Why This Matters
Stochastic differential equations sit at the intersection of probability theory, calculus, and real-world modeling—making them one of the most powerful tools you'll encounter in this course. When you're tested on SDEs, you're really being tested on your ability to understand how randomness interacts with continuous change, whether that's a stock price fluctuating over time, a particle diffusing through a medium, or an interest rate reverting to its long-term average. The core principles here—drift versus diffusion, measure changes, mean reversion, and martingale properties—show up repeatedly in both theoretical proofs and applied problems.
Don't just memorize the names and formulas. For each concept, ask yourself: What type of randomness does this capture? What real-world behavior does it model? How does it connect to other SDEs? If you can explain why geometric Brownian motion differs from an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, or why Girsanov's theorem matters for option pricing, you're thinking at the level the exam demands. These connections are what separate strong answers from mediocre ones.
Foundational Building Blocks
These concepts form the mathematical foundation upon which all SDEs are built. Without understanding continuous-time random processes and how to differentiate functions of them, you cannot work with any SDE.
Brownian Motion and Wiener Processes
- Continuous-time random process—Brownian motion models random movement where paths are continuous but nowhere differentiable, making it the canonical "noise" in SDEs
- Independent, stationary increments with W(t)−W(s)∼N(0,t−s)—the change over any interval depends only on the interval's length, not its location
- Variance grows linearly with time (Var(W(t))=t), which is why longer time horizons mean greater uncertainty in diffusion-driven models
- Stochastic chain rule—extends ordinary calculus to functions of Brownian motion, but includes an extra second-derivative term due to the dt-scale variance of dW
- The correction term 21∂x2∂2f(dX)2 arises because (dW)2=dt in the Itô calculus framework
- Essential for deriving SDEs—you'll use this to transform processes, verify solutions, and derive pricing equations like Black-Scholes
Compare: Brownian motion vs. Itô's formula—Brownian motion provides the random input, while Itô's formula tells you how functions of that input evolve. Think of Brownian motion as the "engine" and Itô's formula as the "transmission" that converts randomness into useful dynamics.
Asset Price Models
These SDEs describe how prices evolve over time, balancing deterministic trends (drift) with random fluctuations (diffusion). The key distinction is whether prices can go negative and whether they exhibit mean reversion.
Geometric Brownian Motion
- Exponential structure ensures prices stay positive—the SDE dS=μSdt+σSdW models multiplicative (percentage) changes rather than additive ones
- Constant drift μ and volatility σ produce log-normal price distributions, meaning ln(St) follows a normal distribution
- Foundation of Black-Scholes—this model's tractability makes it the standard assumption for equity prices, though it ignores fat tails and volatility clustering
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process
- Mean-reverting dynamics—the SDE dX=θ(μ−X)dt+σdW pulls the process toward long-term mean μ with speed θ
- Can go negative, making it unsuitable for prices but ideal for interest rates, spreads, and volatility that fluctuate around equilibrium values
- Stationary distribution exists—unlike Brownian motion, the variance stabilizes at 2θσ2 rather than growing indefinitely
Compare: Geometric Brownian motion vs. Ornstein-Uhlenbeck—GBM has no "anchor" and can drift arbitrarily far from its starting point, while O-U always pulls back toward its mean. If an FRQ asks about modeling interest rates, O-U is almost always the better choice; for stock prices, use GBM.
Probability and Measure Theory
These concepts address how we describe and transform the probability distributions governing stochastic processes. Mastering them is essential for derivative pricing and risk analysis.
Martingales and the Martingale Representation Theorem
- Fair game property—a martingale satisfies E[Xt∣Fs]=Xs, meaning the best prediction of future values is the current value (no drift)
- Representation theorem states any square-integrable martingale adapted to Brownian filtration can be written as Mt=M0+∫0tHsdWs for some process H
- Critical for hedging—this theorem guarantees that derivative payoffs can be replicated by trading the underlying asset, enabling no-arbitrage pricing
Girsanov Theorem
- Changes the probability measure to transform a process with drift into a martingale (or vice versa) by adjusting the "reference frame"
- Risk-neutral pricing relies on this—under the risk-neutral measure Q, discounted asset prices become martingales, simplifying option valuation
- The Radon-Nikodym derivative dPdQ quantifies how likely events are under the new measure relative to the original
Compare: Martingale property vs. Girsanov theorem—martingales describe processes with no expected drift, while Girsanov tells you how to create a martingale by switching measures. In finance, you start with real-world dynamics (P) and use Girsanov to move to the risk-neutral world (Q) where pricing becomes tractable.
