Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding energy systems is the foundation of everything you'll do in strength and conditioning—from designing periodized programs to explaining why an athlete feels gassed after repeated sprints. You're being tested on your ability to match the right training stimulus to the right energy pathway, predict fatigue patterns, and justify rest intervals. These concepts connect directly to exercise prescription, work-to-rest ratios, sport-specific training, and recovery protocols.
The three energy systems don't work in isolation; they're constantly overlapping and transitioning based on intensity and duration. Don't just memorize that the ATP-PC system lasts "up to 10 seconds"—understand why it's the go-to system for explosive power and what happens physiologically when it depletes. Know which system dominates for a given activity, how to train each one specifically, and how recovery timelines differ. That's what separates a surface-level answer from an exam-ready response.
The phosphagen system is your body's first responder—it delivers energy instantly but burns out fast. It relies on stored ATP and phosphocreatine already present in muscle cells, requiring no oxygen and producing no fatiguing byproducts.
When immediate ATP stores run low and oxygen delivery can't keep up, glycolysis takes over. This system breaks down glucose anaerobically, producing ATP faster than oxidative metabolism but generating lactate as a byproduct.
Compare: ATP-PC vs. Glycolytic System—both are anaerobic and fuel high-intensity work, but ATP-PC is faster and produces no lactate, while glycolysis sustains effort longer at the cost of metabolic byproduct accumulation. If asked about fatigue mechanisms, glycolysis is your answer; if asked about maximal power output, it's ATP-PC.
For anything lasting more than a couple of minutes, aerobic metabolism becomes the primary driver. This system uses oxygen to break down carbohydrates and fats in the mitochondria, producing large amounts of ATP at a sustainable but slower rate.
Compare: Glycolytic vs. Oxidative System—both can use carbohydrates, but glycolysis works without oxygen and fatigues quickly, while oxidative metabolism requires oxygen and sustains effort indefinitely at lower intensities. Endurance athletes need oxidative dominance; power athletes still benefit from aerobic capacity for recovery.
Energy production isn't a light switch—it's a dimmer. All three systems contribute simultaneously, with their relative dominance shifting based on exercise demands. Understanding this interplay is essential for programming appropriate work-to-rest ratios and predicting performance limitations.
Compare: A 100m sprint vs. a 1500m race—the sprinter operates almost entirely in the ATP-PC and early glycolytic zones, while the middle-distance runner relies heavily on glycolysis with increasing oxidative support. Both require anaerobic capacity, but programming differs dramatically.
Knowing how long each system takes to recover—and how to train each one specifically—is where theory becomes practice. Recovery timelines and training adaptations are among the most directly applicable concepts for program design.
Compare: Training for a shot putter vs. a soccer midfielder—the shot putter needs maximal ATP-PC development (short explosive reps, full recovery), while the midfielder requires glycolytic tolerance and aerobic endurance (repeated sprints with incomplete rest, plus base conditioning). Same athlete, completely different energy system priorities.
Matching training to the metabolic demands of a sport is the practical application of everything above. Energy system specificity ensures athletes develop the physiological capacities their competition actually requires.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| ATP-PC dominance | Olympic lifts, vertical jump, 40-yard dash, shot put |
| Glycolytic dominance | 400m sprint, wrestling, HIIT intervals, repeated sprints |
| Oxidative dominance | Marathon, cycling, swimming, steady-state cardio |
| Energy system overlap | 800m run, soccer match, basketball game |
| Recovery timeline (fast) | ATP-PC replenishment (3-5 minutes) |
| Recovery timeline (slow) | Glycolytic/lactate clearance (up to 30 minutes) |
| Training for power | Short sprints, full rest, explosive lifts |
| Training for endurance | Tempo runs, long slow distance, aerobic intervals |
Which two energy systems are both anaerobic, and what distinguishes their primary use cases in training?
An athlete performs six 10-second sprints with only 30 seconds rest between each. Which energy system is being undertrained due to insufficient recovery, and how would you modify the protocol?
Compare and contrast the fuel sources and byproducts of the glycolytic and oxidative systems. Why does this matter for fatigue management?
A soccer player needs to repeat high-intensity sprints throughout a 90-minute match. Which energy systems must be developed, and what training methods would you prescribe for each?
If an exam question asks you to justify rest intervals for a maximal strength program, which energy system's recovery timeline should you reference, and what specific timeframe would you cite?