Why This Matters
Health Information Technology (HIT) systems are the backbone of modern healthcare delivery, and understanding them is essential for comparing how different healthcare systems operate, innovate, and achieve (or fail to achieve) quality outcomes. You're being tested on more than just what these technologies do—you need to understand how they reshape care coordination, reduce errors, control costs, and empower patients across different healthcare models. Whether you're analyzing a single-payer system's national EHR infrastructure or a market-based system's fragmented data landscape, HIT concepts reveal how information flows (or doesn't) through a healthcare system.
These technologies demonstrate core principles of interoperability, clinical workflow optimization, patient engagement, and data-driven decision-making. On exams, you'll need to connect specific HIT tools to broader themes like healthcare access, quality improvement, cost containment, and health equity. Don't just memorize what each system does—know why it matters for healthcare delivery and how different countries leverage (or struggle with) these tools based on their system structure.
Data Infrastructure and Record Management
These foundational systems create the digital backbone of healthcare delivery. Without centralized, accessible patient data, coordination across providers becomes impossible, errors multiply, and costs balloon from redundant testing.
Electronic Health Records (EHR)
- Centralized digital repositories—store comprehensive patient health information including diagnoses, medications, allergies, and treatment history in one accessible location
- Real-time data sharing enables multiple providers to access and update patient information simultaneously, eliminating information silos between specialists, primary care, and hospitals
- Regulatory compliance and quality reporting built into EHR systems supports value-based care initiatives and allows systems to track population health metrics
- Cross-organizational data sharing—enables secure transfer of patient information between unaffiliated healthcare organizations, critical for patients who see providers in multiple systems
- Reduces duplicative testing by giving providers access to results from other facilities, generating cost savings and sparing patients unnecessary procedures
- Public health surveillance capabilities allow aggregated, de-identified data to flow to health departments for disease tracking and outbreak response
Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)
- Digital medical imaging storage—replaces physical film with electronic storage of X-rays, MRIs, CT scans, and other diagnostic images
- Historical comparison tools allow radiologists to pull up previous imaging studies instantly, improving diagnostic accuracy for conditions that progress over time
- Multi-facility image sharing supports specialist consultations and second opinions without physically transporting films or patients
Compare: EHR vs. HIE—both manage patient data, but EHRs operate within a single organization while HIEs facilitate data exchange between organizations. If an FRQ asks about care coordination challenges in fragmented healthcare systems, HIE limitations are your strongest example.
Clinical Decision Support and Safety Systems
These technologies sit at the point of care, helping clinicians make better decisions in real time. They represent the shift from relying solely on provider memory and judgment to evidence-based, algorithmically-supported clinical practice.
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)
- Evidence-based alerts and recommendations—delivers clinical guidelines, diagnostic suggestions, and treatment protocols directly into the provider workflow
- Error prevention through automated warnings about drug interactions, contraindicated medications, and abnormal lab values that might otherwise be missed
- Personalized treatment support analyzes individual patient data against best practices to suggest tailored interventions, advancing precision medicine approaches
Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)
- Electronic ordering replaces handwriting—providers enter medication, lab, and procedure orders digitally, eliminating transcription errors from illegible prescriptions
- EHR integration provides real-time access to patient allergies, current medications, and lab values at the moment of ordering, preventing errors before they occur
- Automated safety alerts flag potential drug-drug interactions, dosing errors, and allergy conflicts before orders are processed
- Medication management hub—controls dispensing workflows, inventory tracking, and prescription processing within pharmacy operations
- Integration with CPOE and EHR creates closed-loop medication management, ensuring the right drug reaches the right patient at the right dose
- Clinical pharmacist support through drug interaction databases and medication therapy management tools that enhance pharmacist contributions to care teams
Compare: CDSS vs. CPOE—both improve safety, but CDSS provides recommendations and alerts while CPOE focuses specifically on order entry accuracy. CPOE is the mechanism; CDSS is the intelligence layer. Systems with robust CDSS but weak CPOE adoption still see preventable medication errors.
Patient Access and Engagement Technologies
These tools shift power toward patients, enabling self-management and direct access to health information. Patient engagement technologies reflect broader debates about healthcare consumerism and shared decision-making.
Patient Portals
- Secure health information access—gives patients direct online access to lab results, medication lists, visit summaries, and appointment scheduling
- Self-management support allows patients to track health metrics, request prescription refills, and review care plans, promoting health literacy and autonomy
- Provider communication through secure messaging reduces phone tag and enables asynchronous questions, though adoption varies significantly by patient demographics
- Remote clinical encounters—enables video consultations, phone visits, and asynchronous provider communication without requiring physical presence
- Access expansion particularly benefits rural populations, mobility-limited patients, and those facing transportation barriers, addressing geographic health disparities
- Cost reduction for both systems and patients by eliminating travel expenses and reducing demand for physical clinic infrastructure
Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications
- Smartphone-based health tools—deliver health information, tracking capabilities, and provider communication through personal mobile devices
- Chronic disease management features allow patients to log symptoms, medications, blood glucose, blood pressure, and other vital signs for ongoing monitoring
- Accessibility advantages meet patients where they are, though the digital divide means benefits don't reach all populations equally
Compare: Patient Portals vs. mHealth Apps—portals are typically institution-specific and tethered to a provider's EHR, while mHealth apps are often standalone and patient-controlled. Countries with strong primary care gatekeeping may see better portal adoption; market-based systems often see fragmented mHealth proliferation.
Analytics and Population Health Management
These systems transform raw healthcare data into actionable intelligence. The shift from reactive, individual-focused care to proactive, population-level management depends entirely on robust analytics infrastructure.
- Large-scale data analysis—processes massive datasets to identify patterns in clinical outcomes, operational efficiency, and cost drivers across populations
- Performance benchmarking enables healthcare organizations to compare their quality metrics, readmission rates, and patient satisfaction against peers and targets
- At-risk population identification supports proactive outreach to patients likely to experience adverse outcomes, enabling preventive interventions before crises occur
Compare: Healthcare Analytics vs. CDSS—analytics tools work at the population and organizational level to identify trends and inform strategy, while CDSS operates at the individual patient level during clinical encounters. Both are data-driven, but they serve fundamentally different purposes in the care delivery chain.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Data Infrastructure | EHR, HIE, PACS |
| Medication Safety | CPOE, Pharmacy Information Systems, CDSS |
| Clinical Decision Support | CDSS, Healthcare Analytics |
| Patient Engagement | Patient Portals, mHealth Apps, Telehealth |
| Access Expansion | Telemedicine, mHealth, Patient Portals |
| Interoperability | HIE, PACS, EHR-CPOE Integration |
| Cost Containment | HIE, Telemedicine, Healthcare Analytics |
| Population Health | Healthcare Analytics, HIE, EHR |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two HIT systems work together to create "closed-loop" medication safety, and what specific errors does each prevent?
-
A country with a fragmented, multi-payer healthcare system is struggling with care coordination. Which HIT concept most directly addresses this challenge, and why might implementation be difficult in that context?
-
Compare and contrast how Patient Portals and mHealth applications empower patients differently—what are the strengths and limitations of each approach for health equity?
-
If an FRQ asks you to explain how health information technology can reduce healthcare costs, which three systems would provide the strongest examples, and what mechanism does each use?
-
CDSS and Healthcare Analytics both rely on data analysis—explain how their scope, timing, and purpose differ in supporting healthcare delivery.