Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Evolution isn't just one process—it's a toolkit of mechanisms that shape genetic variation and drive change across populations over time. On the AP Biology exam, you're being tested on your ability to distinguish how each mechanism operates, what conditions favor one over another, and why certain outcomes (like reduced diversity or rapid adaptation) occur. The exam loves to present scenarios where you must identify which mechanism is at work, so understanding the underlying principles—not just definitions—is critical.
These concepts connect directly to Unit 7's big ideas about heredity and evolution, but they also tie back to earlier units on genetics and even cell biology. You'll see these mechanisms appear in multiple-choice questions asking you to predict outcomes, and in FRQs that require you to explain why a population changed. Don't just memorize the terms—know what each mechanism does to allele frequencies, whether it's random or selective, and how mechanisms can work together or against each other.
For evolution to occur, populations need raw material—genetic differences that selection and other forces can act upon. These mechanisms introduce new alleles or combinations into populations.
Compare: Gene flow vs. horizontal gene transfer—both introduce new alleles, but gene flow occurs through reproduction between populations of the same species, while horizontal gene transfer bypasses reproduction entirely and can cross species boundaries. FRQs about bacterial evolution often test this distinction.
Not all evolutionary change is adaptive. These mechanisms alter allele frequencies through chance events, independent of whether alleles are beneficial or harmful. They're especially powerful in small populations.
Compare: Bottleneck vs. founder effect—both reduce genetic diversity through small population size, but bottlenecks shrink an existing population while founder effects create a new population from migrants. If an FRQ describes colonization of an island, think founder effect; if it describes a population crash, think bottleneck.
These mechanisms increase the frequency of alleles that confer advantages—whether for survival, reproduction, or simply transmission to the next generation. Unlike drift, selection is non-random.
Compare: Natural selection vs. sexual selection—both are non-random and increase fitness-related alleles, but natural selection acts on survival traits while sexual selection acts on mating success. A trait that reduces survival but increases mating (like bright coloration) indicates sexual selection is the dominant force.
These mechanisms cause alleles to spread through populations in ways that don't follow simple Mendelian expectations. They reveal that inheritance itself can be subject to evolutionary forces.
Compare: Genetic hitchhiking vs. meiotic drive—both cause alleles to spread in unexpected ways, but hitchhiking depends on linkage to a beneficial allele (selection-driven), while meiotic drive depends on biased gamete formation (transmission-driven). Hitchhiking requires natural selection; meiotic drive can occur without any fitness advantage.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Introduces new alleles | Mutation, gene flow, horizontal gene transfer |
| Random change in allele frequency | Genetic drift, bottleneck, founder effect |
| Non-random change in allele frequency | Natural selection, sexual selection |
| Most powerful in small populations | Genetic drift, bottleneck, founder effect |
| Reduces genetic variation | Genetic drift, bottleneck, selective sweep (hitchhiking) |
| Increases genetic variation | Mutation, gene flow, horizontal gene transfer |
| Violates expected inheritance | Meiotic drive, genetic hitchhiking |
| Causes population divergence | Genetic drift (in isolation), natural selection |
| Homogenizes populations | Gene flow |
A population of mice on an island experiences a hurricane that kills 90% of individuals. The surviving mice happen to all have brown fur, though the original population was 50% brown and 50% white. Which mechanism explains the change in allele frequency, and why isn't this natural selection?
Compare and contrast how gene flow and genetic drift affect genetic variation within and between populations. Under what conditions might they have opposing effects?
A researcher notices that a neutral SNP has increased dramatically in frequency in a population at the same time as a nearby gene for pesticide resistance spread. Which mechanism best explains this, and what would you predict about genetic variation in the chromosomal region surrounding the resistance gene?
Which two mechanisms could cause a harmful allele to increase in frequency in a population? Explain the conditions under which each would operate.
An FRQ describes two isolated populations of the same species: one large and one small. Both experience the same selection pressure favoring a new beneficial mutation. Predict which population will show faster adaptive change and explain how the interaction between selection and drift affects your answer.