Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Coastal hazards aren't random disasters—they're interconnected physical processes that engineers must understand to design effective protection systems. You're being tested on your ability to identify driving mechanisms, cascading effects, and appropriate engineering responses for each hazard type. The key is recognizing how hazards interact: sea level rise amplifies storm surge, subsidence compounds flooding, and climate change accelerates nearly everything.
Don't just memorize a list of hazards. Know what causes each one, how they compound each other, and which engineering solutions address which mechanisms. When an exam question asks you to evaluate coastal vulnerability or propose resilience strategies, you need to connect specific hazards to their underlying physics and appropriate interventions.
These hazards develop over years to decades, allowing time for adaptive engineering—but their slow progression often leads to delayed action until impacts become severe.
Compare: Sea level rise vs. coastal subsidence—both raise relative water levels, but sea level rise is global and climate-driven while subsidence is local and often human-caused. Engineering responses differ: you can't stop global sea level rise locally, but you can reduce subsidence through groundwater management.
These hazards strike rapidly with high-intensity impacts, requiring both predictive warning systems and robust structural design to withstand extreme loads.
Compare: Storm surge vs. extreme waves—surge raises the mean water level while waves add dynamic loading on top. A seawall designed for surge alone will fail if wave overtopping and impact forces aren't considered. FRQ tip: always address both components when evaluating coastal structure design.
These hazards provide minimal warning time, making early detection systems and pre-positioned evacuation plans the primary life-safety strategies.
Compare: Tsunamis vs. storm surge—both cause coastal inundation, but tsunamis arrive as discrete wave trains with rapid drawdown between crests, while surge is sustained elevation lasting hours. Tsunami loads include high-velocity debris impact; surge loads are primarily hydrostatic.
These hazards cause cumulative damage through repeated or continuous processes, requiring ongoing maintenance strategies rather than one-time structural solutions.
Compare: Coastal erosion vs. flooding—erosion permanently removes land while flooding temporarily inundates it. However, erosion can increase flood vulnerability by removing protective dunes and beaches. Nourishment projects serve dual purposes: rebuilding beaches for erosion control while maintaining storm damage reduction.
These hazards threaten ecological function and human health, requiring monitoring networks and source control rather than traditional structural engineering.
Compare: Saltwater intrusion vs. harmful algal blooms—both are water quality hazards, but intrusion is a physical process (density-driven flow) while HABs are biological (organism growth). Intrusion solutions focus on hydraulic management; HAB solutions require nutrient source reduction across entire watersheds.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Climate-driven hazards | Sea level rise, hurricanes, extreme waves |
| Human-amplified hazards | Coastal subsidence, saltwater intrusion, harmful algal blooms |
| Compound/cascading hazards | Storm surge + sea level rise, flooding + erosion |
| Requires early warning systems | Tsunamis, hurricanes, storm surge |
| Requires ongoing maintenance | Beach nourishment (erosion), groundwater management (intrusion) |
| Design load calculations | Storm surge (stillwater), extreme waves (), tsunamis (run-up) |
| Watershed-scale solutions | Harmful algal blooms, compound flooding |
| Relative vs. absolute change | Subsidence (local) vs. sea level rise (global) |
Which two hazards both raise effective water levels but require fundamentally different engineering responses—and why can't you address one with solutions designed for the other?
A coastal city experiences 5 mm/year of relative sea level rise but global rates are only 3.4 mm/year. What hazard explains the difference, and what management intervention could reduce it?
Compare and contrast the flood mechanisms of storm surge and tsunamis. How would structural design criteria differ for a coastal building in a hurricane zone versus a tsunami zone?
An FRQ asks you to evaluate a seawall proposal for an eroding shoreline. What unintended consequence should you address, and what alternative or complementary approach might mitigate it?
Which hazards require watershed-scale management rather than shoreline-focused engineering? Explain why structural solutions at the coast are insufficient for these threats.