Why This Matters
Chemical kinetics is where thermodynamics meets reality—just because a reaction can happen doesn't mean it will happen fast enough to matter. In Physical Chemistry II, you're being tested on your ability to connect mathematical rate expressions to molecular-level events. This means understanding not just what the rate laws are, but why different reaction orders produce different concentration-time relationships and how experimental data reveals mechanistic information.
The concepts here—reaction order, integrated rate laws, half-life relationships, and the steady-state approximation—form the quantitative backbone of kinetic analysis. When you encounter an exam problem, you need to recognize which mathematical framework applies and why. Don't just memorize equations—know what physical situation each rate law describes and how to extract mechanistic insight from kinetic data.
Fundamental Rate Laws by Reaction Order
The reaction order tells you how concentration changes affect the rate. Each order produces a characteristic mathematical signature that you can identify through graphical analysis or half-life behavior.
Zero-Order Rate Law
- Rate is independent of reactant concentration—the reaction proceeds at a constant rate Rate=k until the reactant is depleted
- Linear concentration decay follows [A]=[A]0−kt, meaning a plot of [A] vs. t gives a straight line with slope −k
- Surface saturation or catalyst limitation typically causes zero-order behavior—the rate-limiting factor isn't how much reactant you have
First-Order Rate Law
- Rate is directly proportional to concentration—expressed as Rate=k[A], doubling concentration doubles the rate
- Exponential decay follows ln[A]=ln[A]0−kt, so a plot of ln[A] vs. t yields a straight line
- Constant half-life of t1/2=k0.693 is the signature feature—independent of how much reactant you start with
Second-Order Rate Law
- Rate depends on concentration squared—either Rate=k[A]2 for one reactant or Rate=k[A][B] for two
- Reciprocal concentration follows [A]1=[A]01+kt, giving a linear plot of [A]1 vs. t
- Half-life increases as reaction proceeds—t1/2=k[A]01 means each successive half-life is longer than the last
Compare: First-order vs. second-order half-lives—both depend on k, but first-order t1/2 is concentration-independent while second-order t1/2 increases as [A]0 decreases. If an FRQ gives you successive half-life data, this distinction immediately identifies the reaction order.
Simplifying Complex Kinetics
Real reactions rarely involve a single elementary step. These tools let you reduce complex mechanisms to tractable mathematics.
Pseudo-First-Order Rate Law
- Large excess of one reactant makes its concentration effectively constant, simplifying Rate=k[A][B] to Rate=k′[B] where k′=k[A]
- Isolates the kinetics of the limiting reactant—essential for studying enzyme-substrate interactions and hydrolysis reactions
- Experimentally powerful because you can determine the true rate constant by varying the excess reactant concentration
Steady-State Approximation
- Intermediate concentration stays constant—the rate of formation equals the rate of consumption, so dtd[I]≈0
- Eliminates intermediate terms from the rate law, allowing you to express the overall rate in terms of reactants only
- Valid when intermediates are reactive—they're consumed almost as fast as they're formed, keeping their concentration low and stable
Compare: Pseudo-first-order vs. steady-state—both simplify complex kinetics, but pseudo-first-order uses experimental conditions (excess reactant) while steady-state uses mathematical assumptions about intermediate behavior. Know when each approach is appropriate.
Connecting Rate Laws to Mechanisms
The observed rate law constrains what mechanisms are possible. These concepts bridge experimental kinetics and molecular-level understanding.
Integrated Rate Laws
- Transform differential equations into usable forms—connecting concentration directly to time for zero, first, and second-order reactions
- Enable graphical determination of order—plot [A], ln[A], or [A]1 vs. time and see which gives a straight line
- Yield rate constants from slopes—the linear plot's slope directly gives k (or −k), allowing quantitative kinetic analysis
Half-Life Equations
- Diagnostic for reaction order—zero-order: t1/2=2k[A]0; first-order: t1/2=k0.693; second-order: t1/2=k[A]01
- Concentration dependence is the key—if t1/2 changes with initial concentration, you're not dealing with first-order kinetics
- Practical applications include radioactive decay (first-order) and drug metabolism modeling
Compare: Zero-order vs. second-order half-life dependence—both depend on [A]0, but zero-order t1/2 increases with higher initial concentration while second-order t1/2 decreases. This counterintuitive result is a common exam trap.
Mechanistic Analysis
Understanding how reactions proceed at the molecular level requires connecting observed kinetics to proposed mechanisms.
Reaction Mechanisms
- Elementary steps combine to give the overall stoichiometry—each step has a molecularity that directly determines its rate law
- Intermediates appear and disappear—they're produced in one step and consumed in another, never appearing in the overall equation
- Consistency with observed rate law is mandatory—any proposed mechanism must predict the experimentally determined rate expression
Rate-Determining Step
- Slowest step controls overall rate—like the narrowest part of a funnel, it limits how fast the reaction can proceed
- Determines the form of the rate law—species appearing before or during the RDS affect the rate; those appearing after do not
- Highest activation energy barrier typically identifies the RDS—this is where catalysts have the most impact
Compare: Elementary step rate laws vs. overall rate laws—elementary steps have rate laws determined by molecularity (unimolecular → first-order, bimolecular → second-order), but overall reactions can have any order depending on the mechanism. Never assume reaction order from stoichiometry.
Temperature and Energy Dependence
The rate constant k isn't really constant—it depends strongly on temperature through the activation energy.
Arrhenius Equation
- Exponential temperature dependence—k=Ae−Ea/RT shows that rate constants increase dramatically with temperature
- Activation energy Ea represents the minimum energy barrier molecules must overcome to react—higher Ea means stronger temperature dependence
- Linearized form lnk=lnA−RTEa allows determination of Ea from a plot of lnk vs. T1 (Arrhenius plot)
Compare: Pre-exponential factor A vs. activation energy Ea—both affect k, but A reflects collision frequency and orientation requirements (entropy-like) while Ea reflects the energy barrier (enthalpy-like). Temperature changes primarily affect the exponential term.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Concentration-independent rate | Zero-order reactions, surface-saturated catalysis |
| Exponential decay kinetics | First-order reactions, radioactive decay |
| Concentration-dependent half-life | Zero-order (increases), second-order (decreases) |
| Simplifying complex mechanisms | Pseudo-first-order, steady-state approximation |
| Graphical order determination | Integrated rate law plots ([A], ln[A], [A]1 vs. t) |
| Temperature dependence | Arrhenius equation, activation energy |
| Mechanistic constraints | Rate-determining step, consistency with rate law |
| Intermediate behavior | Steady-state approximation, pre-equilibrium |
Self-Check Questions
-
You measure successive half-lives for a reaction and find they increase as the reaction proceeds. Which two reaction orders could this behavior indicate, and how would you distinguish between them experimentally?
-
A reaction between A and B follows the rate law Rate=k[A][B]. Under what experimental conditions would this reaction exhibit pseudo-first-order kinetics, and what would the observed rate law become?
-
Compare and contrast how you would use integrated rate laws versus half-life measurements to determine reaction order from experimental data. What are the advantages of each approach?
-
An Arrhenius plot for two different reactions shows that Reaction 1 has a steeper slope than Reaction 2. What does this tell you about their activation energies, and which reaction's rate constant is more sensitive to temperature changes?
-
A proposed two-step mechanism predicts a rate law that differs from the experimentally observed rate law. What does this inconsistency tell you, and what approach might you use to derive a rate law for a mechanism with a reactive intermediate?