upgrade
upgrade

Groups and Geometries

Key Concepts of Cayley's Theorem

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Cayley's Theorem is one of the most powerful results in abstract algebra because it bridges the gap between abstract group structures and concrete permutation actions. When you're studying groups and geometries, you're constantly asked to recognize when two seemingly different algebraic objects share the same underlying structure—and Cayley's Theorem gives you a universal framework for doing exactly that. Every group, no matter how abstractly defined, can be "seen" as permutations shuffling elements around.

This theorem connects directly to core exam concepts: group isomorphisms, group actions, symmetric groups, and representation theory. You'll need to understand not just what the theorem states, but why the left regular representation works and how to apply it to specific groups. Don't just memorize the statement—know how to construct the embedding for a given group and recognize when two groups have equivalent permutation representations.


The Core Theorem and Its Statement

The fundamental insight is that abstract group multiplication can always be reinterpreted as function composition of permutations.

Statement of Cayley's Theorem

  • Every group GG is isomorphic to a subgroup of SGS_G—the symmetric group on the underlying set of GG itself
  • The embedding is constructive—we don't just know it exists, we can explicitly build the map using left multiplication
  • No restrictions on GG—the theorem applies to finite groups, infinite groups, abelian groups, and non-abelian groups alike

Proof Outline of Cayley's Theorem

  • Define ϕ:GSG\phi: G \to S_G by ϕ(g)=λg\phi(g) = \lambda_g—where λg(x)=gx\lambda_g(x) = gx is left multiplication by gg
  • ϕ\phi is an injective homomorphism—injectivity follows from cancellation; the homomorphism property from associativity
  • The image ϕ(G)\phi(G) is the desired subgroup—establishing that Gϕ(G)SGG \cong \phi(G) \leq S_G

Compare: The proof of Cayley's Theorem vs. proving any specific isomorphism—both require showing a map is a bijective homomorphism, but Cayley's construction is universal. If an exam asks you to embed a group into a symmetric group, this is your go-to method.


Foundational Structures

These are the building blocks that make Cayley's Theorem possible—you need fluency with each concept independently before the theorem clicks.

Group Isomorphism

  • A bijective homomorphism between groupspreserves the operation, meaning ϕ(ab)=ϕ(a)ϕ(b)\phi(ab) = \phi(a)\phi(b)
  • Isomorphic groups are structurally identical—they have the same order, same subgroup lattice, same number of elements of each order
  • Classification power—isomorphisms let us say "these are the same group" even when elements look completely different

Symmetric Group and Its Properties

  • SnS_n contains all permutations of nn elements—it has exactly n!n! elements
  • Non-abelian for n3n \geq 3—permutation composition doesn't commute in general, which is why SnS_n can "host" non-abelian subgroups
  • Universal container—Cayley's Theorem says SnS_n is large enough to contain (a copy of) every group of order nn or less

Definition of a Regular Group Action

  • Free and transitive simultaneouslyfree means only the identity fixes any point; transitive means any point can reach any other
  • Unique group element for each pair—given xx and yy in the set, exactly one gGg \in G satisfies gx=yg \cdot x = y
  • The left regular action is the prototypeGG acting on itself by left multiplication is the canonical example

Compare: Regular actions vs. general group actions—regular actions have no "wasted" structure (every group element does something distinct), while general actions may have nontrivial stabilizers. FRQs often ask you to identify when an action is regular.


The Representation Mechanism

The left regular representation is the engine that drives Cayley's Theorem—it converts group elements into permutations systematically.

