Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
International investment strategies sit at the heart of modern portfolio management, and you'll be tested on understanding why investors look beyond domestic markets and how they manage the unique risks that come with crossing borders. This topic connects directly to core concepts like risk-return tradeoffs, currency dynamics, market efficiency, and capital flowsโall foundational principles in international finance. When you see questions about portfolio construction or global capital markets, these strategies are your toolkit.
Don't just memorize the names of these investment approachesโknow what problem each one solves and what risks it introduces. The exam loves to test whether you understand the tradeoffs: why would an investor accept currency risk for higher yields? When does diversification actually fail to protect a portfolio? Master the underlying mechanisms, and you'll handle both multiple-choice and FRQ scenarios with confidence.
These approaches focus on protecting portfolio value from the unique risks of international investing. The core principle: global exposure creates new risk dimensions that require specific hedging and diversification techniques.
Compare: Global Diversification vs. Currency Hedgingโboth manage risk, but diversification spreads exposure across markets while hedging specifically targets currency volatility. On an FRQ about risk management tools, distinguish between these as complementary rather than substitutes.
These strategies involve purchasing securities or assets directly in foreign markets. The mechanism: investors gain exposure to foreign growth and income streams but must navigate local market conditions and regulations.
Compare: Global Equities vs. International Bondsโboth involve purchasing foreign securities, but equities offer growth potential with higher volatility while bonds provide income stability with interest rate sensitivity. If asked about portfolio construction for different investor profiles, this distinction matters.
These structures allow investors to access international markets through professionally managed portfolios. The principle: pooling capital reduces transaction costs and provides expertise that individual investors typically lack.
Compare: Mutual Funds/ETFs vs. Sovereign Wealth Fundsโboth pool capital for diversified international exposure, but mutual funds serve individual investors seeking market access while sovereign funds deploy national wealth with strategic and sometimes political objectives. Exam questions may ask about their different roles in capital flows.
These approaches involve direct business operations or ownership stakes in foreign markets. The mechanism: investors seek control or significant influence rather than passive financial returns.
Compare: FDI vs. Cross-Border M&Aโboth involve direct foreign business engagement, but FDI typically means building or establishing operations while M&A involves acquiring existing entities. FDI offers more control over development; M&A provides faster market entry but integration risk.
This strategy targets developing economies with higher growth potential and correspondingly higher risks. The tradeoff: accelerated economic growth offers superior return potential, but institutional weaknesses create unique vulnerabilities.
Compare: Emerging Markets vs. Developed Market Investingโboth seek equity returns, but emerging markets offer growth premiums with higher volatility and liquidity risk. Developed markets provide stability but lower growth ceilings. Portfolio allocation between them reflects risk tolerance and investment horizon.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Risk Reduction | Global Diversification, Currency Hedging |
| Direct Securities Exposure | Global Equity Investing, International Bond Investing |
| Pooled Vehicles | International Mutual Funds/ETFs, Sovereign Wealth Funds |
| Direct Business Investment | Foreign Direct Investment, Cross-Border M&A |
| Growth-Oriented Strategies | Emerging Markets Investing, Global Real Estate |
| Income Generation | International Bonds, Global Real Estate |
| Currency Risk Exposure | All unhedged international investments |
| Liquidity Considerations | Real Estate (low), ETFs (high), FDI (very low) |
Which two strategies both manage risk but target different risk typesโand how would you explain their complementary roles in a portfolio?
An investor wants international exposure but lacks the expertise to select individual foreign securities. Compare the advantages and limitations of two pooled investment vehicles they might consider.
How does emerging markets investing illustrate the risk-return tradeoff, and what specific risks distinguish it from developed market equity investing?
FRQ-style prompt: A multinational corporation is deciding between establishing a new manufacturing facility abroad (FDI) and acquiring an existing foreign competitor (M&A). Analyze the strategic considerations, risks, and potential returns of each approach.
Why might an investor choose to leave international bond investments unhedged despite currency risk, and under what market conditions would this decision prove costly?