Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Credit rating agencies sit at the intersection of risk assessment, market efficiency, and information asymmetryโthree concepts you'll see tested repeatedly in financial institutions and markets. When you understand how these agencies operate, you're really learning about how markets price risk, why borrowing costs vary between issuers, and how third-party intermediaries reduce uncertainty in complex financial systems. These agencies don't just assign letter grades; they shape capital allocation, regulatory requirements, and investor behavior across global markets.
Don't just memorize which agency uses which rating scaleโknow what role credit ratings play in reducing adverse selection, how they influence cost of capital, and why their methodologies matter for market stability. You're being tested on the economic function these institutions serve, not just their founding dates. If you can explain why a downgrade raises borrowing costs or how rating agency conflicts of interest contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, you're thinking at the level the exam demands.
The credit rating industry is highly concentrated, with three agencies controlling approximately 95% of the global market. This oligopolistic structure creates both efficiency through standardization and concerns about systemic risk and conflicts of interest.
Compare: Moody's vs. S&Pโboth dominate global credit ratings, but Moody's uses a lowercase modifier system (Aa1, Aa2) while S&P uses plus/minus (AA+, AA-). On exams asking about rating agency methodology, note that despite different notation, their assessments typically correlate highly, raising questions about whether multiple agencies add independent value.
Newer and regional agencies challenge the Big Three's dominance by offering alternative perspectives and methodologies. This competition addresses concerns about rating shopping, conflicts of interest, and geographic concentration in the industry.
Compare: Big Three vs. newer agencies (DBRS, KBRA)โestablished agencies offer market acceptance and regulatory integration, while newer entrants promise methodological innovation and reduced conflicts of interest. If an FRQ asks about market structure in credit ratings, discuss how barriers to entry (regulatory recognition, reputation) maintain oligopoly despite post-crisis criticism.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Market dominance/oligopoly | Moody's, S&P, Fitch (Big Three control ~95% market share) |
| Rating scale notation | Moody's (Aaa, Aa1), S&P/Fitch (AAA, AA+) |
| Regulatory integration | S&P, Moody's (embedded in Basel capital requirements) |
| Post-crisis alternatives | KBRA (founded 2010), DBRS Morningstar |
| Geographic diversification | DBRS (Canadian origin), Fitch (European presence) |
| Information asymmetry reduction | All agenciesโcore economic function |
| Issuer-pays conflict of interest | Big Three (primary business model concern) |
Which two agencies use nearly identical rating notation (AAA, AA+, etc.), and how does Moody's notation differ?
If an issuer receives different ratings from Moody's and S&P, what role might Fitch play, and what does this suggest about the value of multiple rating agencies?
Compare the Big Three's market position with newer agencies like KBRAโwhat barriers to entry explain why the oligopoly persists despite criticism?
How do credit rating agencies reduce information asymmetry in debt markets, and what conflict of interest arises from the issuer-pays model?
An FRQ asks you to explain how credit ratings affect cost of capital. Using any two agencies as examples, describe the mechanism by which a rating change influences an issuer's borrowing costs.