Left Regular Representation

  • Each gGg \in G becomes the permutation λg:GG\lambda_g: G \to G—defined by λg(x)=gx\lambda_g(x) = gx
  • Multiplication becomes compositionλgλh=λgh\lambda_g \circ \lambda_h = \lambda_{gh}, which is why this gives a homomorphism
  • Faithful representation—different group elements give different permutations, so no information is lost

Relationship to Permutation Groups

  • Permutation groups are subgroups of some SXS_X—groups whose elements are bijections on a set XX
  • Cayley's Theorem says every group IS a permutation group—up to isomorphism, there's no distinction between "abstract" and "permutation" groups
  • Symmetry made concrete—this links algebraic structure to combinatorial and geometric symmetry

Compare: Left regular representation vs. other representations—the left regular representation always works but may be inefficient (it embeds GG into SGS_{|G|}). Other representations might embed GG into smaller symmetric groups. For example, D4D_4 naturally embeds in S4S_4 via its action on square vertices, not S8S_8.


Applications and Implications

Cayley's Theorem isn't just a theoretical curiosity—it has concrete consequences for how we study and classify groups.

Implications for Finite Groups

  • Every group of order nn embeds in SnS_n—this gives an upper bound on the "complexity" of finite groups
  • Combinatorial techniques apply—permutation counting, cycle types, and conjugacy classes become tools for studying any finite group
  • Subgroup hunting—to find all groups of order nn, you can (in principle) search for subgroups of SnS_n

Applications in Group Theory

  • Foundation for representation theory—Cayley's Theorem is the simplest case of representing groups via linear actions
  • Visualization tool—abstract groups become concrete permutations you can write in cycle notation
  • Cross-domain connections—links algebra to geometry (symmetry groups), combinatorics (counting), and even computer science (permutation algorithms)

Compare: Cayley's Theorem vs. Cayley graphs—both named after Arthur Cayley, both represent groups concretely. The theorem embeds groups in symmetric groups; Cayley graphs visualize groups as directed graphs. Know which tool fits which problem.


Concrete Examples

These examples show Cayley's Theorem in action—practice constructing the embeddings yourself.

Examples Illustrating Cayley's Theorem

  • Z/3Z\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z} embeds in S3S_3—the generator [1][1] maps to the 3-cycle (1 2 3)(1\ 2\ 3), giving a cyclic subgroup of order 3
  • D4D_4 acts on square vertices—the 8-element dihedral group embeds in S4S_4, with rotations as 4-cycles and reflections as products of transpositions
  • S3S_3 embeds in S6S_6 via left regular representation—though S3S_3 already "is" a permutation group, Cayley's construction gives a different (larger) embedding

Quick Reference Table

ConceptKey Points
Cayley's Theorem StatementGG \cong subgroup of SGS_G; every group is a permutation group
Left Regular Representationϕ(g)=λg\phi(g) = \lambda_g where λg(x)=gx\lambda_g(x) = gx; faithful homomorphism
Group IsomorphismBijective homomorphism; preserves structure completely
Symmetric Group SnS_nAll permutations of nn elements; order n!n!; non-abelian for n3n \geq 3
Regular ActionFree + transitive; unique gg mapping any xx to any yy
Proof StrategyDefine ϕ\phi, show injective homomorphism, image is subgroup
Finite Group ConsequenceOrder nn group embeds in SnS_n; combinatorial methods apply

Self-Check Questions

  1. Construct the embedding: Write out explicitly how Z/4Z\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z} embeds into S4S_4 using the left regular representation. What permutation corresponds to the generator [1][1]?

  2. Compare and contrast: Both Cayley's Theorem and the First Isomorphism Theorem produce isomorphisms between a group and a subgroup of another structure. What's the key difference in what they accomplish?

  3. Identify the concept: If a group GG acts on a set XX such that for any x,yXx, y \in X there exists a unique gGg \in G with gx=yg \cdot x = y, what type of action is this? Why is this property essential for Cayley's Theorem?

  4. Efficiency question: The left regular representation embeds D4D_4 (order 8) into S8S_8. Can you find a smaller symmetric group containing D4D_4 as a subgroup? What's the geometric interpretation?

  5. FRQ-style: Explain why Cayley's Theorem implies that studying permutation groups is sufficient for understanding all finite groups. What are the practical limitations of this approach?