upgrade
upgrade

🧂Physical Chemistry II

Key Concepts of Chemical Kinetics Rate Laws

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Chemical kinetics is where thermodynamics meets reality—just because a reaction can happen doesn't mean it will happen fast enough to matter. In Physical Chemistry II, you're being tested on your ability to connect mathematical rate expressions to molecular-level events. This means understanding not just what the rate laws are, but why different reaction orders produce different concentration-time relationships and how experimental data reveals mechanistic information.

The concepts here—reaction order, integrated rate laws, half-life relationships, and the steady-state approximation—form the quantitative backbone of kinetic analysis. When you encounter an exam problem, you need to recognize which mathematical framework applies and why. Don't just memorize equations—know what physical situation each rate law describes and how to extract mechanistic insight from kinetic data.


Fundamental Rate Laws by Reaction Order

The reaction order tells you how concentration changes affect the rate. Each order produces a characteristic mathematical signature that you can identify through graphical analysis or half-life behavior.

Zero-Order Rate Law

  • Rate is independent of reactant concentration—the reaction proceeds at a constant rate Rate=k\text{Rate} = k until the reactant is depleted
  • Linear concentration decay follows [A]=[A]0kt[A] = [A]_0 - kt, meaning a plot of [A][A] vs. tt gives a straight line with slope k-k
  • Surface saturation or catalyst limitation typically causes zero-order behavior—the rate-limiting factor isn't how much reactant you have

First-Order Rate Law

  • Rate is directly proportional to concentration—expressed as Rate=k[A]\text{Rate} = k[A], doubling concentration doubles the rate
  • Exponential decay follows ln[A]=ln[A]0kt\ln[A] = \ln[A]_0 - kt, so a plot of ln[A]\ln[A] vs. tt yields a straight line
  • Constant half-life of t1/2=0.693kt_{1/2} = \frac{0.693}{k} is the signature feature—independent of how much reactant you start with

Second-Order Rate Law

  • Rate depends on concentration squared—either Rate=k[A]2\text{Rate} = k[A]^2 for one reactant or Rate=k[A][B]\text{Rate} = k[A][B] for two
  • Reciprocal concentration follows 1[A]=1[A]0+kt\frac{1}{[A]} = \frac{1}{[A]_0} + kt, giving a linear plot of 1[A]\frac{1}{[A]} vs. tt
  • Half-life increases as reaction proceedst1/2=1k[A]0t_{1/2} = \frac{1}{k[A]_0} means each successive half-life is longer than the last

Compare: First-order vs. second-order half-lives—both depend on kk, but first-order t1/2t_{1/2} is concentration-independent while second-order t1/2t_{1/2} increases as [A]0[A]_0 decreases. If an FRQ gives you successive half-life data, this distinction immediately identifies the reaction order.


Simplifying Complex Kinetics

Real reactions rarely involve a single elementary step. These tools let you reduce complex mechanisms to tractable mathematics.

Pseudo-First-Order Rate Law

  • Large excess of one reactant makes its concentration effectively constant, simplifying Rate=k[A][B]\text{Rate} = k[A][B] to Rate=k[B]\text{Rate} = k'[B] where k=k[A]k' = k[A]
  • Isolates the kinetics of the limiting reactant—essential for studying enzyme-substrate interactions and hydrolysis reactions
  • Experimentally powerful because you can determine the true rate constant by varying the excess reactant concentration

Steady-State Approximation

  • Intermediate concentration stays constant—the rate of formation equals the rate of consumption, so d[I]dt0\frac{d[I]}{dt} \approx 0
  • Eliminates intermediate terms from the rate law, allowing you to express the overall rate in terms of reactants only
  • Valid when intermediates are reactive—they're consumed almost as fast as they're formed, keeping their concentration low and stable

Compare: Pseudo-first-order vs. steady-state—both simplify complex kinetics, but pseudo-first-order uses experimental conditions (excess reactant) while steady-state uses mathematical assumptions about intermediate behavior. Know when each approach is appropriate.


Connecting Rate Laws to Mechanisms

The observed rate law constrains what mechanisms are possible. These concepts bridge experimental kinetics and molecular-level understanding.

