Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Disruptive business models aren't just case studies to memorize—they're the strategic frameworks that explain how Exponential Organizations achieve 10x growth while traditional competitors struggle to keep pace. When you're tested on ExO principles, you need to understand how these models leverage technology, networks, and assets they don't own to scale rapidly. Each model represents a different answer to the same question: how do you grow exponentially without linear increases in resources?
The models in this guide demonstrate core ExO attributes like Leveraged Assets, Staff on Demand, Algorithms, and Engagement. Rather than memorizing company names, focus on what mechanism each model uses to achieve scalability—whether that's network effects, asset utilization, recurring revenue, or data leverage. Don't just know what Uber does; know why its model creates exponential rather than linear growth.
These models grow more valuable as more users join—the product improves through usage itself. Network effects create powerful moats and enable winner-take-most dynamics.
Compare: Platform vs. Crowdsourcing—both leverage external networks, but platforms facilitate transactions between users while crowdsourcing aggregates contributions toward a single output. If asked about ExO's "Crowd" attribute, crowdsourcing is your clearest example; for "Interfaces" managing external resources, go with platforms.
These models maximize value extraction from existing resources—using what already exists rather than building from scratch. They embody the ExO principle that ownership is a liability, not an asset.
Compare: Sharing Economy vs. D2C—both bypass traditional intermediaries, but sharing economy unlocks existing distributed assets while D2C maintains ownership but eliminates distribution middlemen. Sharing economy is more aligned with pure ExO asset leverage; D2C prioritizes brand control and customer data ownership.
These models transform one-time transactions into ongoing relationships—predictable revenue enables aggressive growth investment. They shift the business focus from acquisition to retention.
Compare: Subscription vs. Freemium—both generate recurring revenue, but subscription charges from day one while freemium delays monetization to maximize adoption. Freemium works when network effects matter and marginal costs are near zero; pure subscription works when the value proposition is immediately clear.
These models use emerging technologies to create entirely new value propositions—the technology itself is the disruption. They often eliminate trusted intermediaries by replacing them with code.
Compare: Blockchain vs. Data-Driven—both leverage digital infrastructure, but they represent opposite philosophies. Data-driven models centralize information for competitive advantage; blockchain distributes it for transparency and trust. Both are disruptive, but to different incumbents and for different reasons.
These models respond to shifting consumer values—either environmental consciousness or demand for immediacy. They represent how disruption can be driven by changing preferences, not just technology.
Compare: Circular Economy vs. On-Demand—these models optimize for opposite consumer values. Circular economy prioritizes long-term sustainability over convenience; on-demand prioritizes immediate gratification over efficiency. Both are disruptive, but they attract different customer segments and require different operational capabilities.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Network Effects | Platform Model, Crowdsourcing Model |
| Leveraged/Shared Assets | Sharing Economy, Platform Model |
| Recurring Revenue | Subscription-Based, Freemium |
| Intermediary Elimination | D2C, Blockchain-Based, Platform |
| Data as Core Asset | Data-Driven, Platform Model |
| Technology-First Disruption | Blockchain-Based, On-Demand |
| Sustainability Focus | Circular Economy, Sharing Economy |
| Staff on Demand / Gig Economy | On-Demand, Crowdsourcing |
Which two models both leverage network effects but differ in what the network produces? Explain how value creation differs between them.
A company wants to disrupt an industry dominated by powerful retailers. Compare the strategic tradeoffs between adopting a Platform Model versus a Direct-to-Consumer Model.
Identify which disruptive model best exemplifies each ExO attribute: Leveraged Assets, Algorithms, Staff on Demand, and Community & Crowd. Justify each choice.
Compare and contrast the Freemium and Subscription models: under what market conditions would each be the superior choice for a new ExO?
If an FRQ asks you to evaluate a traditional manufacturing company's options for exponential transformation, which three models would you recommend they consider, and what would each require them to change about their current operations?