Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Just-in-Time (JIT) isn't just an inventory strategy—it's a fundamental shift in how organizations think about production, waste, and value creation. When you're tested on global supply operations, you're being evaluated on your understanding of demand-driven systems, waste elimination, supplier integration, and operational flexibility. JIT connects directly to broader concepts like lean manufacturing, supply chain resilience, and competitive advantage through operational excellence.
The concepts in this guide represent the building blocks of modern manufacturing philosophy. Don't just memorize definitions—understand why each component exists and how they work together as a system. Know what problem each element solves, and you'll be ready for any question that asks you to analyze, compare, or apply JIT principles to real scenarios.
JIT represents a paradigm shift from traditional "just-in-case" inventory thinking. The core mechanism is simple: produce and deliver only what's needed, when it's needed, in the exact quantity needed.
Compare: Pull production vs. Push production—both aim to meet customer demand, but pull responds to actual orders while push anticipates them. If a case study asks about inventory buildup or demand mismatch, push production is likely the culprit.
JIT requires specific tools and techniques to translate philosophy into practice. These mechanisms create the information flow and visual management systems that make demand-driven production possible.
Compare: Kanban vs. traditional MRP scheduling—both manage production flow, but kanban is decentralized and visual while MRP is centralized and computer-driven. For FRQs about shop floor control or production responsiveness, kanban demonstrates JIT principles in action.
JIT extends beyond factory walls—it requires fundamentally different relationships with suppliers and integration with broader operational philosophies. Success depends on trust, reliability, and shared commitment to continuous improvement.
Compare: JIT vs. Lean manufacturing—JIT focuses specifically on timing and inventory flow, while lean is the broader philosophy encompassing all waste elimination. When analyzing a company's operational strategy, lean is the umbrella; JIT is a key tool underneath it.
JIT isn't a one-time implementation—it's a commitment to perpetual refinement. The philosophy assumes that current processes are never optimal and that everyone in the organization can contribute to improvement.
Compare: Kaizen vs. breakthrough improvement (kaikaku)—both drive progress, but kaizen emphasizes small daily improvements while kaikaku involves radical redesign. Most JIT environments rely on kaizen, but kaikaku may be needed when processes are fundamentally broken.
JIT's strengths can become vulnerabilities. Understanding when JIT works—and when it doesn't—separates strategic thinking from textbook recitation.
Compare: Toyota vs. Dell JIT implementations—both eliminate finished goods inventory, but Toyota manufactures components while Dell assembles purchased parts. This distinction matters when analyzing which JIT elements transfer across industries.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Pull-based production | Kanban signals, customer order triggers, supermarket replenishment |
| Waste elimination | Inventory reduction, lead time compression, defect prevention |
| Supplier integration | Toyota supplier parks, Dell's vendor-managed inventory |
| Visual management | Kanban cards, andon lights, production boards |
| Continuous improvement | Kaizen events, PDCA cycles, employee suggestion systems |
| Lean connection | TPS, value stream mapping, seven wastes framework |
| Implementation risks | Supply disruption, demand variability, coordination complexity |
How do kanban systems and pull production work together to prevent overproduction, and why is this relationship central to JIT philosophy?
Compare Toyota's JIT implementation with Dell's build-to-order model—what principles do they share, and how do their supply chain structures differ?
If a company experiences frequent stockouts after implementing JIT, which system components (supplier relationships, demand forecasting, or kanban quantities) would you examine first, and why?
Explain why kaizen is considered essential to JIT rather than optional—what happens to a JIT system without continuous improvement?
A manufacturing company with highly seasonal demand and long supplier lead times is considering JIT implementation. What challenges would they face, and what modifications might make JIT principles applicable to their situation?