Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Get Started
Why This Matters
Additive manufacturing (AM) isn't just about knowing which printer does what—it's about understanding how different fabrication principles solve different design problems. You're being tested on your ability to select the right process for a given application, predict design constraints, and explain why certain technologies excel at specific tasks. The core principles here—material deposition methods, energy sources, support requirements, and post-processing needs—determine everything from part strength to surface finish to cost.
When you encounter AM questions, think beyond the acronym. Ask yourself: What's the energy source? What's the base material state? Does it need supports? These fundamentals will help you compare technologies, troubleshoot design challenges, and justify process selection in any FRQ scenario. Don't just memorize process names—know what problem each one solves best.
Thermoplastic Extrusion Methods
These processes work by heating solid material until it flows, then depositing it in precise patterns. The material solidifies as it cools, bonding to previous layers through thermal fusion.
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)
- Thermoplastic filament extrusion—material is heated past its glass transition temperature and deposited through a nozzle layer by layer
- Support structures required for overhangs greater than 45°, which adds design complexity and post-processing time
- Material versatility includes ABS, PLA, and PETG, making it the most accessible AM technology for prototyping and low-cost production
Photopolymer Curing Technologies
These methods use light energy to solidify liquid resin through photopolymerization. UV or visible light triggers a chemical reaction that cross-links polymer chains, transforming liquid into solid.
Stereolithography (SLA)
- UV laser curing—a focused laser traces each layer's cross-section, curing liquid photopolymer resin with high precision
- Superior surface finish and fine detail resolution make it ideal for jewelry, dental applications, and detailed prototypes
- Post-processing required—parts must be washed to remove uncured resin, then UV-cured to achieve full mechanical strength
Digital Light Processing (DLP)
- Projected light curing—an entire layer is cured simultaneously using a digital projector, dramatically increasing build speed compared to SLA
- High resolution with speed—produces detailed parts with excellent surface quality in shorter timeframes
- Same post-processing needs as SLA, including resin removal and final curing for optimal properties
Continuous Liquid Interface Production (CLIP)
- Oxygen-inhibited dead zone—creates a continuous liquid interface that allows uninterrupted vertical pulling rather than layer-by-layer building
- Dramatically faster production—eliminates the start-stop of traditional layer methods, reducing print times by up to 100x
- Isotropic part properties—continuous fabrication reduces the layer lines and anisotropy common in other AM processes
Compare: SLA vs. DLP—both cure photopolymer resin with UV light, but SLA uses a point laser while DLP cures an entire layer at once. Choose SLA for maximum detail on small parts; choose DLP when speed matters more than ultimate resolution.
Powder Bed Fusion Technologies
These processes use thermal energy to fuse powdered material. Unfused powder surrounding the part acts as natural support, enabling complex geometries without additional structures.
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
- Laser-fused polymer powder—typically nylon, sintered layer by layer without requiring support structures
- Self-supporting builds—unsintered powder surrounds the part during fabrication, enabling complex internal channels and geometries
- Functional end-use parts—produces strong, durable components suitable for aerospace and automotive applications
- Metal powder fusion—a high-powered laser fully melts metal powder particles, creating dense, high-strength metal parts
- Near-full density achievable with proper parameters, producing mechanical properties comparable to wrought materials
- Heat treatment required—post-processing relieves internal stresses and optimizes metallurgical properties
Electron Beam Melting (EBM)
- Electron beam energy source—operates in a vacuum environment, melting metal powder with an electron beam rather than a laser
- Reduced residual stress—the elevated build chamber temperature minimizes thermal gradients and internal stresses
- Aerospace and medical implants—ideal for titanium alloys used in hip implants and turbine components
Compare: SLS vs. DMLS—both use laser energy on powder beds, but SLS sinters polymer powder while DMLS fully melts metal powder. SLS parts are functional plastics; DMLS parts are structural metals. If an FRQ asks about support-free metal fabrication, DMLS is your answer.
Binder-Based Technologies
These processes use a liquid binding agent to join powder particles. Parts are built "green" and require post-processing to achieve final density and strength.
Binder Jetting
- Liquid binder deposition—a print head selectively deposits binding agent onto powder layers (metals, ceramics, or sand)
- No support structures needed—like powder bed fusion, loose powder supports the part during building
- Green part requires sintering—printed parts are fragile until post-processed with infiltration or furnace sintering to achieve strength
Compare: Binder Jetting vs. DMLS—both can produce metal parts, but binder jetting deposits adhesive while DMLS applies laser energy. Binder jetting is faster and cheaper for large parts but requires extensive post-processing; DMLS produces fully dense parts directly.
Multi-Material Jetting
These processes deposit material droplets with inkjet-style precision. Multiple print heads enable simultaneous deposition of different materials, colors, or properties.
Material Jetting
- Droplet-based deposition—photopolymer droplets are jetted and immediately UV-cured, similar to 2D inkjet printing
- Multi-material capability—different materials and colors can be deposited in a single build, enabling functional gradients and realistic prototypes
- High resolution but brittle—excellent detail and surface finish, but photopolymer materials typically have lower strength than thermoplastics
Compare: Material Jetting vs. FDM—both deposit material through nozzles, but material jetting uses liquid photopolymer droplets while FDM uses extruded thermoplastic. Material jetting wins on resolution and multi-material capability; FDM wins on material strength and cost.
Sheet Lamination Technologies
These processes bond sheets of material and cut each layer's profile. Subtractive cutting combined with additive stacking creates a hybrid fabrication approach.
Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM)
- Sheet stacking and cutting—layers of paper, plastic, or metal foil are bonded with adhesive, then laser-cut to shape
- Cost-effective for large parts—material costs are low, making it suitable for large-scale models and patterns
- Limited functional applications—lower resolution and material properties restrict use primarily to visual prototypes and casting patterns
Quick Reference Table
|
| Photopolymer curing | SLA, DLP, CLIP |
| Powder bed fusion (polymer) | SLS |
| Powder bed fusion (metal) | DMLS, EBM |
| Support-free fabrication | SLS, DMLS, Binder Jetting |
| Multi-material capability | Material Jetting |
| Fastest resin printing | CLIP, DLP |
| Highest metal part density | DMLS, EBM |
| Lowest cost prototyping | FDM, LOM |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two AM technologies both use UV light to cure photopolymer resin, and what distinguishes their curing approach?
-
A designer needs to fabricate a part with complex internal cooling channels in metal. Which processes would allow this without designing support structures, and why?
-
Compare and contrast SLS and DMLS: What do they share in terms of process mechanics, and how do their materials and applications differ?
-
If an FRQ asks you to recommend a process for producing multi-color, high-detail prototypes in a single build, which technology would you select and what trade-offs would you mention?
-
Why does CLIP produce parts faster than traditional SLA, and what fundamental process difference enables this speed advantage?