Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Competitive strategy isn't just about picking a playbook—it's about understanding why certain approaches work in specific market conditions and how firms create sustainable advantages. You're being tested on your ability to analyze strategic choices, not just define them. Exams will ask you to evaluate when cost leadership makes sense versus differentiation, why some first movers succeed while others get overtaken, and how integration decisions reshape industry dynamics.
The strategies in this guide demonstrate core principles like value creation, market positioning, competitive dynamics, and resource allocation. Each strategy represents a distinct answer to the fundamental question: how does a firm win? Don't just memorize definitions—know what trade-offs each strategy involves, what conditions favor it, and how it connects to concepts like barriers to entry, economies of scale, switching costs, and value chain analysis.
These foundational strategies from Porter's framework define how a firm positions itself relative to competitors. The key insight: you must choose—trying to be everything to everyone leads to being "stuck in the middle."
Compare: Cost Leadership vs. Differentiation—both seek competitive advantage but through opposite mechanisms. Cost leaders win on price by minimizing expenses; differentiators win on perceived value by maximizing uniqueness. FRQs often ask you to evaluate which strategy fits a given industry structure.
Rather than fighting for existing demand, these strategies focus on creating new demand or capturing emerging opportunities. The underlying principle: competitive advantage can come from avoiding competition entirely.
Compare: First-Mover vs. Fast Follower—both target emerging markets but accept different risk profiles. First movers bet on shaping the market; fast followers bet on executing better once uncertainty clears. If an FRQ presents a new technology market, analyze which approach fits the firm's resources and risk tolerance.
Integration strategies reshape industry structure by combining activities across the value chain or consolidating market share. The core trade-off: greater control versus increased complexity and capital requirements.
Compare: Vertical vs. Horizontal Integration—vertical expands along the value chain (different activities), horizontal expands within the same activity (more market share). Both increase firm size but create different strategic advantages and regulatory concerns.
These strategies extend competitive reach through partnerships or portfolio expansion rather than direct competition or acquisition. The key insight: firms can access resources and markets without full ownership.
Compare: Strategic Alliances vs. Diversification—both expand firm scope, but alliances preserve flexibility while diversification commits capital. Alliances suit uncertain opportunities; diversification suits proven synergies. Consider the "make vs. buy vs. partner" framework.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Positioning choices | Cost Leadership, Differentiation, Focus |
| Market creation | Blue Ocean Strategy, First-Mover Advantage |
| Timing decisions | First-Mover Advantage, Fast Follower |
| Value chain control | Vertical Integration, Horizontal Integration |
| Capability extension | Strategic Alliances, Diversification |
| Risk management | Fast Follower, Diversification, Strategic Alliances |
| Scale-based advantage | Cost Leadership, Horizontal Integration |
| Innovation-driven | Blue Ocean Strategy, Differentiation |
Which two strategies both seek competitive advantage through positioning but require opposite resource investments and target different customer priorities?
A firm is considering entering a rapidly evolving technology market with high uncertainty. Compare the trade-offs between first-mover advantage and fast follower strategy—under what conditions would each be preferable?
How does vertical integration differ from horizontal integration in terms of competitive effects, regulatory concerns, and management challenges?
Explain why blue ocean strategy is considered a departure from traditional Porter positioning strategies. What assumption does it challenge?
A company wants to enter a foreign market but lacks local expertise and faces high entry costs. Compare strategic alliance versus diversification through acquisition—what factors should drive this decision?