Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding Bravais lattices is fundamental to everything you'll encounter in crystallography and solid-state physics. These 14 unique three-dimensional arrangements describe every possible way atoms can periodically repeat in space—and that periodicity directly determines a material's symmetry, electronic behavior, mechanical properties, and optical characteristics. When you're analyzing X-ray diffraction patterns, predicting material properties, or understanding phase transitions, you're working with Bravais lattice concepts.
You're being tested on more than just memorizing lattice names and parameters. Exams expect you to connect lattice geometry to physical properties, explain why certain materials adopt specific structures, and predict how symmetry affects behavior like isotropy versus anisotropy. Don't just memorize the seven crystal systems—know what constraints define each one and how those constraints manifest in real materials.
These lattices possess the highest symmetry in their respective families, making them the most common structures for metals and simple compounds. High symmetry means equivalent properties in multiple directions, which simplifies both analysis and prediction.
Compare: Cubic vs. Hexagonal—both are high-symmetry systems common in metals, but cubic lattices produce isotropic properties while hexagonal lattices create directional dependence. If asked why magnesium deforms differently than copper, lattice geometry is your answer.
These systems maintain 90° angles but relax the constraint of equal edge lengths. The resulting lower symmetry creates anisotropic properties while preserving relatively simple mathematical descriptions.
Compare: Tetragonal vs. Orthorhombic—both have 90° angles, but tetragonal retains one symmetry constraint () that orthorhombic abandons. This makes tetragonal a common intermediate during cubic-to-orthorhombic phase transitions.
When angles deviate from 90°, symmetry drops significantly. These lower-symmetry systems accommodate complex molecular structures and are common in minerals and organic crystals.
Compare: Monoclinic vs. Triclinic—monoclinic keeps two right angles as a "lifeline" of symmetry, while triclinic abandons all angular constraints. When analyzing unknown crystals, triclinic indexing is most challenging because no simplifying assumptions apply.
This system occupies a unique position—high edge-length symmetry combined with non-orthogonal angles creates distinctive properties.
Compare: Rhombohedral vs. Cubic—both have equal edge lengths, but the angular distortion in rhombohedral systems breaks the four-fold symmetry of cubic, creating three-fold symmetry instead. This distinction explains why quartz is optically active while cubic crystals are not.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Highest symmetry (isotropic) | Cubic (FCC, BCC) |
| Close-packed metals | FCC cubic, Hexagonal |
| Anisotropic but high symmetry | Hexagonal, Tetragonal |
| 90° angles, unequal edges | Orthorhombic, Tetragonal |
| Oblique angles | Monoclinic, Triclinic, Rhombohedral |
| Most centering variants | Orthorhombic (4 types) |
| Lowest symmetry | Triclinic |
| Phase transition intermediates | Tetragonal (cubic → lower symmetry) |
Which two crystal systems share the constraint of equal edge lengths but differ in their angular relationships? How does this affect their symmetry operations?
A material exhibits identical mechanical properties regardless of the direction of applied stress. Which Bravais lattice type(s) would you expect, and why?
Compare and contrast tetragonal and orthorhombic systems: what geometric constraint distinguishes them, and why does tetragonal have fewer centering options?
If you were indexing a diffraction pattern and found that no two angles equal 90°, which crystal system must you be working with? What additional challenge does this create?
Explain why face-centered tetragonal is not listed as a distinct Bravais lattice, even though face-centered cubic and face-centered orthorhombic both exist.