Key Concepts of Cosmological Models

Why This Matters

Cosmological models aren't just abstract theories—they're the frameworks astrophysicists use to answer the biggest questions: How did the universe begin? What's it made of? How will it end? When you're tested on this material, you're being asked to demonstrate that you understand how scientists connect observational evidence (like the cosmic microwave background or galaxy redshifts) to mathematical descriptions of spacetime. These models tie directly to concepts you'll see throughout the course: general relativity, dark matter and dark energy, large-scale structure formation, and the geometry of spacetime itself.

The key to mastering this topic is recognizing that each model makes specific predictions and addresses specific problems. Don't just memorize names and dates—know what evidence supports or contradicts each model, what physical principles underlie it, and how models relate to one another. When an exam question asks you to compare the Big Bang and Steady State models, you need to explain why one succeeded and the other didn't. That's the level of thinking that earns full credit.

---

Foundational Expansion Models

These models establish the basic framework for understanding how the universe evolves over time. They solve Einstein's field equations under assumptions of homogeneity and isotropy—meaning the universe looks the same everywhere and in every direction on large scales.

Big Bang Model

• Origin point approximately 13.8 billion years ago—the universe began as an extremely hot, dense state (often called a singularity) and has been expanding ever since
• Cosmic microwave background (CMB) provides direct observational evidence, representing the thermal radiation left over from when the universe cooled enough for atoms to form
• Galactic redshift confirms ongoing expansion; distant galaxies show light stretched to longer wavelengths, consistent with space itself expanding

Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) Model

• Mathematical backbone of modern cosmology—a solution to Einstein's field equations of general relativity assuming a homogeneous, isotropic universe
• Allows for three curvature geometries: open ($k = -1$), closed ($k = +1$), or flat ($k = 0$), each with different implications for the universe's fate
• Scale factor $a(t)$ describes how distances between objects change over time, forming the basis for calculating cosmic expansion rates

Einstein-de Sitter Model

• Simplified matter-dominated universe—assumes no cosmological constant ($\Lambda = 0$) and flat geometry
• Predicts eternal but decelerating expansion; gravity from matter gradually slows the expansion rate without ever halting it
• Historical teaching model that helps students understand dynamics before adding dark energy complications—useful for building intuition about how density affects expansion

---

Geometry and Fate of the Universe

The universe's ultimate fate depends on its geometry, which is determined by the ratio of actual density to critical density. This ratio, called $\Omega$, determines whether space curves back on itself, extends infinitely, or lies perfectly balanced between the two.

Flat Universe Model

• Zero spatial curvature ($k = 0$)—parallel lines remain parallel forever, and the geometry matches what you learned in high school
• Density equals critical density ($\Omega = 1$); current observations strongly support a flat or nearly flat universe on large scales
• Expansion continues forever but the rate asymptotically approaches zero in a matter-only scenario; with dark energy, expansion actually accelerates

Open Universe Model

• Negative curvature ($k = -1$)—like the surface of a saddle, where parallel lines eventually diverge
• Density below critical density ($\Omega < 1$); insufficient matter to halt or reverse expansion
• Infinite and unbounded; the universe expands forever, with expansion rate decreasing but never reaching zero

Closed Universe Model

• Positive curvature ($k = +1$)—like the surface of a sphere, where parallel lines eventually converge
• Density exceeds critical density ($\Omega > 1$); gravitational attraction strong enough to eventually reverse expansion
• Predicts a Big Crunch—the universe would stop expanding, contract, and collapse back to a singularity (largely ruled out by current observations showing accelerating expansion)

---

Addressing Big Bang Limitations

The standard Big Bang model leaves certain observations unexplained. These extensions and modifications tackle specific puzzles like why the CMB is so uniform across regions that couldn't have been in causal contact, or why the universe appears so geometrically flat.

Inflationary Model

• Exponential expansion in the first $10^{-36}$ to $10^{-32}$ seconds—the universe grew by a factor of at least $10^{26}$ almost instantaneously
• Solves the horizon problem; regions of the CMB that appear causally disconnected were actually in contact before inflation stretched space apart
• Explains flatness and generates primordial fluctuations—quantum fluctuations stretched to cosmic scales became the seeds for galaxies and large-scale structure

Lambda-CDM Model

• Current standard model of cosmology—incorporates dark energy ($\Lambda$, the cosmological constant) and cold dark matter (CDM) into the FLRW framework
• Explains accelerating expansion discovered in 1998 through Type Ia supernova observations; dark energy comprises roughly 68% of the universe's energy density
• Successfully predicts CMB anisotropies, galaxy clustering, and baryon acoustic oscillations—the most observationally validated cosmological model we have

---

Alternative and Historical Models

Not every cosmological model survived contact with observational evidence. Understanding why certain models failed helps you appreciate what makes a successful scientific theory—it must make testable predictions that hold up under scrutiny.

Steady State Model

• Proposed an eternal, unchanging universe—matter continuously created to maintain constant density as space expands (violates conservation of energy in its original form)
• No singular beginning; directly contradicted the Big Bang by rejecting the idea of cosmic evolution
• Disproven by CMB discovery and observed cosmic evolution—the universe clearly looked different in the past, with more quasars and different galaxy populations at high redshift

Cyclic Model

• Universe undergoes infinite expansion-contraction cycles—each cycle begins with a Big Bang-like event and may end with a Big Crunch or transition event
• Avoids the singularity problem by suggesting our Big Bang was just the latest in an infinite series, not a true beginning
• Remains speculative but offers an alternative to inflation; some versions invoke colliding branes from string theory to trigger each cycle

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. What observational evidence led to the rejection of the Steady State Model in favor of the Big Bang Model? Name at least two pieces of evidence.

2. Compare the Inflationary Model and Lambda-CDM Model: what time period does each primarily describe, and what key problem does each solve?

3. If the universe has $\Omega > 1$, which geometry model applies, and what does this predict about the universe's ultimate fate?

4. The FLRW Model and the Big Bang Model are often discussed together. Explain the relationship between them—how does one depend on the other?

5. An FRQ asks you to explain why the cosmic microwave background appears so uniform across the sky despite regions being causally disconnected. Which model provides the explanation, and what is the mechanism?