Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Gravity anomalies are your window into Earth's hidden architecture. When you measure gravity at the surface, you're detecting density variations that extend kilometers below your feet—from shallow ore bodies to the base of mountain roots. Understanding these anomalies connects directly to isostasy, plate tectonics, and crustal structure, all core concepts you'll encounter repeatedly on exams. Every gravity survey, whether for oil exploration or studying subduction zones, relies on the corrections and interpretations covered here.
You're being tested on more than definitions—examiners want to see that you understand why different corrections exist and when each anomaly type reveals something meaningful about Earth's interior. Don't just memorize that Bouguer anomalies correct for topography; know why that correction matters for isolating subsurface density contrasts. Master the logic behind these concepts, and you'll handle any FRQ that asks you to interpret gravity data.
Before interpreting gravity data, geophysicists must strip away predictable effects to reveal the anomalies that matter. Each correction removes a specific "noise" source, and the order of corrections determines what geological signal remains. The goal is always the same: separate what you expect from what's geologically interesting.
Compare: Free-air vs. Bouguer anomalies—both start with observed gravity, but free-air only corrects for height while Bouguer also removes topographic mass. If an FRQ shows positive free-air but negative Bouguer over mountains, that's classic isostatic compensation.
Isostasy describes how Earth's lithosphere floats on the denser asthenosphere below. Gravity anomalies reveal whether regions are in isostatic equilibrium or actively adjusting—key for understanding post-glacial rebound, mountain building, and basin subsidence.
Compare: Mass deficiency vs. mass excess—opposite signs, opposite causes. A basin filled with sediments (deficiency) might sit adjacent to an igneous intrusion (excess). FRQs often ask you to interpret adjacent positive and negative anomalies as geological boundaries.
Gravity data contains overlapping signals from features at different depths and scales. Separating these signals is essential for targeting specific geological questions—deep crustal structure versus shallow ore bodies require different analytical approaches.
Compare: Regional vs. residual anomalies—same data, different filters. Regional anomalies answer "what's the deep crustal structure?" while residuals answer "what's the local geology?" Know which to use for different exploration targets.
To identify anomalies, you need a reference for what gravity should be. The choice of reference surface determines what your anomaly actually measures—this is where geodesy meets geophysics.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Elevation corrections | Free-air anomaly, Bouguer anomaly |
| Topographic effects | Terrain effect, Bouguer correction |
| Isostatic indicators | Isostatic anomaly, mass deficiency, mass excess |
| Scale separation | Regional anomaly, residual anomaly |
| Boundary detection | Gravity gradient |
| Reference surfaces | Geoid undulation |
| Exploration targets | Mass excess (ore), mass deficiency (basins) |
| Tectonic applications | Free-air anomaly, isostatic anomaly |
Why does a mountain range typically show a positive free-air anomaly but a negative Bouguer anomaly? What does this combination reveal about isostatic compensation?
You're exploring for a dense sulfide ore body in a sedimentary basin. Would you focus on regional or residual gravity anomalies, and why?
Compare and contrast mass deficiency and mass excess: what geological features produce each, and how would their gravity signatures differ on a profile?
A gravity survey shows near-zero isostatic anomalies across an ancient mountain belt but significant positive isostatic anomalies over a recently deglaciated region. Explain what each observation indicates about crustal equilibrium.
How does the gravity gradient provide different information than the gravity anomaly magnitude, and why is this distinction important for mapping geological boundaries?