Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Additive manufacturing (AM) isn't just about knowing which printer does what—it's about understanding how different fabrication principles solve different design problems. You're being tested on your ability to select the right process for a given application, predict design constraints, and explain why certain technologies excel at specific tasks. The core principles here—material deposition methods, energy sources, support requirements, and post-processing needs—determine everything from part strength to surface finish to cost.
When you encounter AM questions, think beyond the acronym. Ask yourself: What's the energy source? What's the base material state? Does it need supports? These fundamentals will help you compare technologies, troubleshoot design challenges, and justify process selection in any FRQ scenario. Don't just memorize process names—know what problem each one solves best.
These processes work by heating solid material until it flows, then depositing it in precise patterns. The material solidifies as it cools, bonding to previous layers through thermal fusion.
These methods use light energy to solidify liquid resin through photopolymerization. UV or visible light triggers a chemical reaction that cross-links polymer chains, transforming liquid into solid.
Compare: SLA vs. DLP—both cure photopolymer resin with UV light, but SLA uses a point laser while DLP cures an entire layer at once. Choose SLA for maximum detail on small parts; choose DLP when speed matters more than ultimate resolution.
These processes use thermal energy to fuse powdered material. Unfused powder surrounding the part acts as natural support, enabling complex geometries without additional structures.
Compare: SLS vs. DMLS—both use laser energy on powder beds, but SLS sinters polymer powder while DMLS fully melts metal powder. SLS parts are functional plastics; DMLS parts are structural metals. If an FRQ asks about support-free metal fabrication, DMLS is your answer.
These processes use a liquid binding agent to join powder particles. Parts are built "green" and require post-processing to achieve final density and strength.
Compare: Binder Jetting vs. DMLS—both can produce metal parts, but binder jetting deposits adhesive while DMLS applies laser energy. Binder jetting is faster and cheaper for large parts but requires extensive post-processing; DMLS produces fully dense parts directly.
These processes deposit material droplets with inkjet-style precision. Multiple print heads enable simultaneous deposition of different materials, colors, or properties.
Compare: Material Jetting vs. FDM—both deposit material through nozzles, but material jetting uses liquid photopolymer droplets while FDM uses extruded thermoplastic. Material jetting wins on resolution and multi-material capability; FDM wins on material strength and cost.
These processes bond sheets of material and cut each layer's profile. Subtractive cutting combined with additive stacking creates a hybrid fabrication approach.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Photopolymer curing | SLA, DLP, CLIP |
| Powder bed fusion (polymer) | SLS |
| Powder bed fusion (metal) | DMLS, EBM |
| Support-free fabrication | SLS, DMLS, Binder Jetting |
| Multi-material capability | Material Jetting |
| Fastest resin printing | CLIP, DLP |
| Highest metal part density | DMLS, EBM |
| Lowest cost prototyping | FDM, LOM |
Which two AM technologies both use UV light to cure photopolymer resin, and what distinguishes their curing approach?
A designer needs to fabricate a part with complex internal cooling channels in metal. Which processes would allow this without designing support structures, and why?
Compare and contrast SLS and DMLS: What do they share in terms of process mechanics, and how do their materials and applications differ?
If an FRQ asks you to recommend a process for producing multi-color, high-detail prototypes in a single build, which technology would you select and what trade-offs would you mention?
Why does CLIP produce parts faster than traditional SLA, and what fundamental process difference enables this speed advantage?