Integrated Rate Laws

  • Transform differential equations into usable forms—connecting concentration directly to time for zero, first, and second-order reactions
  • Enable graphical determination of order—plot [A][A], ln[A]\ln[A], or 1[A]\frac{1}{[A]} vs. time and see which gives a straight line
  • Yield rate constants from slopes—the linear plot's slope directly gives kk (or k-k), allowing quantitative kinetic analysis

Half-Life Equations

  • Diagnostic for reaction order—zero-order: t1/2=[A]02kt_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k}; first-order: t1/2=0.693kt_{1/2} = \frac{0.693}{k}; second-order: t1/2=1k[A]0t_{1/2} = \frac{1}{k[A]_0}
  • Concentration dependence is the key—if t1/2t_{1/2} changes with initial concentration, you're not dealing with first-order kinetics
  • Practical applications include radioactive decay (first-order) and drug metabolism modeling

Compare: Zero-order vs. second-order half-life dependence—both depend on [A]0[A]_0, but zero-order t1/2t_{1/2} increases with higher initial concentration while second-order t1/2t_{1/2} decreases. This counterintuitive result is a common exam trap.


Mechanistic Analysis

Understanding how reactions proceed at the molecular level requires connecting observed kinetics to proposed mechanisms.

Reaction Mechanisms

  • Elementary steps combine to give the overall stoichiometry—each step has a molecularity that directly determines its rate law
  • Intermediates appear and disappear—they're produced in one step and consumed in another, never appearing in the overall equation
  • Consistency with observed rate law is mandatory—any proposed mechanism must predict the experimentally determined rate expression

Rate-Determining Step

  • Slowest step controls overall rate—like the narrowest part of a funnel, it limits how fast the reaction can proceed
  • Determines the form of the rate law—species appearing before or during the RDS affect the rate; those appearing after do not
  • Highest activation energy barrier typically identifies the RDS—this is where catalysts have the most impact

Compare: Elementary step rate laws vs. overall rate laws—elementary steps have rate laws determined by molecularity (unimolecular → first-order, bimolecular → second-order), but overall reactions can have any order depending on the mechanism. Never assume reaction order from stoichiometry.


Temperature and Energy Dependence

The rate constant kk isn't really constant—it depends strongly on temperature through the activation energy.

Arrhenius Equation

  • Exponential temperature dependencek=AeEa/RTk = Ae^{-E_a/RT} shows that rate constants increase dramatically with temperature
  • Activation energy EaE_a represents the minimum energy barrier molecules must overcome to react—higher EaE_a means stronger temperature dependence
  • Linearized form lnk=lnAEaRT\ln k = \ln A - \frac{E_a}{RT} allows determination of EaE_a from a plot of lnk\ln k vs. 1T\frac{1}{T} (Arrhenius plot)

Compare: Pre-exponential factor AA vs. activation energy EaE_a—both affect kk, but AA reflects collision frequency and orientation requirements (entropy-like) while EaE_a reflects the energy barrier (enthalpy-like). Temperature changes primarily affect the exponential term.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Concentration-independent rateZero-order reactions, surface-saturated catalysis
Exponential decay kineticsFirst-order reactions, radioactive decay
Concentration-dependent half-lifeZero-order (increases), second-order (decreases)
Simplifying complex mechanismsPseudo-first-order, steady-state approximation
Graphical order determinationIntegrated rate law plots ([A][A], ln[A]\ln[A], 1[A]\frac{1}{[A]} vs. tt)
Temperature dependenceArrhenius equation, activation energy
Mechanistic constraintsRate-determining step, consistency with rate law
Intermediate behaviorSteady-state approximation, pre-equilibrium

Self-Check Questions

  1. You measure successive half-lives for a reaction and find they increase as the reaction proceeds. Which two reaction orders could this behavior indicate, and how would you distinguish between them experimentally?

  2. A reaction between A and B follows the rate law Rate=k[A][B]\text{Rate} = k[A][B]. Under what experimental conditions would this reaction exhibit pseudo-first-order kinetics, and what would the observed rate law become?

  3. Compare and contrast how you would use integrated rate laws versus half-life measurements to determine reaction order from experimental data. What are the advantages of each approach?

  4. An Arrhenius plot for two different reactions shows that Reaction 1 has a steeper slope than Reaction 2. What does this tell you about their activation energies, and which reaction's rate constant is more sensitive to temperature changes?

  5. A proposed two-step mechanism predicts a rate law that differs from the experimentally observed rate law. What does this inconsistency tell you, and what approach might you use to derive a rate law for a mechanism with a reactive intermediate?