Evolution Equations
These equations describe how probability distributions or prices evolve over time, connecting SDEs to partial differential equations.
Fokker-Planck Equation
- Governs probability density evolution—given an SDE, the Fokker-Planck (or forward Kolmogorov) equation describes how p(x,t) changes over time
- Drift and diffusion terms appear explicitly as ∂t∂p=−∂x∂[μ(x)p]+21∂x2∂2[σ2(x)p]
- Essential in statistical mechanics for analyzing equilibrium distributions and relaxation times of physical systems
Black-Scholes Equation
- PDE for option prices—derived by constructing a riskless hedge and applying Itô's formula, yielding ∂t∂V+21σ2S2∂S2∂2V+rS∂S∂V−rV=0
- Assumes GBM dynamics for the underlying asset, constant volatility, and continuous trading without transaction costs
- Closed-form solution exists for European options, giving the famous Black-Scholes formula that revolutionized derivatives markets
Compare: Fokker-Planck vs. Black-Scholes—both are PDEs arising from SDEs, but Fokker-Planck tracks the probability distribution of the state variable, while Black-Scholes tracks the price of a derivative. Fokker-Planck moves forward in time; Black-Scholes is often solved backward from the terminal payoff.
Computational Methods and Applications
When analytical solutions don't exist, numerical methods become essential. Understanding when and why to simulate is as important as knowing the theory.
Numerical Methods for SDEs (Euler-Maruyama)
- Discretizes the SDE via Xn+1=Xn+μ(Xn)Δt+σ(Xn)ΔWn, where ΔWn∼N(0,Δt)
- Strong vs. weak convergence—Euler-Maruyama has strong order 0.5 (pathwise accuracy) and weak order 1.0 (distributional accuracy)
- Higher-order schemes like Milstein add correction terms (21σσ′[(ΔW)2−Δt]) to improve strong convergence to order 1.0
Applications in Finance and Physics
- Finance applications include option pricing, portfolio optimization, interest rate modeling (Vasicek, CIR), and credit risk analysis
- Physics applications span particle diffusion, thermal fluctuations, population dynamics, and noise-driven phase transitions
- Common thread is modeling systems where deterministic dynamics are perturbed by continuous random forcing—the SDE framework unifies these diverse phenomena
Compare: Analytical solutions vs. numerical methods—use closed-form results (like Black-Scholes) when available for speed and accuracy, but rely on Monte Carlo simulation with Euler-Maruyama when dealing with path-dependent options, complex payoffs, or non-standard dynamics. Know which problems require which approach.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Continuous-time noise | Brownian motion, Wiener process |
| Stochastic calculus rules | Itô's formula, (dW)2=dt |
| Multiplicative/log-normal models | Geometric Brownian motion, Black-Scholes |
| Mean-reverting processes | Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, Vasicek model |
| Measure changes | Girsanov theorem, risk-neutral pricing |
| Fair game / no-drift processes | Martingales, martingale representation |
| Probability evolution | Fokker-Planck equation |
| Numerical simulation | Euler-Maruyama, Milstein scheme |
Self-Check Questions
-
Both geometric Brownian motion and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck are driven by Brownian motion—what fundamental property distinguishes their long-term behavior, and which would you choose to model a mean-reverting interest rate?
-
Explain why Itô's formula includes a second-derivative term that doesn't appear in the ordinary chain rule. What property of Brownian motion causes this?
-
Compare and contrast the Fokker-Planck equation and the Black-Scholes equation: what does each one describe, and how do their "directions" in time differ?
-
If you're asked to price a derivative under the risk-neutral measure, which theorem justifies changing from the real-world measure P to Q? What happens to the drift of the underlying asset under this transformation?
-
When would you use the Euler-Maruyama method instead of a closed-form solution, and what is its strong convergence order? How does the Milstein scheme improve upon it?