Key Concepts of Change Management Processes

Why This Matters

Change management sits at the intersection of power, politics, and organizational behavior—three pillars you'll be tested on repeatedly. When organizations transform, they don't just shift processes; they redistribute influence, challenge existing coalitions, and force stakeholders to renegotiate their positions. Understanding these frameworks means understanding how leaders wield power, why resistance emerges, and what political strategies drive successful implementation.

You're being tested on more than memorizing steps in a model. Exams will ask you to analyze why certain change efforts fail, compare frameworks for different organizational contexts, and evaluate the role of coalitions, communication, and stakeholder dynamics in navigating resistance. Don't just memorize the stages—know what power dynamics and political realities each framework addresses.

---

Stage-Based Change Frameworks

These models break change into sequential phases, emphasizing that transformation requires deliberate progression. The underlying principle: change isn't an event but a process that must be managed through distinct stages to prevent regression.

Lewin's Change Management Model

• Three-stage structure (Unfreeze-Change-Refreeze)—the foundational framework that treats organizational stability as a force field requiring disruption before new behaviors can take hold
• Unfreezing challenges existing power structures—this stage explicitly requires breaking down entrenched mindsets and political coalitions that benefit from the status quo
• Refreezing institutionalizes new power arrangements—ensures change becomes permanent by embedding new norms, preventing old coalitions from reasserting control

Kotter's 8-Step Change Model

• Coalition-building as political strategy—steps 2-4 (form coalition, create vision, communicate) explicitly address the need to assemble power bases before attempting transformation
• Short-term wins serve political purposes—generating visible successes builds credibility, silences critics, and shifts organizational momentum toward change advocates
• Anchoring prevents political regression—final steps focus on embedding change in culture so displaced power holders cannot reverse progress

Bridges' Transition Model

• Distinguishes external change from internal transition—recognizes that structural changes happen quickly while psychological adaptation follows a slower, messier timeline
• Neutral Zone is politically vulnerable—this middle phase creates power vacuums where uncertainty enables both opportunity and resistance
• Endings require acknowledgment—leaders must recognize that change means loss for some stakeholders, requiring political sensitivity to manage grief and displacement

---

Individual-Focused Change Models

These frameworks recognize that organizational change ultimately happens person by person. The core insight: collective transformation requires individual adoption, and resistance often stems from unaddressed personal concerns.

ADKAR Model

• Five sequential individual requirements—Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement represent the personal journey from ignorance to sustained behavior change
• Diagnoses resistance at the personal level—allows leaders to identify where an individual is stuck (lacking desire? lacking ability?) and target interventions accordingly
• Desire element addresses political motivation—recognizes that employees must want to change, which requires addressing "what's in it for me" through incentives or coalition membership

Kübler-Ross Change Curve

• Maps emotional stages during change—Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance describe the predictable psychological journey through organizational transformation
• Helps leaders anticipate political resistance—anger and bargaining phases often manifest as coalition-building against change; recognizing this as normal prevents overreaction
• Acceptance requires time and support—rushing employees through stages backfires; effective change leaders provide space for emotional processing

Prosci's Change Management Methodology

• Integrates ADKAR with organizational tools—bridges individual psychology and structural change through templates, assessments, and planning frameworks
• Operates at dual levels simultaneously—addresses both personal adoption barriers and organizational readiness, recognizing their interdependence
• Provides measurable change metrics—transforms subjective "readiness" into assessable criteria, giving leaders political ammunition to demonstrate progress

---

Systemic Alignment Frameworks

These approaches view organizations as interconnected systems where change in one area ripples throughout. The key principle: sustainable transformation requires alignment across multiple organizational dimensions simultaneously.

McKinsey 7-S Framework

• Seven interdependent elements must align—Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff create a web where misalignment in any area undermines change
• Shared Values sit at the center—organizational culture acts as the political glue binding other elements; change efforts that ignore values face cultural resistance
• Hard and soft elements require different tactics—Strategy, Structure, and Systems respond to formal authority; Style, Staff, Skills, and Shared Values require influence and coalition-building

---

Political and Stakeholder Strategies

These concepts address the explicitly political dimensions of change—who holds power, who resists, and how leaders build support. The underlying reality: change is inherently political because it redistributes resources, influence, and status.

Stakeholder Analysis and Management

• Maps power and interest across affected parties—identifies who can block change, who can champion it, and who needs to be moved from opposition to support
• Informs coalition-building strategy—analysis reveals which stakeholders to prioritize, which to neutralize, and which alliances might form against change
• Requires ongoing reassessment—stakeholder positions shift as change progresses; static analysis misses emerging resistance or unexpected allies

Communication Planning and Execution

• Strategic messaging shapes political narratives—communication isn't just information transfer; it's framing that influences how stakeholders interpret change
• Transparency builds trust and reduces rumors—political resistance often feeds on uncertainty; consistent messaging starves opposition of ammunition
• Feedback mechanisms serve intelligence functions—listening channels reveal emerging resistance, stakeholder concerns, and coalition dynamics before they escalate

Resistance Management Strategies

• Treats resistance as political behavior—opposition isn't irrational; it reflects stakeholders protecting interests, relationships, or status threatened by change
• Involvement converts opponents to advocates—participation in change design gives resisters ownership and addresses concerns before they harden into opposition
• Multiple tools address different resistance sources—training addresses skill gaps, incentives address motivation, dialogue addresses fear; mismatched interventions fail

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two models both emphasize a three-phase structure, and how do their focal points differ (organizational vs. psychological)?

2. If an employee understands why change is happening but still refuses to adopt new behaviors, which element of the ADKAR model is likely the barrier, and what political factors might explain their resistance?

3. Compare Kotter's coalition-building steps with stakeholder analysis—how do both frameworks treat the role of power and influence in change success?

4. A change initiative succeeded in restructuring departments but failed to shift employee behaviors. Using McKinsey 7-S, which elements likely remained misaligned, and why does this represent a political failure?

5. FRQ-style: An organization announces a major restructuring. Using Kübler-Ross and Bridges' models together, explain the emotional and transitional journey employees will experience, and recommend two resistance management strategies appropriate for the "Neutral Zone" phase.