Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Urban design isn't just about making cities look nice—it's about understanding how physical spaces shape human behavior, social interaction, and environmental outcomes. When you study these concepts, you're learning to analyze why certain neighborhoods thrive while others struggle, how design decisions impact equity and accessibility, and what principles create sustainable, livable communities. These ideas connect directly to broader themes you'll encounter throughout your coursework: the tension between growth and preservation, the relationship between built environments and social capital, and the role of public space in democratic life.
Don't just memorize these ten concepts as isolated definitions. Instead, focus on how they interact and sometimes conflict with each other. You're being tested on your ability to evaluate trade-offs—density versus green space, historic preservation versus modern development, car infrastructure versus pedestrian priority. Know what design philosophy each concept represents, and be ready to apply them to real-world scenarios where multiple principles compete for limited urban space.
These concepts address how people navigate urban environments and what design choices either enable or restrict that movement. The underlying principle: cities that prioritize diverse transportation options create more equitable access to opportunity.
Compare: Walkability vs. Transit-Oriented Development—both reduce car dependency, but walkability focuses on neighborhood-scale design while TOD organizes regional-scale growth patterns around infrastructure investments. FRQs often ask you to explain how these work together in comprehensive planning.
These concepts govern what gets built where and at what intensity. The core tension: maximizing urban efficiency while maintaining quality of life and community character.
Compare: Mixed-Use Development vs. Density—mixed-use addresses what functions occupy space, while density addresses how much activity occupies space. A neighborhood can be dense but single-use (think high-rise residential towers) or mixed-use but low-density (a small-town main street). The most vibrant urban areas typically combine both.
These concepts focus on the quality of spaces between buildings—the streets, plazas, and parks where public life unfolds. The principle: good urban design treats the public realm as seriously as private development.
Compare: Placemaking vs. Human Scale—placemaking focuses on programming and activation of specific sites, while human scale addresses the overall sensory experience of moving through urban environments. A well-designed plaza (placemaking) still fails if the surrounding streets feel hostile to pedestrians (poor human scale).
These concepts address how urban design interacts with natural systems. The framework: cities are ecosystems, and design choices have measurable environmental consequences.
Compare: Sustainable Design vs. Transit-Oriented Development—both reduce environmental impact, but through different mechanisms. Sustainable design focuses on building performance and green infrastructure, while TOD reduces emissions through land use patterns that decrease driving. Comprehensive climate planning requires both approaches.
These concepts address how urban design preserves meaning and memory while accommodating change. The tension: cities must evolve, but growth shouldn't erase the qualities that make places distinctive.
Compare: Context-Sensitive Architecture vs. Historic Preservation—context-sensitivity guides new construction to fit existing character, while preservation protects existing structures from demolition or inappropriate alteration. Both serve cultural continuity, but preservation is more restrictive and typically involves formal regulatory protections.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Reducing car dependency | Walkability, Transit-Oriented Development, Connectivity |
| Efficient land use | Density, Mixed-Use Development, Transit-Oriented Development |
| Social interaction | Public Spaces, Human Scale, Mixed-Use Development |
| Environmental sustainability | Sustainable Design, Green Infrastructure, Compact Development |
| Cultural identity | Historic Preservation, Context-Sensitive Architecture, Placemaking |
| Equity and access | Connectivity, Universal Design, Housing Diversity |
| Economic vitality | Mixed-Use Development, Walkability, Transit-Oriented Development |
Which two concepts most directly address how people move through urban environments, and how do their scales of impact differ?
A city wants to reduce carbon emissions from transportation. Explain how Transit-Oriented Development and Sustainable Design would each contribute to this goal through different mechanisms.
Compare and contrast Context-Sensitive Architecture and Historic Preservation: what does each concept prioritize, and when might they come into conflict?
An FRQ presents a neighborhood with excellent walkability but no public gathering spaces. Which concept is missing, and what specific design elements would address the gap?
How do Density and Mixed-Use Development work together to create vibrant urban centers? Identify one potential tension between these concepts and explain how good design might resolve it.