamics meets real-world materials engineering—they're the roadmaps electrochemists use to predict whether a metal will corrode, stay protected, or remain completely stable in a given environment. When you're tested on electrochemistry, you're being asked to demonstrate mastery of equilibrium concepts, redox reactions, pH dependence, and phase stability all at once. Pourbaix diagrams integrate every one of these principles into a single visual tool.
Understanding these diagrams isn't just about reading a graph—it's about recognizing why certain metals fail in acidic conditions, how protective oxide layers form, and what thermodynamic boundaries actually mean for material selection. Don't just memorize that iron corrodes at low pH; know which region of the diagram you're in and what electrochemical principle explains that behavior. That's what separates a surface-level answer from one that earns full credit.
Before diving into specific regions, you need to understand what Pourbaix diagrams actually plot. These diagrams map thermodynamic stability as a function of two variables that control aqueous electrochemistry: acidity and electron availability.
Compare: The upper vs. lower water stability lines—both have the same slope because both involve one electron per proton, but they differ by 1.23 V (the thermodynamic voltage for water electrolysis). If an FRQ asks about the "electrochemical window" of water, these lines define it.
The power of Pourbaix diagrams lies in identifying distinct regions where different species dominate. Each region represents conditions where one particular phase—metal, ion, or oxide—has the lowest Gibbs free energy.
Compare: Immunity vs. passivation—both protect the metal, but immunity means no reaction occurs (thermodynamic stability of the metal itself), while passivation means a reaction did occur but produced a protective solid layer. FRQs often ask you to distinguish these mechanisms.
Understanding how Pourbaix diagrams are constructed helps you interpret them correctly and recognize their assumptions. The diagrams derive entirely from thermodynamic data—they tell you what should happen at equilibrium, not how fast it happens.
Compare: Horizontal vs. diagonal boundaries—horizontal lines represent pure electron-transfer reactions (like ), while diagonal lines represent reactions involving both electrons and protons (like ). Recognizing the slope tells you the reaction stoichiometry.
Pourbaix diagrams are workhorses in corrosion engineering, but knowing their boundaries is just as important as knowing how to use them. Real systems often deviate from equilibrium predictions due to kinetic barriers.
Compare: Thermodynamic vs. kinetic stability—aluminum is thermodynamically unstable in most aqueous environments (corrosion zone), yet it resists corrosion excellently because its oxide layer forms rapidly and adheres well. Pourbaix diagrams show the driving force; kinetics determines the outcome.
Specific Pourbaix diagrams for important metals illustrate how general principles apply to real materials. Each metal's unique electrochemistry creates characteristic patterns of stability.
Compare: Iron vs. aluminum passivation—both form protective oxides, but aluminum's is dense, adherent, and self-healing, while iron oxides are porous and allow continued corrosion underneath. This explains why aluminum performs better than its Pourbaix diagram might suggest.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| pH dependence of stability | Diagonal boundaries, amphoteric aluminum behavior |
| Potential dependence of stability | Horizontal redox boundaries, immunity zone location |
| Water stability limits | Upper line, lower line, 1.23 V separation |
| Corrosion prediction | Iron at low pH, aluminum in strong acid or base |
| Passivation mechanisms | formation, at neutral pH |
| Cathodic protection | Shifting potential into immunity zone |
| Kinetic vs. thermodynamic stability | Aluminum's practical performance vs. diagram prediction |
| Diagram construction | Nernst equation, solubility products, standard potentials |
A metal's Pourbaix diagram shows a large passivation region between pH 4-10. If you need to use this metal in pH 2 acid, what two protection strategies could shift the system into a stable region?
Compare the immunity zones of iron and aluminum. Why is cathodic protection practical for iron pipelines but not for aluminum structures?
You observe that a boundary line on a Pourbaix diagram is perfectly horizontal. What does this tell you about the reaction occurring at that boundary? Write a general form of such a reaction.
Aluminum corrodes in both strong acid and strong base, yet resists corrosion at neutral pH. What single term describes this behavior, and which species is stable in the middle pH range?
An engineer argues that since copper sits in the "corrosion zone" of its Pourbaix diagram at pH 7 and normal atmospheric potential, copper roofs should dissolve rapidly. Explain why this prediction fails and what limitation of Pourbaix diagrams this illustrates.