Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Emerging market economies aren't just a list of countries to memorize—they're living case studies of how nations develop, integrate into global trade networks, and navigate the tensions between growth and stability. When you study these economies, you're being tested on your understanding of comparative advantage, foreign direct investment flows, exchange rate dynamics, trade agreements, and economic development strategies. The AP exam loves asking why certain countries attract FDI while others struggle, or how commodity dependence creates vulnerability.
Think of emerging markets as economies caught between two worlds: they've moved beyond low-income status but haven't yet achieved the institutional stability of developed nations. This makes them fascinating laboratories for concepts like the demographic dividend, Dutch disease, and export-led growth. Don't just memorize GDP rankings—know what structural factors drive each economy and how they connect to broader international economic principles.
These economies leveraged low labor costs and strategic trade policies to become global production hubs. The underlying mechanism is comparative advantage in labor-intensive manufacturing, combined with deliberate integration into multinational supply chains.
Compare: China vs. Mexico—both built economies on export manufacturing, but China developed indigenous technology sectors while Mexico remains more dependent on foreign-owned assembly operations. If an FRQ asks about different paths to industrialization, contrast their approaches to technology transfer and domestic capacity building.
These economies skipped traditional manufacturing-heavy development paths, instead leveraging human capital and technological adoption to compete in high-value service exports.
Compare: India vs. Malaysia—both emphasize services and technology, but India's scale creates a massive domestic market while Malaysia relies more heavily on trade openness and regional integration. This illustrates how market size affects development strategy.
These nations possess significant natural resource endowments that drive export revenues but create vulnerability to price volatility and the risk of Dutch disease—where resource wealth crowds out other sectors.
Compare: Brazil vs. Russia—both face commodity dependence, but Brazil's agricultural exports are renewable while Russia's hydrocarbon reserves are finite. Russia also faces geopolitical isolation that Brazil doesn't, showing how political factors compound economic vulnerabilities.
These economies leverage their physical location to capture trade flows and serve as bridges between major economic regions. Geographic advantage creates opportunities for transit trade, logistics services, and regional headquarters functions.
Compare: Turkey vs. Indonesia—both leverage geographic positioning, but Turkey bridges established markets (EU and Middle East) while Indonesia connects emerging Asian economies. Turkey's EU customs union provides different trade advantages than Indonesia's ASEAN membership.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Export-led manufacturing | China, Mexico, Thailand |
| Service sector development | India, Malaysia |
| Commodity dependence | Brazil, Russia, South Africa |
| Demographic dividend | India, Indonesia |
| Regional trade integration | Mexico (USMCA), Malaysia (ASEAN/CPTPP) |
| Geographic/strategic positioning | Turkey, Indonesia |
| Currency/exchange rate volatility | Turkey, Russia |
| FDI attraction strategies | India, Malaysia, Mexico |
Which two emerging markets best illustrate the risks of commodity dependence, and what distinguishes their specific vulnerabilities?
Compare the development strategies of India and China—how do their approaches to manufacturing versus services reflect different applications of comparative advantage?
If an FRQ asks about how geographic location affects trade patterns, which three countries would provide the strongest examples, and what specific advantages does each leverage?
Mexico and Malaysia both participate actively in regional trade agreements. How do USMCA and ASEAN/CPTPP create different types of economic integration, and what are the trade-offs of each approach?
Explain how the concept of the demographic dividend applies differently to India and Indonesia—what conditions must be met for population growth to translate into economic growth?